I never understood why so many people call for the abolishment of the Second Amendment after a shooting. It's because passion takes over and people lose their senses.
We've had two cases this week. A case where police enticed perverts to come to a house where they believe children would be to have sex with them and now we have this case. An idiot mother starved her 4 year old to death.
With these two very disturbing cases, we have outcry from a group that specializes in protecting a certain right (The 2nd Amendment) to abolish, first the 8th Amendment so that we can torture to death the pedophiles, and now we have outcry to abolish both the 5th and 6th Amendment so that we can just skip the fair, speedy trial, skip due process of the law and simply execute her.
I understand why people clamber for the abolishment of the Bill of Rights. I can't say this without sounding like a jerk, but when you're calling for three of my Rights to be thrown away, I should treat you three times worse than the liberal morons from Chicago who call for my 2nd Amendment right to be taken away. People clamber for the abolishment of our Bill of Rights because they are either cowards or fools. The document is pure, while our justice system may not be. The Rights are NOT the problem.
As Dross pointed out, you can't throw everyone's rights away at the moment the government says you're a criminal and you're under arrest. We have to have a fair trial and one must be found guilty first.
I think many of us tend to forget the entire contents of the Bill of Rights at times (I know I do) in our emotion over a seeming wrong that's thrown in our faces. I'll go further. I've seen many many comments about police malfeasance on this forum. The full truth about that supposed malfeasance (or criminality, if you will) may be known - but it may not be, either. At the State Fair the other day, I ran into a police official I've known for 20 years. He's a former member of IPD, but isn't one now. He had some info on the current IMPD furor. While he couldn't go into detail, if there was "incompetence" over the officer's blood draw, it wasn't the police.
Greg Garrison mentioned on his show, as did a former Bartholomew Country Sheriff on another radio show, that it's almost inconceivable that, with all the various fire, EMS, and ambulance personnel at the scene, that no one would have noticed the police officer involved was drunk. While the police might have tried to cover it up, why would the fire or EMS folks have done so? However, this officer has already been tried by public opinion and the _evidence_ of his guilt hasn't been presented yet.
We get so incensed over perceived wrongdoings of others that we, in the heat of the moment, are willing to overlook the principles that we would defend unto death if we would stop and think about it.
I get angry thinking about how cruel this death was, but thousands of babies - viable babies - are killed every year at their mother's whim. And that is legal. And there are those who will disregard the "right to life" of the baby in favor of a "right to privacy" for the mother. It's "constitutional"'; the SCOTUS said so...
I'm not saying this mother isn't guilty; I'm not saying the IMPD cop isn't guilty of something. I just think it's better that we all step back and let the System do its job. Get upset if the State doesn't prove its case against either of them, if you wish. But remember, at some point, you may wish to have the kind of rights you're ready to deny them right now.