As one of my English professors would say "It was a unconventional spelling ".You misspelled Lysdexic.
Great movie, great car and nothing says get of my lawn like a M1 Garrarnd pointed at the old brain pan.
That’s more Hood than Walmart. You have your opinion and I have mines!
Yeah. Thats one of those movies I watched once and really enjoyed. But I'm not sure I want to watch again. So many emotions in that movie. And not all good ones, so the urge to watch again isnt strong.Great movie, great car and nothing says get of my lawn like a M1 Garrarnd pointed at the old brain pan.
MH
interestingly the pronunciation of "ask" as "axe" may be found in the Canterbury Tales.
If you are a Grammar Nazi, (or just want to get better at punctuation) this is a good book:
Eats, Shoots & Leaves: The Zero Tolerance Approach to Punctuation
Wiki:
The title of the book is a syntactic ambiguity—a verbal fallacy arising from an ambiguous or erroneous grammatical construction—and derived from a joke (a variant on a "bar joke") about bad punctuation:
A panda walks into a café. He orders a sandwich, eats it, then draws a gun and fires two shots in the air.
"Why?" asks the confused waiter, as the panda makes towards the exit. The panda produces a badly punctuated wildlife manual and tosses it over his shoulder.
"I'm a panda," he says at the door. "Look it up."
The waiter turns to the relevant entry in the manual and, sure enough, finds an explanation.
"Panda. Large black-and-white bear-like mammal, native to China. Eats, shoots and leaves."
The joke turns on the ambiguity of the final sentence fragment. As intended by the author, "eats" is a verb, while "shoots" and "leaves" are the verb's objects: a panda's diet consists of shoots and leaves. However, the erroneous introduction of the comma gives the mistaken impression that the sentence fragment comprises three verbs listing in sequence the panda's characteristic conduct: it eats, then it shoots, and finally it leaves.
Or a lack of. People don't seem to understand possessive. Brother's wife is different from brothers wife.There’s the overuse of apostrophes, then there’s a few around who seem to always use some kind of single backwards quote as an apostrophe.
Spelling “axel” for “axle”. I get it, car guys or people selling trailers ain’t rocket surgeons or brain scientists, but come on.
Perhaps he was being PC.That’s more Hood than Walmart. You have your opinion and I have mines!
I didn't know there was a difference...That’s more Hood than Walmart.
Real hoosiers warsh em.
Aint it nice?!I may not know what "there " to use, or how to spell correctly, but remember A) I'm the guy who builds your guns & B) I just charged you $300 for a ten dollar part.
People’s leaving them’s out bug’s me less’ than the overuse’s.Or a lack of. People don't seem to understand possessive. Brother's wife is different from brothers wife.