As expectedNot guilty
Scot Peterson not guilty over Parkland school shooting response
Former sheriff's deputy Scot Peterson stayed outside during a mass shooting that killed 17 people.www.bbc.com
As expectedNot guilty
Scot Peterson not guilty over Parkland school shooting response
Former sheriff's deputy Scot Peterson stayed outside during a mass shooting that killed 17 people.www.bbc.com
Unfortunately, It appears to have been broken for a while. Seems things are spiraling downward.What a ****ing joke. The "justice" system is broken.
Some people are cowards.Guess the question was “is it illegal to be a coward”?
The only first responder in a situation one is involved in is one's self.Some people are cowards.
The should NOT be any type of first responder
I'm talking about people PAID to respond.The only first responder in a situation one is involved in is one's self.
Folks seem to have forgotten this.
I'm talking about people PAID to respond.
If you're a coward, and you suffer, then I don't care.
If you take a job to respond to emergencies, and you're a coward, then I care.
I don’t like the outcome either, but based on SCOTUS, as reprehensible as he is, he did nothing illegal.I'm talking about people PAID to respond.
If you're a coward, and you suffer, then I don't care.
If you take a job to respond to emergencies, and you're a coward, then I care.
Which case would that be?I don’t like the outcome either, but based on SCOTUS, as reprehensible as he is, he did nothing illegal.
Hasn't the last few years already made that clear?The takeaway for LE is that you will get in more trouble for doing your job than NOT doing your job. Society has spoken.
No one can't, but, iv'e witnessed that the man behind you can easily push you out of a perfectly good airplane.No matter how much you are plundered, you cannot buy courage.
Easy to google if you are tech savy…Which case would that be?
That’s one of the later cases. I looked up a bunch of them one time and found about 19, if I recall correctly, that all basically say cops have no duty to protect an individual.Easy to google if you are tech savy…
Justices Rule Police Do Not Have a Constitutional Duty to Protect Someone (Published 2005)
Supreme Court rules that police do not have constitutional duty to protect person from harm, even woman who obtained court-issued protective order against violent husband which made arrest mandatory for violation; decision overturns ruling by federal appeals court in Colorado; it had permitted...www.nytimes.com
There are several.That’s one of the later cases. I looked up a bunch of them one time and found about 19, if I recall correctly, that all basically say, cops have no duty to protect an individual.
Yeah, this just more evidence of that.Hasn't the last few years already made that clear?