Feds to Telecoms: Stop Upgrading so We Can Wiretap More Easily

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • mrjarrell

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 18, 2009
    19,986
    63
    Hamilton County
    Awwww. Poor .gov can't keep up with technology so they want to slow things down and insert lots of back doors so they can more easily invade peoples privacy. All in the name of the War on People. If government can't keep up, well that's just too danged bad. Sorry that technology is getting in the way of your grasping for power. No wonder we can't make it back to the moon.

    Feds to Telecoms: Stop Upgrading so We Can Wiretap More Easily
     

    Ramen

    Sharpshooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 9, 2009
    488
    16
    And all of the technology blogs are screaming for net neutrality.

    It sounds like a great idea to give power over the internet to the people who can't keep up with the ever changing technology.
     
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Nov 17, 2008
    3,121
    36
    NE Indiana
    At one time, the techies for the NSA and its sister agencies were ahead of the tech curve where they didn't need "back doors" into systems - they had straight hacks into them. When the digital age occurred, technologies started expanding quicker than the techies could keep up and there was somewhat of a limiting of budgets, so not enough techies were hired (or so the .gov felt) to stay ahead of the curve. The answer was to go to the companies making whatever widget and encourage or force them to give access to whatever signals the .gov felt it needed. Some that didn't play ball with the .gov, like QWEST and its owner, were basically forced out of business.

    At one time, the .gov tried to tell inventors of cryptologic devices/software that their products couldn't be marketed until it was submitted to the .gov to figure out how to "break" the product in everyday use or the inventor gave them the "master key" to decode a signal at their leisure. Those that did, sold their product. Those that didn't, shelved their product.
     
    Top Bottom