ESG Score

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • GodFearinGunTotin

    Super Moderator
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Mar 22, 2011
    50,892
    113
    Mitchell

    jwamplerusa

    High drag, low speed...
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Feb 21, 2018
    4,308
    113
    Boone County
    Indiana's attorney general appears to be attacking the ESG bunch directly. Today this press release was issued

    "Attorney General Todd Rokita investigates six major banks over ESG investing as part of 20-state coalition

    Attorney General Todd Rokita announced today that Indiana and 19 other states have served six major U.S. banks with civil investigative demands, which act as a subpoena, seeking documents related to the companies’ involvement with the United Nations’ (UN) Net-Zero Banking Alliance (NZBA

    NZBA-member banks must set emissions reduction targets in their lending and investment portfolios to reach net zero by 2050. The banks under investigation are Bank of America; Citigroup; Goldman Sachs; JP Morgan Chase; Morgan Stanley; and Wells Farg

    “These banks appear to be colluding with the UN to destroy American companies that specialize in fossil fuels or otherwise depend on them for energy,” Attorney General Rokita said. “They are pushing an investment strategy designed not to maximize financial returns but to impose a leftist social and economic agenda that cannot otherwise be implemented through the ballot box

    The apparent conspiracy among the banks represents yet another scheme reflective of so-called “ESG investing” — an approach that purports to prioritize environmental, social, and governance issues over profit."

    Personally I love this. The states need to take control back from the federal government in accordance with the 9th and 10th amendments and the preamble to the Bill of Rights. Cut the federal government's support off for this sort of thing. Better yet find a way to charge them under the RICO statutes.
     
    Last edited:

    bwframe

    Loneranger
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    93   0   0
    Feb 11, 2008
    38,175
    113
    Btown Rural
    Indiana's attorney general appears to be attacking the ESG bunch directly. Today this press release was issued

    "Attorney General Todd Rokita investigates six major banks over ESG investing as part of 20-state coalition

    Attorney General Todd Rokita announced today that Indiana and 19 other states have served six major U.S. banks with civil investigative demands, which act as a subpoena, seeking documents related to the companies’ involvement with the United Nations’ (UN) Net-Zero Banking Alliance (NZBA

    NZBA-member banks must set emissions reduction targets in their lending and investment portfolios to reach net zero by 2050. The banks under investigation are Bank of America; Citigroup; Goldman Sachs; JP Morgan Chase; Morgan Stanley; and Wells Farg

    “These banks appear to be colluding with the UN to destroy American companies that specialize in fossil fuels or otherwise depend on them for energy,” Attorney General Rokita said. “They are pushing an investment strategy designed not to maximize financial returns but to impose a leftist social and economic agenda that cannot otherwise be implemented through the ballot box

    The apparent conspiracy among the banks represents yet another scheme reflective of so-called “ESG investing” — an approach that purports to prioritize environmental, social, and governance issues over profit."

    Personally I love this. The states need to take control back from the federal government in accordance with the 9th and 10th amendments and the preamble to the Bill of Rights. Cut the federal government's support off for this sort of thing. Better yet find a way to charge them under the RICO statutes.
     

    ghuns

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Nov 22, 2011
    9,340
    113
    Bump...

    Ask yourself why Anheuser-Busch or Nike would make a flaming gay dude who dresses like a woman the face of their company.

    Won't this alienate large swaths of their customer base? Yes. But they don't care.

    It's all about pumping up their ESG score.
     

    GodFearinGunTotin

    Super Moderator
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Mar 22, 2011
    50,892
    113
    Mitchell
    Bump...

    Ask yourself why Anheuser-Busch or Nike would make a flaming gay dude who dresses like a woman the face of their company.

    Won't this alienate large swaths of their customer base? Yes. But they don't care.

    It's all about pumping up their ESG score.
    This is true. You know why else they do it? Because the left organizes better. We meme better but we simply don’t organize and act as cohesively as they do. We’ll still buy our Natty Lites and our Nike appearal (especially if it has our favorite sports team on it). They won’t feel our wrath.
     

    Twangbanger

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    21   0   0
    Oct 9, 2010
    7,098
    113
    Aand that's part of the reason why we need the "Green New Deal." To make sure revenue continues to flow to companies with high ESG scores, so they continue to make an attractive addition to institutional retirement portfolios (think teachers, Unions, etc.).

    I'm not a Finance ace, but suspect that even if the underlying positions lose money, whoever is managing the retirement portfolios of these institutions can probably still make money off management fees, if their market share of "woke" institution fund management increases significantly, especially if this is happening while the rest of the market is also losing money in a secular downturn. The profitability of fund management isn't 100% driven by performance of the underlying positions. It's probably also driven somewhat by market share. If everybody is losing, but you're getting an increasing share of the fund management pie, that counts for something. As long as you don't underperform too badly, at the macroscopic level, large fund management is probably approximately like selling insurance.

    Underperforming an Index isn't really a "thing" if everyone in the Index is equally "woke" and performing roughly equally.
     
    Last edited:
    Top Bottom