Changes at FNC- it's about time. :-)

[Ingomike]

Both are lies.
one believes his own crap

Are you an expert on the intricacies of declassification for a President?

 

[Ingomike]

Former President Trump in a new interview asserted presidents don’t have to go through a formal process to declassify sensitive documents and can do so “even by thinking about it.”

He can. There is a thread to explain it to you.

 

[NoSaintJoe]

He can. There is a thread to explain it to you.

Sorry, but that’s just dumb.

Trump’s claim of declassifying documents ‘by thinking about it’ is mocked by legal experts

Former President Trump says he could declassify documents just “by thinking about it” — an outlandish claim that drew howls of outrage from legal experts. Speaking to Fox News’s Sean Hannity on Wednesday evening, Trump asserted there is no need for the commander-in-chief to declassify documents...

news.yahoo.com

Trump can't 'declassify documents by saying so,' GOP Sen. Barrasso acknowledges when pressed​

Trump can't 'declassify documents by saying so,' GOP Sen. Barrasso acknowledges when pressed

Wyoming Republican Sen. John Barrasso acknowledged on Sunday -- only after being pressed -- that Trump cannot declassify documents simply by declaring it so

abcnews.go.com

 

[Ingomike]

Sorry, but that’s just dumb.

Trump’s claim of declassifying documents ‘by thinking about it’ is mocked by legal experts

Former President Trump says he could declassify documents just “by thinking about it” — an outlandish claim that drew howls of outrage from legal experts. Speaking to Fox News’s Sean Hannity on Wednesday evening, Trump asserted there is no need for the commander-in-chief to declassify documents...

news.yahoo.com

It would be to trolls that get news from yahoo. Read the constitution. Who is it that can tell a President how he must perform his duties?

 

[NoSaintJoe]

It would be to trolls that get news from yahoo.

And people that have worked in an S-2 and a G-2

 

[Ingomike]

And people that have worked in an S-2 and a G-2

Read the constitution. Who is it that can tell a President how he must perform his duties?

 

[NoSaintJoe]

Read the constitution. Who is it that can tell a President how he must perform his duties?

The other branches of a co equal tripartite Constitutional Republic.
if there are no checks and balances, then we have a king who answers to no one. That’s not freedom.

we don’t elect kings, the whole “no man is above the law” thing.

believe as you wish, but I won’t give Obama or Biden the authority you demand for Trump.

 

[KLB]

The other branches of a co equal tripartite Constitutional Republic.
if there are no checks and balances, then we have a king who answers to no one. That’s not freedom.

we don’t elect kings, the whole “no man is above the law” thing.

believe as you wish, but I won’t give Obama or Biden the authority you demand for Trump.

I think you need to read more.

Try this for starters.

The Business Newspaper

Ulasan Slot

thebusinessnewspaper.com

 

[Ingomike]

The other branches of a co equal tripartite Constitutional Republic.
if there are no checks and balances, then we have a king who answers to no one. That’s not freedom.

we don’t elect kings, the whole “no man is above the law” thing.

believe as you wish, but I won’t give Obama or Biden the authority you demand for Trump.

Look up the definition of co-equal. Neither the congress nor SCOTUS can tell a president how to do his job. Can the President tell congress how to handle committees? Nope. Can a President tell SCOTUS what cases to hear? Nope.

But somehow magically the co-equal branches can tell a President how he must handle his documents in the fevered imagination of those with TDS…

 

[Ingomike]

I think you need to read more.

Try this for starters.

The Business Newspaper

Ulasan Slot

thebusinessnewspaper.com

Then he should read the truth about where obummers docs are stored in an unsecured furniture store in Chicago I believe.

And Judge Bermans ruling that Bill Clintons tapes kept in a sock drawer were his as long as he said they were his private papers…

 

[NoSaintJoe]

Look up the definition of co-equal. Neither the congress nor SCOTUS can tell a president how to do his job. Can the President tell congress how to handle committees? Nope. Can a President tell SCOTUS what cases to hear? Nope.

But somehow magically the co-equal branches can tell a President how he must handle his documents in the fevered imagination of those with TDS…

Sorry, no
It doesn’t work that way, no matter how many times you close your eyes and wish it did.
I’m done trying to convince the convinced

 

[Ingomike]

Sorry, no
It doesn’t work that way, no matter how many times you close your eyes and wish it did.
I’m done trying to convince the convinced

I get it, it is hard to discuss this kind of thing with others that have already been researching this and then you find out that your news sources are lying to you because of poltics…

 

[NoSaintJoe]

I get it, it is hard to discuss this kind of thing with others that have already been researching this and then you find out that your news sources are lying to you because of poltics…

Yeah, that’s it.
have a good night

 

[Ingomike]

Yeah, that’s it.
have a good night

Good night to you as well. A little reading for you that may simlify the issue.

“U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson in Washington D.C. ultimately rejected Judicial Watch's suit by concluding there was no provision in the Presidential Records Act to force the National Archives to seize records from a former president.”

“But Jackson's ruling — along with the Justice Department's arguments that preceded it — made some other sweeping declarations that have more direct relevance to the FBI's decision to seize handwritten notes and files Trump took with him to Mar-a-Lago. The most relevant is that a president's discretion on what are personal vs. official records is far-reaching and solely his, as is his ability to declassify or destroy records at will.”

"Under the statutory scheme established by the PRA, the decision to segregate personal materials from Presidential records is made by the President, during the President's term and in his sole discretion," Jackson wrote in her March 2012 decision, which was never appealed.”

"Since the President is completely entrusted with the management and even the disposal of Presidential records during his time in office, it would be difficult for this Court to conclude that Congress intended that he would have less authority to do what he pleases with what he considers to be his personal records," she added.”

Old case over audio tapes in Bill Clinton's sock drawer could impact Mar-a-Lago search dispute

Judge ruled in 2012 that a president's discretion to declare records "personal" is far-reaching and mostly unchallengeable.

justthenews.com

 

[BigRed]

The important question about Trump's support is whether people in leadership are unhappy with the man or his populist message.

Both?

 

[NoSaintJoe]

Article II

www.law.cornell.edu

article II if the United States Constitution.
in case anybody wants to actually read it

 

[bwframe]

Back on track...

Democrats getting ‘crushed’ by ‘ruthless’ Fox News hosts: Newsom

California Gov. Gavin Newsom says Democrats have to do a better job countering the influence Fox News has over the American electorate. “These guys are ruthless on the other side. Ruthless on the o…

thehill.com

 

[Ingomike]

Article II

www.law.cornell.edu

article II if the United States Constitution.
in case anybody wants to actually read it

Got a point?

 

[NoSaintJoe]

Got a point?

That’s is the point
the powers of the Executive…..that’s it.

you said to check the Constitution, so I did.
it’s not there

 

[NoSaintJoe]

during the President's term

could it be that you skipped this part?