What did you think?
[video=youtube_share;YJbDgymmwAg]http://youtu.be/YJbDgymmwAg[/video]
A hammer on a gun is an Antique?
Last edited:
What did you think?
[video=youtube_share;YJbDgymmwAg]http://youtu.be/YJbDgymmwAg[/video]
What did you think?
Life's too short to waste time watching Yeager or contemplating anything he might say.
Even today, I hear justifications for DA/SA guns is the so called "safety" reason when what I think is it's a poor excuse for better training. No don't tell me people can't afford the time or money for training so they don't accidentally shoot themselves. If you are willing to spend money for self defense, then you need to get trained so you can not have accidents and that goes for any system.
Life's too short to waste time watching Yeager or contemplating anything he might say.
Hahh! Likewise. FWIW, I don't own a single striker-fired pistol anymore. I have nothing against them, but as I developed a real fondness for revolvers over time, I again became drawn to the 1911 platform. All my handguns including my EDC have an external hammer, and so far I'm living a full life.That I wasn't going to bother to watch it.
I was correct.
Safety is a continuum. I think all of us recognize that a 1.5 lb trigger would be easier to accidentally touch off than a 15 lb trigger. The DA trigger simply gives you more margin of error, because no matter how well trained you are you will never reach 0% chance of an accident. It is also safer to holster, as you can place your thumb over the hammer and feel any movement if the holster were to be collapsed or obstructed. That does not mean you cannot be safe with a striker fired gun, of course, or that you can't screw up with a hammer gun.
All UDs are software issues, other than true hardware malfunctions. That does not mean that hardware is irrelevant.
Also, if you are in a situation where you need to thumb the hammer as you holster because you aren't willing to check to see if your holster is clear, then you're doing it wrong.