I'll admit I thought the same thing. I thought maybe he meant mm.Am I seeing a typo, or is "cm" supposed to mean Creedmoor?
Cause if you have a 6.5 centimeter gun, I wanna come play at your range!
Not many would let you fire a 2.5"+ tube. Prolly some sort of anti-tank round.
No one neck sizes anymore. Shoulder bump for clearance only with a full length die.Get a neck sizing for for the bolt action and keep the brass separate.
One has a bit more versatility when using a neck bushing die with bullet tension and then set the shoulder back when its needed. I get much better life out of my cases that I spent considerable time forming to just get 3-5 loads out of them. I can triple that with a Redding bushing die set.No one neck sizes anymore. Shoulder bump for clearance only with a full length die.
Neck tension has nothing to do with FL resizing vs neck sizing only. It has to do with whether you are using a bushing, mandrel, or combination of both and at what sizes, if you Anneal each firing, testing each as you go accounting for brass spring back. Further more, the ignition is very controlled by primer crush in seating depth. Whether you use graphite lube during a mandrel or button (no bueno) process, if you use it for bullet seating, etc has a dramatic affect. Neck sizing only is just not consistent, as your brass grows and grows, and eventually you have to fill length resize anyways. This is completely inconsistent. I don’t know a single Benchrest or f-class competition shooter who neck sizes, everyone stopped years ago and everyone is in agreement, including every record holder and winners of every discipline across the US.One has a bit more versatility when using a neck bushing die with bullet tension and then set the shoulder back when its needed. I get much better life out of my cases that I spent considerable time forming to just get 3-5 loads out of them. I can triple that with a Redding bushing die set.
Lots of re-loaders still just neck size brass.
Here’s a 10 round group at 100 yards. I understand what works for you, works ok. And it did for a long time, but times have changed and people much smarter than me have figured out why. We must adapt to improve upon the sport.One has a bit more versatility when using a neck bushing die with bullet tension and then set the shoulder back when its needed. I get much better life out of my cases that I spent considerable time forming to just get 3-5 loads out of them. I can triple that with a Redding bushing die set.
Lots of re-loaders still just neck size brass.
Wow, it amazing how you know the processes I go through when I'm loading.Neck tension has nothing to do with FL resizing vs neck sizing only. It has to do with whether you are using a bushing, mandrel, or combination of both and at what sizes, if you Anneal each firing, testing each as you go accounting for brass spring back. Further more, the ignition is very controlled by primer crush in seating depth. Whether you use graphite lube during a mandrel or button (no bueno) process, if you use it for bullet seating, etc has a dramatic affect. Neck sizing only is just not consistent, as your brass grows and grows, and eventually you have to fill length resize anyways. This is completely inconsistent. I don’t know a single Benchrest or f-class competition shooter who neck sizes, everyone stopped years ago and everyone is in agreement, including every record holder and winners of every discipline across the US.
Your bullet seating depth is the second most important thing to tune next to powder charge and ignition. When you neck size only, your shoulder consistently changes as your brass grows, then changes again when you can’t chamber and have to full length size. Because your bullet to lands metric indexes off the shoulder, and not the base, you are consistently changing your seating depth each load by neck sizing only.
If your shoulder changes, your seating depth changes also, even at the same oal. I have many brass that have been loaded well past 10 loadings annealing and full length resizing.