Mandated vaccines or weekly testing for employers of 100+ people.......

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Status
    Not open for further replies.

    buckwacker

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    11   0   0
    Mar 23, 2012
    3,085
    97
    Pfizer has full FDA approval. Last I read, Moderna had filed, or was planning to file, for full approval.

    Full approval has little to do with safety, but rather efficacy. Safety is largely established through Phase 1 and 2 clinicals. Unless safety is established, an IND doesn't even make it to Phase 3, which is what is used to establish efficacy - and which is the basis for final market authorization. (Safety is monitored through pharmacovigilance; initial market release is often referred to as a "Phase 4" clinical study.)

    Those IND data are available, and do not show particular safety concerns. Thus, for someone to claim that the vaccine is "toxic", or "poison", or otherwise unsafe, that person bears the burden to provide evidence of the claim.
    It makes it easy to discount everything else you say, when you make such specious claims. This is simply not true.

    Phase 1, 2, and 3 trials take on average 1, 2, and 3 years respectively. But now you're going to claim, we got through development, IND, clinical trials, NDA, review, and approval in months. :rolleyes:

    It was a sham process.
     

    chipbennett

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Oct 18, 2014
    10,977
    113
    Avon
    It makes it easy to discount everything else you say, when you make such specious claims. This is simply not true.

    Phase 1, 2, and 3 trials take on average 1, 2, and 3 years respectively. But now you're going to claim, we got through development, IND, clinical trials, NDA, review, and approval in months. :rolleyes:

    It was a sham process.
    Discount whatever you'd like.

    And, hey, challenge the overall approval process. It certainly isn't immune (pun intended?) to political and financial pressure. For example, just look at the controversy over the recent Aducanumab (Alzheimer's drug) approval, over the objection of the adcomm, that led to several adcomm member resignations.

    Development (again) has been happening for decades. IND is clinical trials. And averages are just that: averages. NDA, review, and approval did happen very quickly - no challenging that. But the supporting safety/efficacy data are there. This is an unusual case, in that, thanks to the EUA, millions of doses were administered prior to final market authorization.
     

    buckwacker

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    11   0   0
    Mar 23, 2012
    3,085
    97
    Discount whatever you'd like.

    And, hey, challenge the overall approval process. It certainly isn't immune (pun intended?) to political and financial pressure. For example, just look at the controversy over the recent Aducanumab (Alzheimer's drug) approval, over the objection of the adcomm, that led to several adcomm member resignations.

    Development (again) has been happening for decades. IND is clinical trials. And averages are just that: averages. NDA, review, and approval did happen very quickly - no challenging that. But the supporting safety/efficacy data are there. This is an unusual case, in that, thanks to the EUA, millions of doses were administered prior to final market authorization.
    So are you saying they've been developing the covid vaccine for years, or the mrna technology? Technology yes, but not in humans. How do you develope a vaccine for something that you don't know exists? Pharma companies don't participate in pure crap shoots. We went from no such thing as covid19 to a "safe" vaccine in months. I can't help you if you think that's possible. Hell, they now had to change the criteria for efficacy because it didn't do what they originally promised it would, prevent infection.
     

    rhamersley

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 9, 2016
    3,737
    113
    Danville
    So are you saying they've been developing the covid vaccine for years, or the mrna technology? Technology yes, but not in humans. How do you develope a vaccine for something that you don't know exists? Pharma companies don't participate in pure crap shoots. We went from no such thing as covid19 to a "safe" vaccine in months. I can't help you if you think that's possible. Hell, they now had to change the criteria for efficacy because it didn't do what they originally promised it would, prevent infection.
    Wasting your time....
    1632324157733.png
     

    Alpo

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Sep 23, 2014
    13,877
    113
    Indy Metro Area
    Dig a hole. Throw the dirt back in.
    Dig the same hole. Throw the dirt back in.
    Dig it again. Throw....

    ...you get the picture. This stuff has been hashed around repeatedly for a year. Chipbennett provided (in my estimation) the clearest summary of everything you guys are recycling once again.

    But, that's INGO.
     

    buckwacker

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    11   0   0
    Mar 23, 2012
    3,085
    97
    Dig a hole. Throw the dirt back in.
    Dig the same hole. Throw the dirt back in.
    Dig it again. Throw....

    ...you get the picture. This stuff has been hashed around repeatedly for a year. Chipbennett provided (in my estimation) the clearest summary of everything you guys are recycling once again.

    But, that's INGO.
    Are you digging or throwing, I'm getting confused. :):
     

    jsharmon7

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    119   0   0
    Nov 24, 2008
    7,827
    113
    Freedonia
    I’m trying to look at both sides of this. When I Google any of these medical professionals, the only thing that comes up is links to the Veritas story. Is there anything out there to show who these people are and confirm they’re “federal doctors?” Otherwise, this could just as easily be me and my idiot friends sitting around talking.
     

    Keith_Indy

    Master
    Rating - 95.2%
    20   1   0
    Mar 10, 2009
    3,241
    113
    Noblesville
    I’m trying to look at both sides of this. When I Google any of these medical professionals, the only thing that comes up is links to the Veritas story. Is there anything out there to show who these people are and confirm they’re “federal doctors?” Otherwise, this could just as easily be me and my idiot friends sitting around talking.

    Well, at least the one lady being interviewed did show their government issued ID badge. Didn't watch the whole thing, so maybe more.
     

    Tombs

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 13, 2011
    12,089
    113
    Martinsville
    Pfizer has full FDA approval. Last I read, Moderna had filed, or was planning to file, for full approval.

    Full approval has little to do with safety, but rather efficacy. Safety is largely established through Phase 1 and 2 clinicals. Unless safety is established, an IND doesn't even make it to Phase 3, which is what is used to establish efficacy - and which is the basis for final market authorization. (Safety is monitored through pharmacovigilance; initial market release is often referred to as a "Phase 4" clinical study.)

    Those IND data are available, and do not show particular safety concerns. Thus, for someone to claim that the vaccine is "toxic", or "poison", or otherwise unsafe, that person bears the burden to provide evidence of the claim.

    Pfizer does not have full FDA approval, this is misinformation.

    The vaccine they had approved will not be available for years. If it was made available currently, all other vaccines would have to be removed from the market due to the EUA.
    Calling it "legally distinct but the same" is BS. The one that is approved doesn't have the same legal immunity as the one you can receive from them. If it was FDA approved, you could sue if you were injured by it.
     

    Tombs

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 13, 2011
    12,089
    113
    Martinsville
    You know, saying that, well everyone in the records we studied recovered from myopericarditis, is not all that reassuring.

    1 case per 1000 inoculations. Doesn't seem all that safe to me.


    Found via https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...eath-rate-within-5-years-risk-higher-dying-v/

    Yeah they like to downplay how serious that condition is by not reminding people that your heart doesn't "heal" from it. So your lifespan is significantly reduced, and odds of complications later in life go up dramatically.

    The average person has no idea what myocarditis is and what it means long term. And that's intentional.
     

    Tombs

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 13, 2011
    12,089
    113
    Martinsville
    I’m trying to look at both sides of this. When I Google any of these medical professionals, the only thing that comes up is links to the Veritas story. Is there anything out there to show who these people are and confirm they’re “federal doctors?” Otherwise, this could just as easily be me and my idiot friends sitting around talking.

    I would imagine efforts were made, before the interview, to scrub available data to prevent doxxing.

    Dropping your full name and profession would otherwise be a recipe to have people show up at your house.
     

    NKBJ

    at the ark
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Apr 21, 2010
    6,240
    149
    Just watched a video clip of a doctor telling about a pharmaceutical company telling employees that when they test positive for the bug they don't have to stay home if they are vaccinated. Still wrapping my brain around it.
     

    Tombs

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 13, 2011
    12,089
    113
    Martinsville
    Just watched a video clip of a doctor telling about a pharmaceutical company telling employees that when they test positive for the bug they don't have to stay home if they are vaccinated. Still wrapping my brain around it.


    These people either have no sense and no understanding of the illness, or they're malicious.
    The vaccine does not prevent covid, it does not prevent spreading covid, and it's debatable as to whether it reduces viral load or not. It's just another percentage gain of defense against it, at best.

    The intellectually honest who buy into all this need to realize this. If you're vaccinated, you still need a mask, you need to test regularly because you could have unnoticeable symptoms, and your viral load can be higher or lower than an unvaccinated person. You will also need boosters to program your immune system for new variants.

    Like I said, it's a percentage risk reduction for covid at best.
     

    NKBJ

    at the ark
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Apr 21, 2010
    6,240
    149
    These people either have no sense and no understanding of the illness, or they're malicious.
    The vaccine does not prevent covid, it does not prevent spreading covid, and it's debatable as to whether it reduces viral load or not. It's just another percentage gain of defense against it, at best.

    The intellectually honest who buy into all this need to realize this. If you're vaccinated, you still need a mask, you need to test regularly because you could have unnoticeable symptoms, and your viral load can be higher or lower than an unvaccinated person. You will also need boosters to program your immune system for new variants.

    Like I said, it's a percentage risk reduction for covid at best.
    It was included in yesterday's news in case you'd like to watch.

    Some video of the maniacs down under was included as well.
    Looking at Australia by example it appears they are correct in their assessment, that police officers here have some unpleasant decision making coming their way.

     

    KLB

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Sep 12, 2011
    23,232
    77
    Porter County
    I’m trying to look at both sides of this. When I Google any of these medical professionals, the only thing that comes up is links to the Veritas story. Is there anything out there to show who these people are and confirm they’re “federal doctors?” Otherwise, this could just as easily be me and my idiot friends sitting around talking.
    I have no knowledge of who they are, but I do know that Veritas seems to be careful about what they publish. They are in court a lot, and lying about stuff like this would kill them there.
     

    tim87tr

    Freedom lover
    Rating - 100%
    8   0   0
    Jul 3, 2010
    1,426
    113
    Eastern IL
    I’m trying to look at both sides of this. When I Google any of these medical professionals, the only thing that comes up is links to the Veritas story. Is there anything out there to show who these people are and confirm they’re “federal doctors?” Otherwise, this could just as easily be me and my idiot friends sitting around talking.
    Well, at least the one lady being interviewed did show their government issued ID badge. Didn't watch the whole thing, so maybe more.
    I started the Fed Whistleblower thread:


    I agree it is tabloid style made for TV and I personally don't like that sort of thing. It's also what's effective, just a chance at getting people to use their brain in a censored social media world. Where has common sense and cognitive thinking abilities gone?

    I'm going to add the follow up videos as they are released. My thoughts were to just get the info out there for people to absorb, get the synapses firing, and make a damn decision for themselves and others they care about. A lot of division and arguing, exactly what any evil entity would want, less focus on them.

    I have strong opinions on what I believe. After a 19 month crap show I have no idea how anyone believes the US government and others worldwide, zero credibility. A draconian push for a shot resulting in an extreme loss of freedoms makes no sense at all.
     

    Magyars

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    39   0   0
    Mar 6, 2010
    9,593
    113
    Delaware County Freehold
    I’m trying to look at both sides of this. When I Google any of these medical professionals, the only thing that comes up is links to the Veritas story. Is there anything out there to show who these people are and confirm they’re “federal doctors?” Otherwise, this could just as easily be me and my idiot friends sitting around talking.
    It is difficult to get the facts. Put ten " experts" in a room and you'll get a dozen different answers.
    My gut tells me that the FedGov doesn't have the best interest of the public at heart.
    -ZPNNiFH96Xw.jpg
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.
    Top Bottom