That's why I'm asking you I'm not sure myself.
-
Be sure to read this post! Beware of scammers. https://www.indianagunowners.com/threads/classifieds-new-online-payment-guidelines-rules-paypal-venmo-zelle-etc.511734/
Expand Court
- Thread starter BigRed
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana
Member Benefits:
Fewer Ads! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
all the branches are co-equal as I understand...
I need to get the constitution out and read it in its entirety again. It's been over 30+ years since I've studied it in its entirety.
I also have this book I read many years ago. Very educational.
Hillsdale College Bookstore
You can't authenticate your "winning votes." You never could.
So who needs to move on from this stolen election?
Interesting thing I've been tossing around recently, and that's the thought of abolishing the secret ballot. Now it wouldn't be something that would be made public so that everyone could see who you voted for, but what about a system that would allow challenges to be officially confirmed by the person who cast the ballot? I'm not exactly sure how, but I think it can be done, and would solve a lot of issues.
How do you explain more votes than registered voters?
According to the latest published information by the U.S. Census Bureau, based on their Voting and Registration Supplement to the Current Population Survey (CPS), ( here , table 4.A), in 2018 there were around 153,066,000 registered voters in the U.S.
Over 159 million voted.
So if you go by that data there was approximately 3-4 million extra votes, or more.
Last edited:
It's not meant to pass, they are introducing this Bill knowing that it will not pass in the Senate due to the Filibuster. When it fails the Dem's will use it as an excuse to end the Filibuster so that "Important" legislation will not be hamstrung by those evil Republicans.
They have to end the Filibuster before they can actually pack the Court. That needs to happen before Biden's Commission on the Supreme Court issues their report in 6 months at which time I fully expect it to recommend the Court be expanded.
On a side note I see that the usual suspects are at it again stirring the pot trying to get a thread locked, a member banned or derail the thread onto another topic when something they would rather not see is being discussed. Surprised anyone still falls for their tricks.
They have to end the Filibuster before they can actually pack the Court. That needs to happen before Biden's Commission on the Supreme Court issues their report in 6 months at which time I fully expect it to recommend the Court be expanded.
On a side note I see that the usual suspects are at it again stirring the pot trying to get a thread locked, a member banned or derail the thread onto another topic when something they would rather not see is being discussed. Surprised anyone still falls for their tricks.
“...usual suspects” don’t get a member banned. You must be new here.
Last sentence should be purple but I am on my iPhone right now.
You made it sound like some people get other people banned. It doesn’t work that way. We ban ourselves. Trust me I know. I’ve been there.
- Jan 12, 2012
- 27,286
- 113
1. Its not the person of Trump. He did in fact act on a number of things many of us considered long overdue but that doesn't make it a personality cult like the Bernie crew.
2. Forcible reeducation camps have matured as a political issue when we have members of congress calling for exclusion of conservatives from the public square at all levels, holding us "accountable" for our votes, and subjecting us to forcible reeducation.
3. Much of our ongoing stability as a nation had come from observing customs which are not constitutionally demanded but still very important to our national wellbeing. It is very problematic that we have leftists eyeing these customs not with respect but rather maniacal grins with a bucket of fuel in one hand and matches in the other.
Last edited:
The only thing that needs to be tossed around is voter authentication.
The lack of authentication is the only way you could cheat your way into this "win."
It would be foolish you or anyone to think we will EVER forget about this or "let it go." Never gonna happen. NEVER.
Just so you know...
I personally think Indiana has it down pretty good. Now if 49 other states could do the same I believe the vote would be much more secure and elections would be more trustworthy. As it is now I'd say half the state's do not come close to Indiana voting laws and requirements. It isn't 100% perfect but I believe we do a good job.
Last edited:
Anyone who thinks showing proper identification is voter suppression he’s full of ****. It’s simply an excuse to get more voters on the Democrat voter rolls. You need a damn ID card or a drivers license to do pretty much anything else in society so what in the holy hell is wrong with having to show one to vote?
