Remember that we have to vote for Trump because, if he were president, his administration would never do something like this.
Man you just can not leave this alone can you.
Put your butt in that chair. Fight off the swarms of idiots and media every minute of every day and then get back with us on what you have accomplished.
None of use would survive this madness.
Not making any excuses. Just being realistic. This is completely rogue.
Man you just can not leave this alone can you.
Put your butt in that chair. Fight off the swarms of idiots and media every minute of every day and then get back with us on what you have accomplished.
None of use would survive this madness.
Not making any excuses. Just being realistic. This is completely rogue.
Man you just can not leave this alone can you.
Put your butt in that chair. Fight off the swarms of idiots and media every minute of every day and then get back with us on what you have accomplished.
None of use would survive this madness.
Not making any excuses. Just being realistic. This is completely rogue.
2 things: this is relying on it to get to SCOTUS and for SCOTUS to do something about it. Conservatives don't always pan out like we think: see Roberts."Too big, and too heavy, to be comfortably fired with one hand"?
Who are they trying to kid?
This wording, if followed, could affect MUCH more than just AR/AK pistols.
I have a Taurus Raging Bull chambered in .454 Casull that has an 8-3/8" ported barrel with a full under-lug.
I know very few people who can fire that thing one-handed.
Besides that, who ever said a handgun had to be fired one-handed?
SO glad the "Notorious A.C.B." (as Glenn Beck calls her) is now on S.C.O.T.U.S.
I believe he has already signed an EO disallowing agencies from doing this.How can you criticize Trump for rogue bureaucrats while he ishaving to fight them off just like the rest of us? If he were exempt from their behavior or directing it I would agree with you, but the fact of the matter is that he personally has just as big a problem with them as anyone.
Yes, I'd have to look at the timing, but he recently put out an EO impacting some fed gov employees. Could be retaliation for that.I see this as yet another attempt by career employees of the federal government to separate Trump from the conservative base.
The swamp is dirty and deep.
Perhaps it is too big for one person and something like this would happen were I president. But I didn't run for president; I didn't say that I could handle the job; and I am not trying to convince the American people to reelect me. "Better than I could do" is not a good enough standard for a surgeon, a pilot, or an auto mechanic, and it's certainly not the standard that should earn reelection as president.
Once a problem is clearly out of hand, the first response is to stop making it worse. Instead, Trump has dramatically grown the federal, adding 2,000,000 federal jobs. (For comparison, Obama actually reduced the number of federal jobs during his presidency.)
You can like him and vote for him if you want, but it's obvious that Trump isn't a small government guy, isn't a fiscal responsibility guy, isn't a 2nd Amendment guy, and isn't a 4th Amendment guy. If you think that you have to vote for him to protect any of those, you're fooling yourself.
Okay, this is Trump's 2A litmus test.
He wrote himself the authority to fire Federal employees for everything from actual insubordination to telling the truth about their research, so this would appear to be the ideal situation to test these newly self-appointed powers.
He has the ability and means to act and a real deadline...if he doesn't take action before the election there is a real possibility no action will be taken at all...or worse. It's up to Trump to choose the 2A and its supporters. It's up to Trump to do the right thing.
Honest question: Why should he?
He knows you all are going to vote for him no matter what.
ETA:
Even if he loses the election he could take action to fire these guys before he leaves office. It does't seem likely the next administration would act to reel these guys in. It really is up to Trump to take action on behalf of his most ardent supporters, even if there isn't much in it for him.
I'm honestly curious to see how this plays out.
Have you got a link for the highlighted part? Since there are about 2.1 million federal jobs total, are you saying that before Trump there were only 100K? Call me skeptical.
I have nothing to add to the conversation, just here to read.
I have nothing to add to the conversation, just here to read.