What do you think about Mitt Romney considering another 2016 run?

[ArcadiaGP]

Bob Schieffer: Romney may consider 2016 run if Jeb Bush doesn?t

He could run on "I told you so"... that would be a concise message.

Personally, I'd prefer Rand or Cruz... but I never had anything against Romney. It would be harder for the media to rehash their attacks against him, I would think.

 

[jamil]

BTDT. Plus, it's clear that Jeb is the new darling.

 

[dvd1955]

BTDT. Plus, it's clear that Jeb is the new darling.

I could never vote for a democrat, but can we really survive another Bush economic failure? Isn't two enough?

 

[Kutnupe14]

Rand, Romney, or Cruz.... no, nein, nyet. Right now, I'd rather we hire an official coin flipper to be Chief Exec.

 

[zippy23]

this proves their stupidity. Romney thinking about running again, or the establishment republicans even considering it a good thing, proves they are stupid, they lost, the republican voter base didnt turn out because of romney, they have to know this, we all do. When the repubs put a conservative out there, he will win hands down. Running McCains and Romneys out there results in them losing, so for those clowns to honestly think that doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result, well einstein called that the definition of "insanity." wow

 

[ArcadiaGP]

the republican voter base didnt turn out because of romney, they have to know this, we all do.

I like to think that the past 8 years (in 16) will inspire another sort of insurgence of voters like 2010 did for the Tea Party. It's been a miserable 6 years so far for some of us.

 

[Bapak2ja]

Sure, run him out there again. I will stay home again. I will not vote for another RINO. No point in it. We just get more Democratic policies, just it is a waste of time to vote.

If we conservatives will hold a convention prior to the primary season and unite behind one candidate, we have a chance to overwhelm the RINOs. If we divide again between 4-8 conservatives, the RINOs will win the nomination and we get another McCain, Romney candidate—and another Democratic traitor to the Constitution in the White House.

A great leader must emerge to call the conservatives together to unite behind a single candidate within the GOP. Anything short of that gives the election to the traitors in Washington.

 

[Kutnupe14]

I still wish somebody would convince Mitch Daniels to take a stab at it.

 

[rockhopper46038]

The smart ones don't run.

 

[IamLegend]

For the love of God, please noooo!

 

[HoughMade]

What I'd tell Mitt about considering another run is this:

"Mitt, I admire you for a host of reasons, but it's time to hang it up. Now, go do what your'e great at and go make money."

 

[spec4]

I still wish somebody would convince Mitch Daniels to take a stab at it.

My take is he won't because the press will drag out all the crap about his wife taking off on him and then he ends up taking her back. He just , IMO doesn't want to put his family through that and I don't blame him.

 

[churchmouse]

The smart ones don't run.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^THIS^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

 

[Scutter01]

We don't need another Bush or another Clinton and Romney is unelectable. Seriously, we have 300 million candidates to choose from. Can we please stop limiting ourselves to the same five asshats every four years?

 

[ATM]

We don't need another Bush or another Clinton and Romney is unelectable. Seriously, we have 300 million candidates to choose from. Can we please stop limiting ourselves to the same five asshats every four years?

Sorry, but the American people as a whole will not tolerate anything which has not already been decided by one of only two political parties.

We're not interested in representation or representative government, we demand to be ruled by these two parties forever.

Which a$$hat actually "wins" is of such little comparative consequence as to be amusing.

 

[buckstopshere]

Sorry, but the American people as a whole will not tolerate anything which has not already been decided by one of only two political parties.

We're not interested in representation or representative government, we demand to be ruled by these two parties forever.

Which a$$hat actually "wins" is of such little comparative consequence as to be amusing.

QFT

 

[Scutter01]

Sorry, but the American people as a whole will not tolerate anything which has not already been decided by one of only two political parties.

We're not interested in representation or representative government, we demand to be ruled by these two parties forever.

Which a$$hat actually "wins" is of such little comparative consequence as to be amusing.

Forget "ruled by these two parties". Americans want to be ruled by two FAMILIES: The Bush Dynasty and the Clinton Dynasty. If not for the actions of some insane murderers, I think we would have had a Kennedy Dynasty back in the 60's.

 

[Indyhd]

Who said Oswald was insane ?
Maybe he was just 50 years ahead of his time

 

[Scutter01]

Who said Oswald was insane ?
Maybe he was just 50 years ahead of his time

Are you seriously suggesting that? I can't tell if that's meant to be a joke or not.

 

[BigMatt]

Who said Oswald was insane ?
Maybe he was just 50 years ahead of his time

IBTL