Wayne LaPierre Resigns

[Ingomike]

No you didn't. You declared it likely.

I've quoted it repeatedly.

Be honest.

I do believe it likely. I also have repeatedly said I don’t know.

You ever watch or were a participant in a coup at work? They are ugly, full of lies, and the truth is difficult if not impossible to find.

There was a power struggle at the NRA. Check

A political DA that ran on taking down the NRA. Check

Said DA uses the dirty laundry from the coup attempt to take down the organization. Check

 

[BehindBlueI's]

I do believe it likely. I also have repeatedly said I don’t know.

So they why when someone argues it's not likely you revert to you're merely arguing it's possible?

Do you not know the difference or do you assume we don't, since you're questioning other member's literacy skills? Especially after purposefully misstating other people's posts?

No, you're just deflecting from a ridiculous argument because you're incapable of ceding even the smallest point.

 

[Ingomike]

Especially after purposefully misstating other people's posts?

As are my posts being misstated. So where do I go wrong here? What points are incorrect?

A DA ran for office on getting the NRA.

A internal power struggle/coup was attempted.

The coup failed.

The dirty laundry from the coup was latched onto by the DA that was looking for an opening.

The dirty laundry was disseminated in part to demoralize members to cut off funding.

There are other possibilities besides what the DA laid out as explanations, though all are likely also illegal.

The evidence presented was not enough for me to burn down the NRA.

Those that chose to defund the NRA did so based on one political faction going after another.

 

[WebSnyper]

$7.4 doesn't sound like a "pittance" to me. That's a whole lot of suits and plane flights.

And that's what they could prove...

 

[Ingomike]

And that's what they could prove...

Like they “proved” the Trump fraud?

 

[WebSnyper]

Like they “proved” the Trump fraud?

You think it was less?

 

[Ingomike]

You think it was less?

I can only point out the track record of the politicized NY DA and courts. You must make your own conclusions. It does seem naive to accept the NRA numbers at face value when in the other politicized case the numbers were obviously stretched beyond reason.

 

[jamil]

I am the obstinate troll!

Lol. Word.

 

[jamil]

So you unquestionably believe a DA that campaigned on getting the NRA publicly and believe this is all legit.

Lol. Now you’re just ****-posting.

This can’t be serious. It’s too damn hilarious.

 

[Ingomike]

Lol. Now you’re just ****-posting.

This can’t be serious. It’s too damn hilarious.

You find it funny that a Soros funded DA that promised to attack the NRA did and has rendered the organization but a shell of its former self?

Which better serves the members, the 2017 NRA or the current model?

 

[jamil]

As are my posts being misstated. So where do I go wrong here? What points are incorrect?

A DA ran for office on getting the NRA.

A internal power struggle/coup was attempted.

The coup failed.

The dirty laundry from the coup was latched onto by the DA that was looking for an opening.

The dirty laundry was disseminated in part to demoralize members to cut off funding.

There are other possibilities besides what the DA laid out as explanations, though all are likely also illegal.

The evidence presented was not enough for me to burn down the NRA.

Those that chose to defund the NRA did so based on one political faction going after another.

I think you’re asserting some facts not in evidence and sweeping a lot of relevant details under a rug you named “dirty laundry”. It’s the dirty laundry part that you’ve swept away that has caused supporters to stop supporting the NRA until it gets its **** together.

 

[Ingomike]

I think you’re asserting some facts not in evidence and sweeping a lot of relevant details under a rug you named “dirty laundry”. It’s the dirty laundry part that you’ve swept away that has caused supporters to stop supporting the NRA until it gets its **** together.

The “dirty laundry“ came either from the losers of the coup, and or the DA who probably got her info from the losers of the coup.

Is everything else accurate?

 

[jamil]

You find it funny that a Soros funded DA that promised to attack the NRA did and has rendered the organization but a shell of its former self?

Which better serves the members, the 2017 NRA or the current model?

So you think mallard ducks **** green because they have green feathers around their heads. I mean your post can’t possibly mean anything else. You Mallard truther.

 

[jamil]

The “dirty laundry“ came either from the losers of the coup, and or the DA who probably got her info from the losers of the coup.

Is everything else accurate?

Oh. So you don’t like doing laundry.

 

[BugI02]

So you are saying you know 100% what happened, because others agree with you in a forum? And further we will never hear anything further concerning this? All the shoes have dropped we now know all there is to know about this?

It all be interesting to me to see what comes out over the next twenty years in the books, memoirs, and interviews. As I said I do not know…

He's saying that Occam's Razor has cut your theory's throat

 

[BugI02]

Hey now, according to Ingomike I am the obstinate troll! I refuse to share the podium.

I insist you redirect any negativity at me!

Sanctmoniusly whatever and sacrilegious are not the same!

 

[BugI02]

I do believe it likely. I also have repeatedly said I don’t know.

You ever watch or were a participant in a coup at work? They are ugly, full of lies, and the truth is difficult if not impossible to find.

There was a power struggle at the NRA. Check

A political DA that ran on taking down the NRA. Check

Said DA uses the dirty laundry from the coup attempt to take down the organization. Check

The DA HAD THE RECEIPTS, WLP knew it and declined to deny the accusations in his testimony because he was under oath and the legal jeopardy from perjuring himself outweighed any possible penalty from financial mismanagement

 

[jamil]

 

[BugI02]

 

[Twangbanger]

As are my posts being misstated. So where do I go wrong here? What points are incorrect?

A DA ran for office on getting the NRA.

A internal power struggle/coup was attempted.

The coup failed.

The dirty laundry from the coup was latched onto by the DA that was looking for an opening.

The dirty laundry was disseminated in part to demoralize members to cut off funding.

There are other possibilities besides what the DA laid out as explanations, though all are likely also illegal.

The evidence presented was not enough for me to burn down the NRA.

Those that chose to defund the NRA did so based on one political faction going after another.

You remember the Reagan-era statement from the swamp creature who said, "Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they're not out to get you?"

I think the principle here is - just because somebody's out to get you, doesn't mean you're not a crook.

And the NRA, in court, is basically saying WLP was a crook who took from them. The organization you "don't want to burn down" is presenting themselves as victimized by him. And Wayne's not really denying it, either.

These stupid f*cks did the unpardonable: they provided Letitia James with validation. They made the "turd with a wig" look right on something.

I think we all would have loved nothing more than for turd-with-a-wig to come up with a big, fat, zero on this. Making dumbasses look right...it's not a good look.