U.S. Supreme Court -Constitution is Void

[Duncan]

U.S. Supreme Court Issues Landmark Decision: Constitution is Void


It make you wonder ...
Is Dr. Eugene Schroder right ..
Constitution: Fact or Fiction ... the Constitution has been effectively set aside since 1933
Constitutional Issues, War and Emergency Powers, Central Planning and Corporations

 

[Tryin']

OK. . . Change it. Wait, we can't. Thanks for the info!

 

[CarmelHP]

U.S. Supreme Court Issues Landmark Decision: Constitution is Void

I love the way crazy unsupported assertions are presented as fact. Did you even read any of the decisions in this case or just swallow this folderol whole?

 

[eatsnopaste]

So he's going to show his despair over the collapse of our constitution by writing a book? God Bless America!

 

[Eddie]

I'm not going to dump a ton of research into this but from doing some googling it looks like the guy who is the subject of the article is a resident of Georgia who is suing over who is allowed to bid on operating tour boats at Niagra Falls, New York.

I don't know anything about competitive bidding statutes in New York but typically a U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decision is final. You don't appeal to the Supreme Court directly, you file a writ of certiorari and ask them to review the case. The Supreme Court has to deem the case to be of sufficient national importance to grant it review.

I know from extensive litigation here in Indiana that often times only a taxpayer in the community may object to how bidding is conducted. See http://www.in.gov/judiciary/opinions/pdf/08100503mpb.pdf so it is entirely possible that a Georgia resident has no standing to complain about how a city in New York handles competitive bidding.

At any rate all the Supreme court did was say that they declined to hear the man's case which is probably typical of most requests for a writ of certiorari.

 

[CarmelHP]

I'm not going to dump a ton of research into this but from doing some googling it looks like the guy who is the subject of the article is a resident of Georgia who is suing over who is allowed to bid on operating tour boats at Niagra Falls, New York.

Since this sounded particularly nutty, I decide to go to Lexis and read the entire procedural history. Mr. Windsor is a whack-job. His son apparently has a company that sells tickets. The Maid of the Mist company that operates the tour boats gave his son's company a credit agreement for on-line sales of ticket vouchers. The price charged by his son's company jacked the price to about 80% higher than walk-in prices at the Maid of the Mist, but gave on-line customers the impression that they were getting a discount and were reserving a time for boarding, neither of which was true. Customers started complaining to MOTM. After some back and forth between the two and attempts by MOTM to compromise, MOTM first asked and then demanded that goofball's company stop selling the vouchers. They, of course, as goofballs are wont to do, refused and started demanding "seven figures" in damages and asserted the right to sell vouchers in perpetuity even though there was no such agreement. MOTM sues to enjoin them and goofballs bring loads of bogus counterclaims. MOTM wins case and is awarded fees. Goofball's appeal and everything is affirmed, except the fee award is sent back for modification. Goofballs then start, individually pro se, though the case involved their corporation, motions to depose various judges, 60 or so other goofy motion, motions to find that the judge is biased and corrupt (why? their reason was because he ruled against their obviously righteous motion). They continue filing motions and lawsuits against everybody in sight, judges, other officials that they had grudges against, etc. Finally, the district court has enough and sanctions them, court of appeals affirms and they file for cert. The USSC, recognizing that there is no reason to further waste resources on goofballs that had been given extensive process, way beyond due process, denies taking it up. This means, of course, that the Constitution is VOID! What are you finding so hard to understand about this, Eddie? Are you one of them thar Illuminatis or something?

 

[Eddie]

I'm just a tool for the man. Proppin' up a void constitution and ruining the day for whack-jobs.

 

[Rookie]

Since this sounded particularly nutty, I decide to go to Lexis and read the entire procedural history. Mr. Windsor is a whack-job. His son apparently has a company that sells tickets. The Maid of the Mist company that operates the tour boats gave his son's company a credit agreement for on-line sales of ticket vouchers. The price charged by his son's company jacked the price to about 80% higher than walk-in prices at the Maid of the Mist, but gave on-line customers the impression that they were getting a discount and were reserving a time for boarding, neither of which was true. Customers started complaining to MOTM. After some back and forth between the two and attempts by MOTM to compromise, MOTM first asked and then demanded that goofball's company stop selling the vouchers. They, of course, as goofballs are wont to do, refused and started demanding "seven figures" in damages and asserted the right to sell vouchers in perpetuity even though there was no such agreement. MOTM sues to enjoin them and goofballs bring loads of bogus counterclaims. MOTM wins case and is awarded fees. Goofball's appeal and everything is affirmed, except the fee award is sent back for modification. Goofballs then start, individually pro se, though the case involved their corporation, motions to depose various judges, 60 or so other goofy motion, motions to find that the judge is biased and corrupt (why? their reason was because he ruled against their obviously righteous motion). They continue filing motions and lawsuits against everybody in sight, judges, other officials that they had grudges against, etc. Finally, the district court has enough and sanctions them, court of appeals affirms and they file for cert. The USSC, recognizing that there is no reason to further waste resources on goofballs that had been given extensive process, way beyond due process, denies taking it up. This means, of course, that the Constitution is VOID! What are you finding so hard to understand about this, Eddie? Are you one of them thar Illuminatis or something?

So, the constitution is VOID?

 

[Eddie]

So, the constitution is VOID?

No, some people just become inordinately upset at the correct ruling of a lower court. They react by filing voluminous appeals in a sort of legal temper tantrum. When they are ultimately unsuccessful they cry "Conspiracy!"

The technical legal term for it is "butthurt".

 

[SemperFiUSMC]

Since this sounded particularly nutty, I decide to go to Lexis and read the entire procedural history. Mr. Windsor is a whack-job. His son apparently has a company that sells tickets. The Maid of the Mist company that operates the tour boats gave his son's company a credit agreement for on-line sales of ticket vouchers. The price charged by his son's company jacked the price to about 80% higher than walk-in prices at the Maid of the Mist, but gave on-line customers the impression that they were getting a discount and were reserving a time for boarding, neither of which was true. Customers started complaining to MOTM. After some back and forth between the two and attempts by MOTM to compromise, MOTM first asked and then demanded that goofball's company stop selling the vouchers. They, of course, as goofballs are wont to do, refused and started demanding "seven figures" in damages and asserted the right to sell vouchers in perpetuity even though there was no such agreement. MOTM sues to enjoin them and goofballs bring loads of bogus counterclaims. MOTM wins case and is awarded fees. Goofball's appeal and everything is affirmed, except the fee award is sent back for modification. Goofballs then start, individually pro se, though the case involved their corporation, motions to depose various judges, 60 or so other goofy motion, motions to find that the judge is biased and corrupt (why? their reason was because he ruled against their obviously righteous motion). They continue filing motions and lawsuits against everybody in sight, judges, other officials that they had grudges against, etc. Finally, the district court has enough and sanctions them, court of appeals affirms and they file for cert. The USSC, recognizing that there is no reason to further waste resources on goofballs that had been given extensive process, way beyond due process, denies taking it up. This means, of course, that the Constitution is VOID! What are you finding so hard to understand about this, Eddie? Are you one of them thar Illuminatis or something?

Then he is to be worshipped and revered, for he alone stood forth to face down this scandalous government action.

 

[jsharmon7]

Isn't it more fun to make wild claims about the Constitution being void and cover-ups in the Supreme Court? It's certainly more fantastical and attention grabbing than the actual facts of the case.

 

[UncleMike]

Isn't it more fun to make wild claims about the Constitution being void and cover-ups in the Supreme Court? It's certainly more fantastical and attention grabbing than the actual facts of the case.

OR
If someone has stock in Reynolds Aluminum they can make a tidy sum of money from some members here.

 

[public servant]

OR
If someone has stock in Reynolds Aluminum they can make a tidy sum of money from some members here.

Tidy sum my ass. They could hit the mother load.

 

[jsharmon7]

Tidy sum my ass. They could hit the mother load.

Ooooh excellent use of the new smiley. Well played.

 

[CarmelHP]

Tidy sum my ass. They could hit the mother load.

There's about six pathologically nutty posters who give loonyness a whole new dimension around here.

 

[public servant]

There's about six pathologically nutty posters who give loonyness a whole new dimension around here.

 

[Expat]

I love the way crazy unsupported assertions are presented as fact. Did you even read any of the decisions in this case or just swallow this folderol whole?

This is one of them there fancy rhetorical questions, isn't it?

 

[Blackhawk2001]

I really only scanned the page of the web link you posted, but it was hilarious. Thanks for the laugh.

 

[public servant]

I really only scanned the page of the web link you posted, but it was hilarious. Thanks for the laugh.

But you're making fun of black helicopters...aren't you? You non-believer...