Won our independence in caliber not mm.Math is math. Whether you use a fractional system or one that’s base-10, the results are the same in the end. One is just faster and easier to use. Hence why MOA and MRAD both get the exact same job done in the long-range precision world. But because metric is superior, MRAD optics VASTLY outsell MOA and hold their value better. The only place that hasn’t yet been true is with America hunters because they can’t seem to wrap their heads around mils.
We made it to the moon first because we lured all the old Nazi rocket scientists here and put them to work rather than put them on trial. ANYBODY can make it to the moon if they have a) the finances and b) the intelligence. What math you use is totally irrelevant.
So again, played-out. But nice try.
Sounds like laziness!But MOA is more precise than MRAD, especially if you get a 1/8" adjustment turret.
MRAD is preferred, because it's less turns of the turret.
Won our independence in caliber not mm.
Besides....dividing an inch by 16 is much more precise than dividing it by 10.
Significant digits matter!
A centimeter is less than half an inch. 0.3937008" to be precise.The centimeter is closest to an inch
But really, that's the problem. We think in terms of "Well how many inches is that?" That has to be abandoned to convert to the metric system.
A centimeter is less than half an inch. 0.3937008" to be precise.
But really, that's the problem. We think in terms of "Well how many inches is that?" That has to be abandoned to convert to the metric system.
I just turned on the tv.. ...the field is 100 yards..I hope you two are joking lol.
“Caliber” encompasses both metric and standard bore measurements. Strike one.
You can divide an inch by 10 sure, but inches aren’t base-10. You divide a kilometer/meter/centimeter/millimeter by tens. Strike two. The centimeter is closest to an inch, so divide that by ten. Which gives you a millimeter. Which is roughly equivalent to 1/32”. Which is “mOrE pReCiSe” than 1/16”. Strike three, you’re out! Math may be math, but it’s apparently harder for some than others…
I just turned on the tv.. ...the field is 100 yards..
I win
Yes. But considering it's only 238,855 miles to the moon, and 384,400 km. We got there much faster when you consider the shorter distance we had to go.
WUT?I hope you two are joking lol.
“Caliber” encompasses both metric and standard bore measurements. Strike one.
You can divide an inch by 10 sure, but inches aren’t base-10. You divide a kilometer/meter/centimeter/millimeter by tens. Strike two. The centimeter is closest to an inch, so divide that by ten. Which gives you a millimeter. Which is roughly equivalent to 1/32”. Which is “mOrE pReCiSe” than 1/16”. Strike three, you’re out! Math may be math, but it’s apparently harder for some than others…
WUT?
A mil is 36" at 1000 yards, at 100 it is 3.6. divide by 10 clicks and it is .36" per click.
A MOA is 10.4" at 1000 yards, at 100 it is 1". Divide that by 4 for 1/4" turrets and it .25" per click, divide by 8 for 1/8" turrets and it's .125 per click.
MOA is more precise.
MRAD is easier to figure over distance.
therein lies the problemAt 2:30 p.m. a trooper pulled over a Peterbilt Semi, with no trailer, on I-70 eastbound east of Post Road for failing to signal a lane change.