Is this the new general they call "The Butcher of Syria"?New Russian general “flushed the moles from their holes”
So far I have seen no real reports other than telegram Twitter and a few unknown to me euro news reports.
Sounds like the chances of American involvement has just increased greatly.
Go away John Bolton.
National security adviser? Sorry I am uninformed.Go away John Bolton.
Not anymore.National security adviser? Sorry I am uninformed.
Not anymore.
I'm not doubting the existence of the deep state. Just not convinced that John Bolton is part of it anymore. Don't think anyone in the current administration was a fan.They still call shots, it's not called the deep state for nothing.
That sounds to me like some obscure reference to the “secret underground NATO base” they supposedly found.New Russian general “flushed the moles from their holes”
So far I have seen no real reports other than telegram Twitter and a few unknown to me euro news reports.
Sounds like the chances of American involvement has just increased greatly.
Sounds like the same type of story as U.S. General that they "captured"... that was in Africa at the time or some such.That sounds to me like some obscure reference to the “secret underground NATO base” they supposedly found.
You have to be discerning. There are more reliable sources than others, certainly. Twitter is a sewer but that doesn’t mean there is nothing of value to be found there.These "stories" are why I don't trust Twitter or telegram or whatever @Ingomike as a reliable news source. Anybody with a cell phone is suddenly a news breaking journalist. Not saying that some of it isn't true, but it's damned hard to verify.
Yeah, I get it, but who is doing the discerning? If anybody with a smartphone can just sling crap out there, who decides what sticks and what doesn't? And what sources are trustworthy enough to verify the Twitter stuff? Seems like a vicious circle to me.You have to be discerning. There are more reliable sources than others, certainly. Twitter is a sewer but that doesn’t mean there is nothing of value to be found there.
That’s reasonable. It’s kind of like posters on INGO. A few you know from outside INGO and if they’re trustworthy there, they probably are on INGO. Sometimes a new guy comes along who you don’t know. They either build up a reputation of being in the know or they’re just full of hot air. It usually doesn’t take long to figure them out.Yeah, I get it, but who is doing the discerning? If anybody with a smartphone can just sling crap out there, who decides what sticks and what doesn't? And what sources are trustworthy enough to verify the Twitter stuff? Seems like a vicious circle to me.
it sounds like someone deployed a Riot Control Agent....
Not the smartest thing for the Russians to do.. but whatever.
They are still by the letter of the law considered Chemical Weapons, so yes.IIRC, aren't riot control agents like CS gas considered a war crime?