Should he have been armed? With a gun? Who knows? Firearms aren't for everybody. What should he have done was stay in his car, and if need be, run the hooligans over.
That's because it's then called crime!Hate crimes against whites, are about 20% of the total. It just doesn't get a lot of press.
That's because it's then called crime!
I wonder what brand, style and weight the hammers were. Time for the studies to commence. I say ban all hammers over 8oz. no straight claws and no handles over 4 inches.
5, yes 5, teenagers beat him to death with hammers. It could just as easily been 8 and a 5 shot revolver is inadequate (not enough ) to carry and protect yourself with. This type of group violence is becoming more common place and we should carry accordingly, if not, you're just fooling yourself and hoping for the best.
...well...if there were 8 and if the victim was armed with a 5-round revolver, I'm thinking somewhere about the second of 8 attackers hitting the ground the rest would be in full retreat. A 5-round revolver is a much better strategy than nothing and quite possibly may have saved his life and ended a couple of worthless teen criminal lives.
I don't know why the victim left his car. Perhaps he was dragged from his car after a surprise attack - in that case being armed may not have helped, but it certainly wouldn't have hurt. He's dead.