If he was GOP this would be all over the media.
If he was GOP this would be all over the media.
If he was GOP, he would have sent 1000 troops
These troops will be playing a supporting role to the French military, nothing more. Since when did the President need Congressional approval to station a small number of troops in a country that is not an active combat zone?
These troops will be playing a supporting role to the French military, nothing more. Since when did the President need Congressional approval to station a small number of troops in a country that is not an active combat zone?
I heard somewhere the president can send X amount of troops anywhere in the world for 90 days without any congressional approval... again, i HEARD it.. so it's second-hand knowledge.. so take it with a grain of salt...
Some of the people here don't want a single U.S. to step off of the continental U.S. They'll never admit it, but I'm fairly certain, one or two or ten would prefer the soldiers not even be soldiers. We'll just call up the engineers, teachers, and pipefitters the next time we get bombed.Looks like the new troops are just to provide security for the support personnel already on the ground. I guess some of the people here want him to not send security personnel so that if another Benghazi happens they can make political hay again and ask why there weren't more security personnel. Or they don't understand, or care about, the difference between stationing troops and declaring war.
The president can send troops anwhere he wants.
But in a "war" situation, he has 30 days to justify his actions to congress.
They have the decision to declare war, not the pres.
The act you're thinking of is the War Powers Act.