So you have made a judgement call on all OCers, based on what sample size. A dozen videos on youtube, from across the country.
Seems a pretty small sample size to make a judgement call.
Do you do the same stereotyping on gender, race, nationality, etc.?
By the way, if I wanted to intimidate, the gun would be drawn, and I'd mumble to myself.
Or maybe I'd just drink a beer and walk around swinging a baseball bat.
Guns do not generally kill people (at least while being worn). So the fear of a gun in that state might be irrational.
Now take the gun out, and present it in a way that indicates that you are ready to shoot someone, and now we are no longer in the realm of the irrational.
It's not just the gun. It's the presentation.
Well, they are certainly going to get worse if people don't see carriers in postive manners.
And regardless of "perception", that car will kill a lot more people.
To worry about the perceived threat of a gun, while surrounded by 2 ton killing machines.......
How about baseball bats at a game. Baseball bats kill 2X more people than rifles do.
Fearing a car is not at all a similar fear. One kills generally by accident the other related to crimes.
However needless the fear is, it is far more realistic then a parked car..
Questionable analogies aside... People need to be more comfortable with firearms somehow. I don't know the answer.
I do know people are more comfortable with gun free zones creating no ability to protect them selves and yet are in shock when someone is shot in a school, theater, etc.
Feel good laws have created a lot of this gun phobia single handedly.
When a place requires you to disarm before entering they are saying they prohibit the presumed danger associated with bringing it inside.
This false sense of danger is directly transmitted to the public and they in turn feel the same way. In a sense people have "gun free zone" signs on their backs.
Last edited: