Don't buy the party supplies just yet.
Why do you think this will go over any better than any of the other suits, e.g. Montana?
Wait. Is it possible at all for something to be legal under state law, yet illegal under federal law?
This sounds like one part drama, one part comity.
If you understand the sovereignty of the states, it is completely possible for a state law to be at odds with an overreaching, overbearing, tyrannical centrist government.
Interesting.
But, just how would such a federal government enforce such federal laws?
Wait. Is it possible at all for something to be legal under state law, yet illegal under federal law?
This sounds like one part drama, one part comity.
If you understand the sovereignty of the states, it is completely possible for a state law to be at odds with an overreaching, overbearing, tyrannical centrist government.
Interesting.
But, just how would such a federal government enforce such federal laws?
As they`ve done in the past, at places like Waco and Ruby Ridge: with blatant disregard for the Constitution and with overwhelming force.
I guess I should google those. (Congrats on getting to 51 posts, too.)
In the OP, though, the article seems to say they went after him in court, instead of going all Lon Horiuchi on him.
Is that not consistent with the constitution?