Indiana Proposed lead ban in hunting

[Willie]

www.in.gov/nrc/meetings-and-minutes/current-meeting-agenda/

And so, it begins. Note agenda item #7 regarding a ban on lead in hunting. Welcome to California!!!

 

[Cavman]

Dnr loves to make everything more expensive for the hunter. Then say the hunter numbers are down

 

[Rookie]

I've tried lead free ballistic tip on coyotes. The results were interesting, but not impressive. Every coyote required a follow up shot. It seems like the round would go through the skin and explode without much penetration.


This coyote was about 75 yards away, facing me when I shot him in the chest.

 

[Cavman]

I've tried lead free ballistic tip on coyotes. The results were interesting, but not impressive. Every coyote required a follow up shot. It seems like the round would go through the skin and explode without much penetration.

View attachment 298925
This coyote was about 75 yards away, facing me when I shot him in the chest.

Is use lead free for my 300blk for hunting. But ya know they want the lead free to also be any shot youd use in doves, turkey, etc..

 

[Hookeye]

Citizen petition.......wonder how many Blue State immigrants are on that?

 

[two70]

Dnr loves to make everything more expensive for the hunter. Then say the hunter numbers are down

This was instigated by a "petition" from someone whom I have little doubt has an ulterior agenda. The DNR humored it with a study and a webpage. From the linked Document:

"Conclusion The petitioner requested that lead shot be unavailable for purchase in Indiana so that it would not be available for use by hunters. The Indiana DNR cannot prohibit the sale of lead shot in Indiana because it is outside the authority of the DNR, and individuals may use that ammunition for target practice, as well as in other states. Secondly, prohibiting the sale of lead shot would likely impact retailers that sell lead shot to hunters by reducing their sales when non-lead options are not readily available or are more costly. As we continue to manage fish, wildlife, and their habitat, the Indiana DNR believes it is important to acknowledge the effect of lead on the environment statewide. To achieve this, the DNR has developed a new website with information about the effects of lead and will share educational materials with the public to discuss the environmental benefits of using non-lead equipment when hunting and fishing. These materials will allow individuals to see how their actions can impact the environment, whether through picking up lead litter or using non-lead ammunition and tackle. Through these educational efforts, DNR will help ensure that outdoor recreation will sustain for generations to come."

It seems to me that the DNR did a relatively decent job of cutting this BS off at the knees. I'd have preferred that they not waste time or effort on this nonsense but it may well be the case where a ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.

 

[Michigan Slim]

If they ever ban it I'll make my own.

 

[loudgroove]

This is why we should help people in other states dealing with this crap. Because it ends you trying to show its head here.

 

[Hookeye]

Sounds like the petitioner needs an ounce of rock salt in the britches.
Hey, it aint lead LMAO

 

[Cavman]

This was instigated by a "petition" from someone whom I have little doubt has an ulterior agenda. The DNR humored it with a study and a webpage. From the linked Document:

"Conclusion The petitioner requested that lead shot be unavailable for purchase in Indiana so that it would not be available for use by hunters. The Indiana DNR cannot prohibit the sale of lead shot in Indiana because it is outside the authority of the DNR, and individuals may use that ammunition for target practice, as well as in other states. Secondly, prohibiting the sale of lead shot would likely impact retailers that sell lead shot to hunters by reducing their sales when non-lead options are not readily available or are more costly. As we continue to manage fish, wildlife, and their habitat, the Indiana DNR believes it is important to acknowledge the effect of lead on the environment statewide. To achieve this, the DNR has developed a new website with information about the effects of lead and will share educational materials with the public to discuss the environmental benefits of using non-lead equipment when hunting and fishing. These materials will allow individuals to see how their actions can impact the environment, whether through picking up lead litter or using non-lead ammunition and tackle. Through these educational efforts, DNR will help ensure that outdoor recreation will sustain for generations to come."

It seems to me that the DNR did a relatively decent job of cutting this BS off at the knees. I'd have preferred that they not waste time or effort on this nonsense but it may well be the case where a ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.

Thanks for that. Where was that on website?

 

[Zexrain]

www.in.gov/nrc/meetings-and-minutes/current-meeting-agenda/

And so, it begins. Note agenda item #7 regarding a ban on lead in hunting. Welcome to California!!!

By the way I see you. This is Chasingtails from the other fourms.

That would really stink if they made that rule up. Says citizens petition so I'm guessing they are trying to please someone by atleast throwing the idea out there and not taking it seriously.

 

[two70]

Thanks for that. Where was that on website?

It was from a PDF linked to the supporting materials link under #7.

 

[JTKelly]

Do they know WHERE lead comes from?

 

[Cavman]

It was from a PDF linked to the supporting materials link under #7.

Got ya thank you

 

[Leadeye]

Brought to you from the same people that think raccoons are starship pilots.

 

[cerebus85]

This has a long way to go before it makes it to legislation. I foresee it being alot of talk first. I can also see it being used on managed land first before it becomes the thing. We also need to acknowledge that SJC are spreading and many social media hunting personalities have been preaching about it. So, suffice to say that when people hear them they think all of us. Do I think this will pass? No, I don't. Do I think that we need to do a better job of getting the regular guy's voice out there. Most definitely.

 

[yetti462]

The crap has been used for 100's of years, is really a problem?

I think not.

 

[BiscuitsandGravy]

Citizen petition.......wonder how many Blue State immigrants are on that?

Look at the supporting material attachment. Google may help.

 

[phylodog]

It seems to me that the DNR did a relatively decent job of cutting this BS off at the knees. I'd have preferred that they not waste time or effort on this nonsense but it may well be the case where a ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.

I think you're spot on. Considering the type who would make this sort of a petition, ignoring them never goes well. They just squeal louder and more childishly.

 

[Onebad06vtx]

It says lead shot,not lead bullets.