There are plenty of cases to show that standing trees make poor backstops.
I've hung targets on mature, live trees and never had a .308 blow out the backside, let alone through thousands of trees.
There are plenty of cases to show that standing trees make poor backstops.
When is the vote/final decision to be made on this?
From what I was told we the public will know something by March or April of 2015 ???
Do states that already allow HP rifles have higher levels of hunters getting shot by others?
I don't want any chance some idiot will be out there with something underpowered that is legal wounding deer.
I've hung targets on mature, live trees and never had a .308 blow out the backside, let alone through thousands of trees.
A stand of trees is not a solid backstop. There are plenty of examples of cases where people fired into a stand of trees, and the bullet traversed an impressive distance without hitting a tree before hitting someone. An example in the Zionsville area a number of years ago where a 45ACP went approximately 200 yards through a forest before going through the side of a house and killing someone comes to mind. After the fact, they found a lot of marks on trees where said person had test-fired rounds into the woods and they had hit trees but one eventually made it through and killed someone.
Anyone who relies on a stand of trees to stop a bullet is a complete idiot. If this offends you I am not sorry.
I looked up the incident...............article says .45 caliber.
Never says what cartridge/platform though.
Wonder if it .454 Casull.
Using the statistical exception to prove your point is faulty methodology.
A stand If this offends you I am not sorry.