I know none of you are lawyers, and most likely none of you are BATF employees, but I am still interested in this question which is theoretical at this point (and I mean that).
So owning an AR rifle, or several, and buying a .223 upper with a short barrel is a no-no as that would be "constructive intent" to make an SBR. I understand that.
But what about adding a 9mm short upper if you do not have a 9mm BCG? I.E. you have the upper, barrel complete but not enough parts to make a functional weapon since your .223 parts cannot complete a 9mm.
Yes, this is getting up against the wall, but would it really be on the wall or over it?
Why do I ask? Because I see the occasional deal on a 9mm upper and would like to make a good price buy even if I have not gotten a form 1 started an of my AR lowers.
So owning an AR rifle, or several, and buying a .223 upper with a short barrel is a no-no as that would be "constructive intent" to make an SBR. I understand that.
But what about adding a 9mm short upper if you do not have a 9mm BCG? I.E. you have the upper, barrel complete but not enough parts to make a functional weapon since your .223 parts cannot complete a 9mm.
Yes, this is getting up against the wall, but would it really be on the wall or over it?
Why do I ask? Because I see the occasional deal on a 9mm upper and would like to make a good price buy even if I have not gotten a form 1 started an of my AR lowers.