Combat Firearms "Report Card" from Afghanistan

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • IndyGunner

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Dec 27, 2010
    1,977
    36
    None of this was written by me or is my opinion. Just figured id share.

    This is an interesting, honest, eye-opening and comforting report card of Afghanistan from someone who's there. Well worth the read time.

    This is an email is from a Marine who's in Afghanistan; his buddy Jordan provides many of the details. No politics here; just a Marine with a bird's eye view opinion of the issues and problems facing today's Marine in combat. :patriot:

    US Weapons:

    1) The M-16 rifle: Thumbs down. Chronic jamming problems with the talcum powder like sand over there. The sand is everywhere. Jordan says you feel filthy 2 minutes after coming out of the shower. The M-4 carbine version is more popular because it's lighter and shorter, but it has jamming problems also. They have the ability to mount the various optical gun sights and weapons lights on the picatinny rails, but the weapon itself is not great in a desert environment.

    EVERYONE hates the 5.56mm (.223) round. Poor penetration on the cinder block structure common over there and even torso hits can't be reliably counted on to put the enemy down.

    Fun fact:

    1) Random autopsies on dead insurgents show a high level of opiate use.

    2) The M243 SAW (squad assault weapon): .223 cal. Drum fed light machine gun. Big thumbs down.. Universally considered a piece of ****. Chronic jamming problems, most of which require partial dis-assembly (that's fun in the middle of a firefight).

    3) The M9 Beretta 9mm Pistol: Mixed bag. Good gun performs well in desert environment; but they all hate the 9mm cartridge. The use of handguns for self-defense is actually fairly common. Same old story on the 9mm: Bad guys hit multiple times and still in the fight.

    4) Mossberg 12ga. Military shotgun: Works well, used frequently for clearing houses to good effect. (Great weapon - I used these when transporting prisoners.)

    5) The M240 Machine Gun: 7.62 NATO (.308) cal. belt fed machine gun, developed to replace the old M-60 (what a beautiful weapon that was!!) Thumbs up. Accurate, reliable, and the 7.62 round puts 'em down. Originally developed as a vehicle mounted weapon, more and more are being dismounted and taken into the field by infantry. The 7.62 round chews up the structure over there (and actually kills the enemy).

    6) The M2 50 cal heavy machine gun: Thumbs way, way up. "Ma Deuce" is still worth her considerable weight in gold. The ultimate fight stopper - puts their dicks in the dirt every time. The most coveted weapon in-theater.

    7) The .45 pistol (M1911A1): Thumbs up. Still the best pistol around out there. Everybody authorized to carry a sidearm is trying to get their hands on one. With few exceptions, one can reliably be expected to put 'em down with a torso hit. The special ops guys (who are doing most of the pistol work) use the HK military model and supposedly love it (H&K USP .45). The old government model.45's are being re-issued en masse (We can't get enough fast enough).

    8) The M-14: Thumbs up. They are being re-issued in bulk, mostly in a modified version to special ops guys (M-14 EBR). Modifications include lightweight Kevlar stocks and low power red dot or ACOG sights. Very reliable in the sandy environment, and they love the 7.62 round. It kills the enemy no problem.

    9) The Barrett .50 cal sniper rifle: Thumbs way up. Spectacular range and accuracy and hits like a freight train. Used frequently to take out vehicle suicide bombers (we actually stop a lot of them) and barricaded enemy. It is definitely here to stay.

    10) The M24 sniper rifle: Thumbs up. Mostly in .308 but some in 300 Win Mag. Heavily modified Remington 700's. Great performance. Snipers have been used heavily to great effect. Rumor has it a marine sniper on his third tour in Anbar province has actually exceeded Carlos Hathcock's record for confirmed kills with OVER 100. (No **** real.)

    11) The new body armor: Thumbs up. Relatively light at approx. 6 lbs. and can reliably be expected to soak up small shrapnel and even will stop an AK-47 round.

    The bad news: Hot as **** to wear, almost unbearable in the summer heat(which averages over 120 degrees). Also, the enemy now goes for head shots whenever possible. All the bull**** about the "old" body armor making our guys vulnerable to the IED's was a non-starter. The IED explosions are enormous and body armor doesn't make any difference at all in most cases (Nothing short of an Abrams M1 Tank will protect personnel against most IEDs, and sometimes not even them.).

    12) Night Vision and Infrared Equipment: Thumbs way up. Spectacular performance. Our guys see in the dark and own the night, period. Very little enemy action after evening prayers. More and more enemy being whacked at night during movement by our hunter-killer teams. We've all seen the videos.

    13) Lights: Thumbs up. Most of the weapon mounted and personal lights are Surefire's, and the troops love 'em. Invaluable for night urban operations. Jordan carried a $34 Surefire G2 on a neck lanyard and loved it. I can't help but notice that most of the good fighting weapons and ordnance are 50 or more years old!! With all our technology, it's the WWII and Vietnam era weapons that everybody wants!! The infantry fighting is frequent, up close and brutal. No quarter is given or shown.

    Bad guy weapons:

    1) Mostly AK47's. The entire country is an arsenal. Works better in the desert than the M16 and the .308 Russian round kills reliably. PKM belt fed light machine guns are also common and effective. Luckily, the enemy mostly shoots like ****. Undisciplined "spray and pray" type fire. However, they are seeing more and more precision weapons, especially sniper rifles. ( From Iran, again.)

    2) The RPG: Probably the infantry weapon most feared by our guys. Simple, reliable and as common as dog****. The enemy responded to our up-armored Humvees by aiming at the windshields, often at point blank range. Still killing a lot of our guys.

    3) The IED: The biggest killer of all. Can be anything from old Soviet anti-armor mines to jury rigged artillery shells. A lot found in Jordan 's area were in abandoned cars. The enemy would take 2 or 3 155 mm artillery shells and wire them together. Most were detonated by cell phone and the explosions are enormous. You're not safe in any vehicle, even an M1 tank. Driving is by far the most dangerous thing our guys do over there. Lately, they are much more sophisticated "shape charges" (Iranian) specifically designed to penetrate armor.

    Fact: Most of the ready made IED's are supplied by Iran , who is also providing terrorists (Hezbollah types) to train the insurgents in their use and tactics. That's why the attacks have been so deadly lately. Their concealment methods are ingenious, the latest being shape charges, in Styrofoam containers spray painted to look like the cinder blocks that litter all Iraqi roads. We find about 40% before they detonate, and the bomb disposal guys are the unsung heroes of this war.

    4) Mortars and rockets: Very prevalent. The Soviet era 122mm rockets (with an 18km range) are becoming more prevalent. One of Jordan 's NCO's lost a leg to one. These weapons cause a lot of damage "inside the wire". Jordan 's base was hit almost daily his entire time there by mortar and rocket fire, often at night to disrupt sleep patterns and cause fatigue (It did). More of a psychological weapon than anything else. The enemy mortar teams would jump out of vehicles, fire a few rounds, and then haul ass in a matter of seconds.

    Fun fact: Captured enemy have apparently marveled at the marksmanship of our guys and how hard they fight. They are apparently told in Jihad school that the Americans rely solely on technology, and can be easily beaten in close quarters combat for their lack of toughness. Let's just say they know better now. [God bless the Marine Corps.]

    Bad guy technology: Simple yet effective. Most communication is by cell and satellite phones and also by email on laptops. They use handheld GPS units for navigation and "Google Earth" for overhead views of our positions. Their weapons are good, if not fancy, and prevalent. Their explosives and bomb technology is TOP OF THE LINE. Night vision is rare. They are very careless with their equipment and the GPS units and laptops are treasure troves of Intel when captured.

    Who are the bad guys? These are mostly "foreigners", non-Afghan Arab Jihadists from all over the Muslim world (and Europe). Some are virtually untrained young Jihadists that often end up as suicide bombers or in various "sacrifice squads". Most, however, are hard core terrorists from all the usual suspects (Al Qaeda, Hezbollah, Hamas etc.). These are the guys running around murdering civilians en masse and cutting heads off.

    The Chechens (many of whom are Caucasian) are supposedly the most ruthless and the best fighters. They have been fighting the Russians for years. The terrorists have been very adept at infiltrating the Afghan local govt.'s, the police forces and the Army. They have had a spy and agitator network there since the Iran-Iraq war in the early 80's.

    Bad Guy Tactics: When they are engaged on an infantry level they get their asses kicked every time! Brave, but stupid. Suicidal Banzai-type charges were very common earlier in the war and still occur. They will literally sacrifice 8-10 man teams in suicide squads by sending them screaming and firing AK's and RPG's directly at our bases just to probe the defenses. They get mowed down like grass every time (see the M2 and M240 above). Jordan 's base was hit like this often. When engaged, they have a tendency to flee to the same building, probably for what they think will be a glorious last stand. Instead, we call in air and that's the end of that more often than not. These hole-ups are referred to as Alpha Whiskey Romeo's (AWR: Allah's Waiting Room).

    We have the laser guided ground-air thing down to a science. The fast movers, mostly Marine F-18's, are taking an ever increasing toll on the enemy. When caught out in the open, the helicopter gunships and AC-130 Spectre Gunships cut them to ribbons with cannon and rocket fire, especially at night. Interestingly, artillery is hardly used at all.

    Fun facts: The enemy death toll is supposedly between 45-50 thousand. That is why we're seeing less and less infantry attacks and more IED, suicide bomber ****. The new strategy is just simple attrition. The insurgent tactic most frustrating is their use of civilian non-combatants as cover. They know we do all we can to avoid civilian casualties and therefore schools, hospitals and especially Mosques are locations where they meet, stage for attacks, cache weapons, and ammo and flee to when engaged. They have absolutely no regard whatsoever for inflicting civilian casualties. [Women and civilian men are all considered expendable to Allah] They will terrorize locals and murder without hesitation anyone believed to be sympathetic to the Americans. Kidnaping of family members, especially children, is common to influence people they are trying to influence but can't reach, such as local govt. officials, clerics, tribal leaders, etc.. The first thing our guys are told is "don't get captured". They know that if captured they will be tortured and beheaded on the internet. They openly offer bounties for anyone who brings in a live American serviceman. This motivates the criminal element who otherwise don't give a **** about the war. A lot of the beheading victims were actually kidnaped by common criminals and sold to them. As such, for our guys, every fight is to the death. Surrender is not an option. The Afghani's are a mixed bag. Some fight well; others aren't worth a damn. Most do okay with American support.

    Finding leaders is hard, but they are getting better. Many Afghani's were galvanized and the caliber of recruits in the Army and the police forces went right up, along with their motivation. It also led to an exponential increase in good intel because the Afghani's are sick of the insurgent attacks against civilians.

    Morale: According to Jordan , morale among our guys is very high. They not only believe that they are winning, but that they are winning decisively. They are stunned and dismayed by what they see in the American press, whom they almost universally view as against them. The embedded reporters are despised and distrusted. They are inflicting casualties at a rate of 20-1 and then see **** like "Are we losing in Iraq " on TV and the print media. For the most part, they are satisfied with their equipment, food, and leadership. Bottom line though, and they all say this, is that there are not enough guys there to drive the final stake through the heart of the insurgency, primarily because there aren't enough troops in-theater to shut down the borders with Afghanisan and Pakistan. The Iranians and the Syrians just can't stand the thought of Afganistan being an American ally (with, of course, permanent US bases there).

    Anyway, that's it, hope you found it interesting.
     
    Last edited:

    Gamez235

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    16   0   0
    Mar 24, 2009
    3,598
    48
    Upstate
    2) The M243 SAW (squad assault weapon): .223 cal. Drum fed light machine gun.


    I think what he meant to say was;

    Squad Automatic Weapon in 5.56 and it's belt fed. All cred was lost there. Good read though while muching on my light lunch today though.
     

    IndyGunner

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Dec 27, 2010
    1,977
    36
    None of this was written by me or is my opinion. Just figured id share.

    his buddy Jordan provides many of the details

    Im not sure what influence this has on the information given.
     

    iChokePeople

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    51   0   1
    Feb 11, 2011
    4,556
    48
    Actually, it's the M249 SAW, and fires from either a belt OR a standard magazine. But I can see how they'd say drum, based on the way the linked stuff is packaged and generally attached and used.

    ETA: should have added, my experience with the SAW was back in the late 1980s, might be different now. And wow -- has it really been 25 years? I'm old. How did that happen?
     

    adam

    Sharpshooter
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    47   0   0
    Apr 20, 2011
    712
    28
    Noblesville
    2) The M243 SAW (squad assault weapon):......

    ^It's a M249. I carried one in Afghanistan, and loved it. Never had an issue with it.

    11) The new body armor:...

    Whatever armor they are wearing weighs much more than 6lbs. The plates alone are 20lbs.

    This has been hovering around the internet for awhile.
     

    1911 mike

    Marksman
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    May 13, 2009
    243
    18
    3rd rock from the sun
    In the report I hope those that took the time to read it saw that they were not happy with the 9mm rounds. And wanted the 45. Saying it take several 9mm rounds to put them down!! And the 45's were being brought back into service as fast as they can get them up and running.. I hope those that pack the 9mm will see and understand it would be of your best interest to start looking for a 45.. I used my Remington Rand in Vietnam to dispatch 2 Viet Cong soldiers. Each took the 45 rounds and down they went!! And (DID NOT) get back up!! Make mine 45 and THANKS John M. Browning
     

    brutalone

    Shooter
    Rating - 100%
    20   0   0
    Apr 24, 2011
    401
    16
    Westside Indianapolis
    In the report I hope those that took the time to read it saw that they were not happy with the 9mm rounds. And wanted the 45. Saying it take several 9mm rounds to put them down!! And the 45's were being brought back into service as fast as they can get them up and running.. I hope those that pack the 9mm will see and understand it would be of your best interest to start looking for a 45.. I used my Remington Rand in Vietnam to dispatch 2 Viet Cong soldiers. Each took the 45 rounds and down they went!! And (DID NOT) get back up!! Make mine 45 and THANKS John M. Browning
    I don't run hardball in my 9mm.....
    but if I had to... I would carry a 45.....
    and forget all the BS you see in the movies.... Those who have truly confided in me about being on the ground, in the "bush" in Vietnam..... Experienced man on point (not some cherry like you see in Platoon) and they carried an 870 and 2 1911s....
     
    Last edited:

    CountryBoy19

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 91.7%
    11   1   0
    Nov 10, 2008
    8,412
    63
    Bedford, IN
    2) The M243 SAW (squad assault weapon):......

    ^It's a M249. I carried one in Afghanistan, and loved it. Never had an issue with it.

    11) The new body armor:...

    Whatever armor they are wearing weighs much more than 6lbs. The plates alone are 20lbs.

    This has been hovering around the internet for awhile.
    I've seen some of the new body armor, you must not have seen it if you say the plates alone are 20 lbs.


    BTW, where is the 134 in that list? They call that a "game changer" over there and it didn't even make the list?

    Most teams prefer the 134 over the M2 from my experiences.
     

    adam

    Sharpshooter
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    47   0   0
    Apr 20, 2011
    712
    28
    Noblesville
    I've seen some of the new body armor, you must not have seen it if you say the plates alone are 20 lbs.


    BTW, where is the 134 in that list? They call that a "game changer" over there and it didn't even make the list?

    Most teams prefer the 134 over the M2 from my experiences.

    Front/back and the two side plates are around 15 pounds or more. That is the ESAPI plates. Some people didn't wear the side plates.
     

    the1kidd03

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Jul 19, 2011
    6,717
    48
    somewhere
    entire "report card" is BS.....NO Marine I ever served with ESPECIALLY those with combat oriented MOS's would make any of the numerous errors in this writing
     

    the1kidd03

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Jul 19, 2011
    6,717
    48
    somewhere
    wow....after going back through and reading the rest of it....it actually repulses me to think that someone would pass this off as though a grunt would have written it....there's at least 2 mistakes on every line/article/section
     

    the1kidd03

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Jul 19, 2011
    6,717
    48
    somewhere
    In the report I hope those that took the time to read it saw that they were not happy with the 9mm rounds. And wanted the 45. Saying it take several 9mm rounds to put them down!! And the 45's were being brought back into service as fast as they can get them up and running.. I hope those that pack the 9mm will see and understand it would be of your best interest to start looking for a 45.. I used my Remington Rand in Vietnam to dispatch 2 Viet Cong soldiers. Each took the 45 rounds and down they went!! And (DID NOT) get back up!! Make mine 45 and THANKS John M. Browning

    We can cite resources from hundreds of ballistics experts all day with equivalent evidence on both sides of the fence that 9mm is just as effective as 45....blows down to choice of ammunition and whether or not you're able to disrupt the CNS....additionally, the military has not brought the 45 back or fielding them currently in any sort of wide spread fashion.....I can tell you even spec-ops still gets issued the beretta and very few/select units are allowed to "choose" their weapons (i.e. SEALs, MARSOC, Army special forces).....although I do love 1911's for personal collection, I equally love the beretta and have put many, many rounds through it as well
     

    jayhawk

    Expert
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    Jul 16, 2009
    1,194
    48
    Fort Wayne, IN
    In the report I hope those that took the time to read it saw that they were not happy with the 9mm rounds. And wanted the 45. Saying it take several 9mm rounds to put them down!! And the 45's were being brought back into service as fast as they can get them up and running.. I hope those that pack the 9mm will see and understand it would be of your best interest to start looking for a 45.. I used my Remington Rand in Vietnam to dispatch 2 Viet Cong soldiers. Each took the 45 rounds and down they went!! And (DID NOT) get back up!! Make mine 45 and THANKS John M. Browning

    It's fake.
     

    the1kidd03

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Jul 19, 2011
    6,717
    48
    somewhere
    I've seen some of the new body armor, you must not have seen it if you say the plates alone are 20 lbs.


    BTW, where is the 134 in that list? They call that a "game changer" over there and it didn't even make the list?

    Most teams prefer the 134 over the M2 from my experiences.

    the m134 is primarily used as a aircraft mounted weapon...not many, if any mounted on ground vehicles and ones that are, are generally by specialized units....they simply aren't wide spread or widely used...by ground units anyway....and I've never know a single machine gunner (at least in the Corps) prefer ANYTHING over the deuce...me either for that matter...it's got far better range than the 134 not to mention penetration.....it has an unmistakeable sound which is like music to the ears of a grunt....when it starts rockin, people start running...or dying
     

    CountryBoy19

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 91.7%
    11   1   0
    Nov 10, 2008
    8,412
    63
    Bedford, IN
    the m134 is primarily used as a aircraft mounted weapon...not many, if any mounted on ground vehicles and ones that are, are generally by specialized units....they simply aren't wide spread or widely used...by ground units anyway....and I've never know a single machine gunner (at least in the Corps) prefer ANYTHING over the deuce...me either for that matter...it's got far better range than the 134 not to mention penetration.....it has an unmistakeable sound which is like music to the ears of a grunt....when it starts rockin, people start running...or dying
    Maybe your experience with the corps is different but from my experiences they (the soldiers and ex-soldiers I deal with daily) do, in fact, prefer the 134 over Ma Deuce in most cases. The only time they don't like the 134 is if it's out of time and not functioning properly.
     
    Top Bottom