CNN trying to cover up their embarassment...

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • SavageEagle

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Apr 27, 2008
    19,568
    38
    MEDIA MATTERS
    [FONT=Palatino, Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif][SIZE=+2]Scrubbed! CNN yanking tea party 'embarrassment'[/SIZE][/FONT]
    [FONT=Palatino, Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif][SIZE=+1]Demands YouTube remove video of fed-up citizens berating reporter[/SIZE][/FONT]

    [SIZE=-1]Posted: April 19, 2009
    7:40 pm Eastern

    [/SIZE]

    [FONT=Palatino, Times New Roman, Georgia, Times, serif]By Drew Zahn[/FONT]
    [SIZE=-1]© 2009 WorldNetDaily [/SIZE]
    090419foundingbloggers1.jpg

    Screenshot of CNN's copyright claim status on YouTube video
    Cable television news [COLOR=blue! important][COLOR=blue! important]network[/COLOR][/COLOR] CNN has attempted to block a video on YouTube.com that shows "tea party" protesters in Chicago confronting the network's reporter Susan Roesgen over her allegedly biased and "not fair" coverage of the event.
    Members of Founding Bloggers.com were on hand to videotape the crowd's response to Roesgen's report, in which she badgered protesters on air, summarizing her report by describing the tea party as "anti-government, anti-CNN, since this is highly promoted by the right-wing, conservative network Fox."
    Roesgen's report included arguments with the tea partiers, tossing out contrary positions and demanding her subjects justify their positions, as well as an antagonistic interview with a protester whose sign read, "Obama is a fascist."
    "That's not representative of most of the people out here," charged an unidentified woman after the CNN cameras were turned off. Confronting Roesgen, she added, "You are not talking to regular, mainstream people; you picked people to talk to. … We've watched what you've been doing here, and it's not fair."
    The man Roesgen had been interviewing right before CNN's coverage stopped was also captured by the Founding Bloggers camera, saying, "We don't have any respect for CNN, because it doesn't respect us."
    When the blog posted the video on YouTube – showing a portion of Roesgen's report, followed by its own footage – however, the clip was scrubbed and replaced with the message, "This video is no longer available due to a copyright claim by Cable [COLOR=blue! important][COLOR=blue! important]News [COLOR=blue! important]Network[/COLOR][/COLOR][/COLOR], Inc."
    Want to know how to fight back against grossly biased news coverage? Get "Media Revolution: A Battle Plan to Defeat Mass Deception in America."
    Founding Bloggers contends its use of the CNN footage in its video falls under fair use guidelines, and it re-posted the film, which can be seen below – or, should it be removed from YouTube again, can be viewed at the website of KXMB-TV in Bismarck, N.D.
    Editor's note: The following video includes an instance of strong profanity.

    (Story continues below)



    News of CNN squelching the video in a copyright claim, despite the majority of the video consisting of original Founding Bloggers material, quickly spread through the blogosphere.
    "It is hard to avoid the inference that in this case," writes John H. Hinderaker of the Power Line blog. "CNN was motivated not by a desire to protect its intellectual property but by a desire to avoid embarrassment caused by the unprofessional performance of its reporter."
    "Obviously we hit a nerve with CNN because they forced YouTube to pull the video down, along with all of the comments people posted," Founding Bloggers responded. "We are in the process of consulting our Founding Bloggers legal team to decide if we are going to file a counter claim against CNN. We believe that we are well within our rights under fair use, but we are not [COLOR=blue! important][COLOR=blue! important]attorneys[/COLOR][/COLOR] so….we'll see."
    Ben Sheffner of the blog Copyrights and Campaigns, however, is an attorney who has served as a copyright advisor to NBC Universal, Fox and the John McCain campaign.
    "CNN does own copyright in its own news footage and, as a general matter, has the right to demand its removal from YouTube," Sheffner writes on his blog. "However, as to this particular video, I think Founding Bloggers has a very strong fair use defense. The purpose for Founding Bloggers' posting of the CNN footage is crystal clear: to comment on and criticize CNN's reporting on the 'Tea Party.' Such a use is right in the heartland of the fair use doctrine; the statute specifically mentions 'criticism, comment, [and] news reporting' as protected uses that are 'not an infringement of copyright.'"
    Sheffner adds, "Many fair use cases are difficult, close calls – but, given the facts as I know them, this is an easy one. … I'm surprised CNN made this claim in the first place."
    WND attempted to contact CNN for comment, but no one was available to speak during weekend hours.
     

    HandK

    Grandmaster
    Emeritus
    Rating - 100%
    11   0   0
    Mar 14, 2009
    51,606
    38
    Way Up North!!
    Great post! CNN needs to see that the people feel they no longer have a voice in the way this country is run. I remember the good old days when you had served this country (armed Sevice's) then you got elected to office, they had integrity, duty to country, respect of life and limb. those that are elected today just have a past!!!. :patriot:
     

    Plague421

    Expert
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 21, 2009
    850
    18
    Portage
    Since the video you have posted has been removed I say we need to find a new video hosting site. YouTube has been getting more and more ridiculous with the censorship.
     

    citizenvain

    Marksman
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Apr 1, 2009
    154
    16
    Indianapolis
    Personally, I do not think any news or press should be allowed to "copyright" their material. They have WAY TOO MUCH POWER when they are allowed to own the information they spew. Think about it, they can report and grab any information they want "freedom of the press" and own it? Even information about you and your family. Too much power, the news should not be able to own information.
     

    SavageEagle

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Apr 27, 2008
    19,568
    38
    Since the video you have posted has been removed I say we need to find a new video hosting site. YouTube has been getting more and more ridiculous with the censorship.

    Well I don't blame them. Lawsuits are expensive. Someone needs to have the balls to have an open site for ages 18 and older with no restrictions, no censorship. If you upload copyrighted material, you run the risk of the lawsuit, not the site owns. :twocents:

    As for the media owning copyrights, I think you're right. To some extent. They should be able to copyright their OPINIONS or IDEAS that they come up with, but not informative facts they report on. Another :twocents:.
     

    Plague421

    Expert
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 21, 2009
    850
    18
    Portage
    Well I don't blame them. Lawsuits are expensive. Someone needs to have the balls to have an open site for ages 18 and older with no restrictions, no censorship. If you upload copyrighted material, you run the risk of the lawsuit, not the site owns. :twocents:

    As for the media owning copyrights, I think you're right. To some extent. They should be able to copyright their OPINIONS or IDEAS that they come up with, but not informative facts they report on. Another :twocents:.

    I think the problem here was that CNN chose to have that particular news article taken off. However hundreds of other CNN videos remain on YouTube without concern. Take it all or not at all. I guess it is within your rights as a copyright holder but it says plenty about the station because it wants just the ONE article taken off because it can damage their image.

    Personally I think that reporter should be fired, or at least reprimanded for NOT doing her job. As a reporter you are there to report why the people are there, not argue with them why they are there.

    This is a prime example of why I don't watch the news anymore. If I wanted opinions, not facts, I would go read a political blog, which more than likely has a much more educated opinion than any of the news networks can ever hope to have.

    You can view the video here the website of KXMB-TV in Bismarck, N.D.
    it is also noted in the body of the post, hope this helps.;)

    Once it is on the internet it will ALWAYS be on the internet. I already saw the video I was just expressing my disgust with YouTube for removing it.
     

    Joe Williams

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 26, 2008
    10,431
    38
    What a stupid move on the part of CNN. Just as the noise about their dipshit reporter was almost completely dead, they stir it up again and give it another week of life.
     
    Top Bottom