California in effect just killed USPSA in that State

[racegunz]

So an absolute normal capacity magazine ban,( maybe only rifles?) no grandfather clause! WOW! Brown Signs Six Gun Control Bills, Vetoes Five - capradio.org
not that I was going to Cali. I can see the handwriting on the wall even if it is only rifles

 

[Rusty Shackleford]

Wow am I reading this right, background checks for ammo sales? I bet that is going to stop the bad guys from getting their hands on ammo, just like it did for their guns.

 

[rugertoter]

Talk about gone to hell in a hand basket. What a sad state of affairs out west.

 

[Fuzz]

Yeah well if the Witch gets elected you can bet she will model the nations guns laws after Cali. If not Australia.........

 

[SSGSAD]

Well, let me show my "prejudice" .....

NOT to knock LEO,

BUT, Ret. LEO, exempt from mag., restrictions,

BUT, NO MENTION, of Ret., MILITARY .....



COLOR ME SURPRISED !!!!!

 

[Bosshoss]

Only limited and open shooters are screwed.
Limited 10, SS, Prod, and Revo still OK unless some fine print says otherwise. Looks like Open 10 will be the new hotness.

I loved that state when we rode through it on motorcycles but hated the politics an government BS that one had to deal with to live there.
I feel sorry for those that have to be there for jobs, family, etc.

 

[sporter]

Don't worry....I have been assured the Democrats don't want to take our guns!!

 

[racegunz]

Don't worry....I have been assured the Democrats don't want to take our guns!!

For sure just the mags and ammo

 

[snorko]

Couple blog posts are saying the expanded definition of "assault weapon" will then include ANY firearm that uses a detachable magazine., eff. 2019

 

[indykid]

So in commiefornia, if you own a standard capacity AK mag (30 round) or standard capacity Beretta 92 mag (15 or 17 round) with no grandfather clause, and you don't turn in your suddenly now illegal mags, are you an instant felon, and if so, what does the law matter? And if you take it further... not going there.

 

[bulletsmith]

**** California. That is all.

 

[rhino]

There will soon be a lot of newly felonized felons in California.

 

[Grelber]

Couple blog posts are saying the expanded definition of "assault weapon" will then include ANY firearm that uses a detachable magazine., eff. 2019

Bullet button ban (SB 880/AB 1135): California already bans the sale of rifles that have detachable magazines—where pushing a button with a finger can dislodge the weapon’s magazine. Gun manufacturers have instead added “bullet buttons,” which still allow the magazine to slide out, but require the tip of a bullet or another pointed object to access it. The bill includes weapons with “bullet buttons” in the detachable magazine ban. SIGNED BOTH.

Seems like the near future for handguns. If they leave revolver reloading alone they could become the 'high capacity assault weapon' , probably will outlaw the moon clips.

 

[actaeon277]

This is why we say, NO MORE.

Stop "compromising".

 

[Slawburger]

Introducing USPSA's newest division...
Blackpowder Optics

 

[spec4]

At some point the whacko pols out there will run out of new gun laws. Of course their real goal is a total ban and confiscation. What's in the air out there?

 

[Vic_Mackey]

Man, this is absolutely ridiculous. How does a state that large have these kind of election issues? Surely the rest of that state isn't as daft as San Francisco or LA.....

 

[Hkindiana]

I don't see any wording about the "grandfathered" hi cap mags that the sheepies have already registered as being exempt from the NEW magazine ban. So, they dutifully registered their mags, and NOW they have to get rid of them. The police have lists of all the registered hi cap mags and who owns them. Of course they have NO IDEA of what the criminals have.

 

[Vic_Mackey]

It would seem quite a few Americans may be getting a lesson in registration leading to confiscation. Maybe that will be the wake up call.

 

[IndyDave1776]

Well, let me show my "prejudice" .....

NOT to knock LEO,

BUT, Ret. LEO, exempt from mag., restrictions,

BUT, NO MENTION, of Ret., MILITARY .....



COLOR ME SURPRISED !!!!!

I would have a problem not only with retired LEO but presently serving LEO being exempted. This may draw some static from some folks, but establishing two different sets of laws is how you convert public servants to public masters.