AWB: Which enumerated power?

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • SirRealism

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Nov 17, 2008
    1,779
    38
    Can someone tell me under which enumerated power a weapons ban would fall?

    Please correct me if my history isn't quite right: My understanding is that the GFSZA was challenged in US v. Lopez, and was found unconstitutional. After that time, Congress altered the act to add verbiage about guns that "affect" interstate commerce.

    So which enumerated power did Congress exercise when they passed the NFA and the '94 AWB? Is it interstate commerce and/or general welfare?
     

    SirRealism

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Nov 17, 2008
    1,779
    38
    And that's why they go after sale and import, rather than ownership, correct?

    Do you know if Montana made headway re: the ability to mfr and sell NFA items within the state?
     

    Kirk Freeman

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    9   0   0
    Mar 9, 2008
    48,032
    113
    Lafayette, Indiana
    And that's why they go after sale and import, rather than ownership, correct?

    I am not understanding. Not go after ownership?

    Ownership of things Congress forbids is illegal, e.g. marijuana.

    Do you know if Montana made headway re: the ability to mfr and sell NFA items within the state?

    I have no idea what you are referencing. Perhaps some gunshop embellished version of the FFA (the Montana's statute only pertained to Title I firearms)?:dunno:

    Montana Firearms Freedom Act - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
     

    SirRealism

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Nov 17, 2008
    1,779
    38
    I am not understanding. Not go after ownership?

    Ownership of things Congress forbids is illegal, e.g. marijuana.

    I realize that Congress forbids things like marijuana. But I've just recently begun to look more closely at everything Congress does to find out exactly what authority they used. I took too much for granted in the past.

    That's all.

    I have no idea what you are referencing. Perhaps some gunshop embellished version of the FFA (the Montana's statute only pertained to Title I firearms)?:dunno:

    Montana Firearms Freedom Act - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    What is the gunshop embellishment? If the MFFA applies to suppressors, doesn't the act imply that at Montana could sell suppressors (an NFA item) within its borders without a tax stamp?
     

    Kirk Freeman

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    9   0   0
    Mar 9, 2008
    48,032
    113
    Lafayette, Indiana
    What is the gunshop embellishment?

    8th graders talking about sex.:laugh:

    Talking-half correct information and mashing it into the same hamburger patty as correct information.


    If the MFFA applies to suppressors, doesn't the act imply that at Montana could sell suppressors (an NFA item) within its borders without a tax stamp?

    The FFA applied to suppressors, but not all of the NFA.
     

    SirRealism

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Nov 17, 2008
    1,779
    38
    I knew what A gunshop embellishment was. I just didn't understand WHICH embellishment I had fallen prey to. :) Alles klar.
     

    ryknoll3

    Master
    Rating - 75%
    3   1   0
    Sep 7, 2009
    2,719
    48
    8th graders talking about sex.:laugh:

    Talking-half correct information and mashing it into the same hamburger patty as correct information.




    The FFA applied to suppressors, but not all of the NFA.

    The FFA applied to all firearms, except that it specifically exempted MG's.
     

    Expat

    Pdub
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    23   0   0
    Feb 27, 2010
    109,677
    113
    Michiana
    Here is a question I have puzzled over Kirk. How does .gov have the ability to make marijuana illegal but they needed a Constitutional Amendment to make alcohol illegal?

    Having read a veto memorandum issued by President James Madison on a bill passed by the Congress (I believe highways was the subject), I am quite certain he would disagree that the Commerce Clause would be applicable to an AWB.
     

    Kirk Freeman

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    9   0   0
    Mar 9, 2008
    48,032
    113
    Lafayette, Indiana
    Here is a question I have puzzled over Kirk. How does .gov have the ability to make marijuana illegal but they needed a Constitutional Amendment to make alcohol illegal?

    Just ask Owen, a switch in time saved nine.:D


    owen-roberts.jpeg
     

    BravoMike

    Expert
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    Nov 19, 2011
    1,164
    74
    Avon
    they needed a Constitutional Amendment to make alcohol illegal?
    I don't know if this helps answer your question but alcohol wasn't illegal during the prohibition. Its sale, distribution and production was.

    Amendment 18​
    Section. 1. After one year from the ratification of this article the manufacture, sale, or transportation of intoxicating liquors within, the importation thereof into, or the exportation thereof from the United States and all territory subject to the jurisdiction thereof for beverage purposes is hereby prohibited.
    Sec. 2. The Congress and the several States shall have concurrent power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
    Sec. 3. This article shall be inoperative unless it shall have been ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by the legislatures of the several States, as provided in the Constitution, within seven years from the date of the submission hereof to the States by the Congress.
     
    Top Bottom