Accidental Discharge

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Chance317

    Plinker
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Dec 14, 2015
    5
    1
    Indianapolis
    Report: New gun used by LA deputies put public at risk - CNN.com

    I though this was an interesting article on LA Sheriffs switching to the M&P 9mm
    To quote a few things;
    "We conclude that the current training program is insufficient to overcome old habits learned on other handguns," the 52-page report states. "As a result, many deputies appear to be to undertrained for the weapon they are using."

    Adding to the problem was some deputies violating a basic firearms safety rule by placing their finger on the trigger prior to making the conscious decision to fire, the report states.
     

    chipbennett

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Oct 18, 2014
    11,002
    113
    Avon
    So, tell me again about how so much training is required to ensure safe firearms handling?

    A non-LEO can learn the basic layout of a firearm, and the Four Rules, in five minutes. Following that training is all that is required to avoid a negligent discharge for the rest of one's life.

    LEOs have trained for decades - but that training has relied on a particular (and largely obsolete, now) feature of firearms that mitigated the risk of an intentionally trained, inherently unsafe practice that violates one of the Four Rules. How much training would be required to unlearn that inherently unsafe practice? More decades' worth of training?

    Practice makes permanent, after all.

    Edited to add:

    What a stupid headline by CNN. The firearm isn't putting anyone at risk. It is the officers' inherently unsafe behavior that is creating risk. How many non-LEO have carried the Smith & Wesson M&P 9mm, without producing an increase in negligent discharges?
     

    LCSOSgt11

    Expert
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Apr 24, 2009
    843
    18
    LaPorte, IN
    Lunacy. The gun is not the crux of the issue. Poor gunhandling is, in addition to insufficient training and practice. I won't mention the "coonfingering" factor either.
     

    gassprint1

    Expert
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    Dec 15, 2015
    1,277
    113
    NWI
    The only thing putting officers in danger is they are too eager to shoot and ask questions later. Someone has a knife and is walking AWAY, gets shot , and this is justified to have ur finger on the trigger. Too many "yes" men in the world today.
     

    Chance317

    Plinker
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Dec 14, 2015
    5
    1
    Indianapolis
    The headline/article makes the gun the issue, but we all know and can read that it's a user problem of not practicing safe firearm methods.
     
    Top Bottom