15 years of deception; 9/11 reviewed

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Status
    Not open for further replies.

    femurphy77

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    30   0   0
    Mar 5, 2009
    20,279
    113
    S.E. of disorder
    Several thousand people died. Evidence one way or the other won't change that fact. The only thing that will happen when someone uncovers concrete evidence that there is any type of cover up conspiracy is that the person that uncovers it will disappear.

    Beyond that why does any of it matter?
     

    historian

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Oct 15, 2009
    3,301
    63
    SD by residency, Hoosier by heart
    There are holes in the investigation, but since when did the government do anything right? Every other theory presupposes that the government acted in a seamlessly coordinated, perfectly planned and executed manner, which I frankly have never experienced. My theory only has to presuppose they aren't capable of properly handling an investigation.

    Conspiracy Theories in a nutshell. A government which is vastly incompetent, can do what is described above and manage to keep the millions of people necessary to accomplish this task quiet.

    Heck, they couldn't even get Snowden.
     

    bobzilla

    Mod in training (in my own mind)
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Nov 1, 2010
    9,222
    113
    Brownswhitanon.
    Several thousand people died. Evidence one way or the other won't change that fact. The only thing that will happen when someone uncovers concrete evidence that there is any type of cover up conspiracy is that the person that uncovers it will disappear.

    Beyond that why does any of it matter?

    This. I remember watching the plane fly into the second tower live. Are the conspiracies theories trying to tell us that didn't happen? I mean... really?
     

    david890

    Shooter
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Apr 1, 2014
    1,263
    38
    Bloomington
    Ummm. The buildings weighed about 500,000 tons each. Not "several million tons".

    The steel alone was ~ 200K metric tons, and the concrete was 780K metric tons. Add the dead load and live load, and you easily get over 1M metric tons. Okay, possibly not "several" but we have no firm numbers for the dead/live loads.

    LINK
     

    Alpo

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Sep 23, 2014
    13,877
    113
    Indy Metro Area
    The steel alone was ~ 200K metric tons, and the concrete was 780K metric tons. Add the dead load and live load, and you easily get over 1M metric tons. Okay, possibly not "several" but we have no firm numbers for the dead/live loads.

    LINK


    Cite your sources. Let me google my answer for you which comes from numerous sources. Let me google that for you

    Even with your note, "several million tons" is in error.
     

    david890

    Shooter
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Apr 1, 2014
    1,263
    38
    Bloomington
    Demolition is simply one of the easiest things to prove or disprove from the evidence the government couldn't contain. NIST didn't even attempt to disprove it which is rather telling as well. When you see other buildings demolished in a rather tidy fashion by demolition crews, do you ever wonder if maybe it just caught on fire and got weak?

    Please tell me what other 110-story building(s) using the "tube-in-a-tube" design has(ve) been demolished using controlled demolition?

    The record is 439' tall (Hudson's dept store in Detroit), and that wasn't "tube-in-a-tube".
     

    Dan35

    Plinker
    Rating - 100%
    10   0   0
    Jun 21, 2013
    107
    18
    NE Indy
    We are looking at a very small issue here. What took place was much, much bigger.

    Below are some major points of interest about 911 from theWeb. Details (available online) are simply incredible.
    TWIN TOWERS &BUILDING7 http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2013/01/major-general-blasts-911-cover-up.html
    1. Prior to 911, not even one high-rise concreteand steel building had ever completely collapsed due to a plane collision or a fire.Incredibly, both towers completely disintegratedafter a plane crash & only 2–3 hours of fire on a few floors. Each of the 2 collapses was a historic “first”& they both happened on the same morning. A 3rd building (bldg7)wasn’t hit by a plane, but completely collapsed due to fire (another first). Securities& Exchange active investigation files (3,000 – 4,000 of them) and Pentagon accountingfiles were lost in bldg7 destruction.

    2. All 3 buildings collapsed in their own footprint.Twin tower concrete turned to dust inmid-air (another “first”). After viewing all 3 collapses, demolitionexperts insisted that they were the result of “controlled demolition”.

    3. Coincidently, both planes hit the few floors where “insulation upgrades” had justbeen completed. Also a new security system was being installed in both towers inthe week immediately before 911. Electrical power was cut, security cameras wereturned off, doors were left unlocked, and bomb sniffing dogs were removed.
    The main internal support columns, incorporatedinto the central elevatorshafts, had to be compromised for a symmetrical collapse to occur. Immediatelyprior to 911, the elevators were upgraded while ARMED GUARDS were POSTED. Afterthe event, the central support columns of both towers were gone (see onlinepics). Bush’s cousin was the CEO of the security firm for the towers and hisbrother was a board member of the firm.

    4. Larry Silverstein insured all 3 buildings justprior to 911 and made billions from the insurance claims. He said, in relationto building 7, which was not hit by a plane, that after considering the loss oflife already inflicted he told officials to “pull it”. The term, used bydemolition personnel, means to demolish a building. Later Mr. Silversteinexplained that he meant to pull the firemen from the building. However, therewere no firemen in the building.

    5. Thousands of architects, engineers, scientists, doctors,professional pilots, and academics have formed their own professional groups ( http://patriotsquestion911.com) to publicly refute the officialfindings in the 911 commission’s report.They insist all 3 buildings would not have fallen straight down, at almost free fall speed, as theresult of fire. These groups present many other compelling arguments againstthe commission’s findings and show obvious omissions/errors in the official 911report. Individuals lost their jobs after publicly speaking out about their sincereconcerns. Federal Compensation Fund money was used to hush most 911family members.

    6. Moltensteel was found by cleanup crews for weeks, at basement levels of thetowers, as debris was removed from the site. The temperature from the firescould not have melted steel, much less have caused the steel to remain moltenfor weeks. So, what caused such intense and prolonged heat reported by numerouswitnesses?

    7. Independent investigators found compellingevidence of expended military grade Thermite at the towers. The use of Thermitewould explain why/how the buildings collapsed and why molten steel persistedunderground for weeks. Incredibly, the 911 Commission would not even testto see if Thermite had been used.

    8. Explosions were heard, felt, and recorded,before any airplane crashes and after both crashes. Numerous witnesses, both inside and outsideof the buildings, including police, firemen, and on scene reporters spoke ofthe multiple explosions as they happened. Building 7 explosions were reportedas well. However, the official 911 report did not acknowledge any of theseexplosions. Interestingly, seismographs at Columbia University’s EarthInstitute showed spikes before eachtower began to fall, rather than at the completion of the collapses.

    9. Exceptionally large airline stock transactions immediatelypreceded 911, resulting in huge profits for (WHOM)? There was an investigation of this, but the findingswere suppressed and never released!
    10. Evidence from all 3 catastrophes was immediatelysealed off and taken away. Much was sent overseas, thus preventing the opportunityfor examination. The removal of evidence is illegal, but was done anyway. Even theblack boxes from the planes (first said to have vanished) were never released bygovernment for analysis. Much controversycould be eliminated if evidence, which does still exist, was simply madeavailable for independent examination, but after all this time and repeatedrequests to the government this has not happened.

    NEXTTHE PENTAGON, AND THEN THE LAST PLANE
    11. About 45 minutes after the second tower was hitby a plane, the pentagon was also rocked by an explosion. Did the Pentagon REALLY have no defenses for this typeof suicide attack? Why wasn’t thepentagon evacuated? The official story said a third large passenger plane hitthe pentagon. However, on the scene reporters and the evidence led many toquestion this as well. We are told that most of the plane just “vaporized” whenit hit the pentagon, but almost 200 victims were later identified through DNAtesting! How can both possibly betrue?

    12. Flight data recorder information from thegovernment shows that the cockpit door never opened after takeoff. No credible evidence of this large plane havinghit the pentagon has ever been produced. The entry hole in the pentagon wasexceedingly small (15-18 feet wide) comparedto a jumbo jet. Over 80 videos were immediately confiscated by governmentagents. After more than 10 years they remain unavailable for independent scrutiny.

    13. Severalrings within the pentagon were breached, though that part of the building was substantiallyreinforced. How could a plane, which ispurposely made of strong but light weight material, have done such damage? Our government says therewas damage to the voice data recorder and no data was usable. Of all thecrashes which have occurred, this is yet another “first” of a crash destroyinga solid-state data recorder.

    14. While the towers & pentagon were attacked,over a dozen military exercises pulled many jet fighters far from NewYork/Washington area. False radar blips were used for the “first” time. Strict procedural protocol, including the scramblingof fighter jets, was NOT FOLLOWED onthat day.

    15. Citizen groups continue to question officialaccounts of the pentagon attack. “Pilots for Truth” question how a novice smallplane pilot could have flown a large commercial plane through a maneuver thateven seasoned pilots could not achieve. Consider that the plane’s speed was beyondits controllable limits.

    16. A fourth hijackedplane was still in the air and headed for Washington. It didn’t reach thatdestination because either the plane crashed straight down into the earth, asthe passengers tried to overpower the hijackers, or the plane was shot down by ourmilitary. The debris field was said to extend for 8 miles. Also, the gash in the earth (where the planewas said to have crashed) was shown on Google Earth prior to 911. Since the plane took off 41 minutes late, it would betoo obvious to allow it to reach its target (bldg7?), it had to be shot down.You decide.

    17. Incredibly, noneof the 19 hijackers are listed on any passenger manifests for the 4planes! How did they board?
    Also, no wreckage was independently verifiedas being from any of the 4 planes, none.

    More to come .... if you want it.

     

    Captain Bligh

    Sharpshooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Apr 19, 2008
    745
    18
    waaa2 waaa2waaa2 Stay calm. The men in the white coats are on their way. waaawaaawaaa

    Paranoia strikes deep
    Into your life it will creep
    It starts when you're always afraid
    You step out of line, the man come and take you away
    We better stop, hey, what's that sound
    Everybody look what's going down

    ~ Buffalo Springfield


    :shady:
     

    Dan35

    Plinker
    Rating - 100%
    10   0   0
    Jun 21, 2013
    107
    18
    NE Indy
    Thank you for your insightful comments ... to continue

    THE RESPONSES TO 911
    1. The White House adamantly resisted any attemptsto have an independent commission look into 911. After months of unrelentingpublic pressure, a partisan group was formed by the White House to investigate911. This commission was given little time, insufficient money, no subpoenapowers, and directives by the White House as to what it could not investigate.The President and VP finally agreed to meet with the commission for 1 hour if: theywere not under oath, both would meet at the same time, no recording ortranscripts allowed, White House to screen answers. Even 911 commission chairmenwere critical of their own investigation and the final report. FOIA requests for information that wouldshed light on this event have been consistently denied by government.
    2. Why didn’t the media DEMAND that a fullinvestigation of 9/11 be conducted? Why did the media coalesce around theofficial 911 explanations and then withdraw access to their own videos that werecontradictory? Why did the media stop investigating/reporting on all of the unanswered911 questions? Why does the FBI continue to insist it has no proof Bin Ladenwas responsible for the 9/11 attack?

    3. Why in May 2001, after 50 years of success, wasthe scrambling of aircraft transferred to Sec. Defense and V.P.? Why then wereDick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Gen. Myers, allabsent during the first hour of the attack?

    4. Why, after hearing of the second crash, did the Presidentcontinue to sit with the children in a Florida classroom for another 15 minutesand then stay at the school for yet another 15-20 minutes beyond that? Wasn’t it possible or even likely that thePresident was in imminent danger and therefore those around him (the school children)were in danger as well? Why would his well-trained security personnel allowthis half hour delay? Consider that the VP was immediately lifted up by SecretService agents and moved to a more secure location. Why, after all that justhappened, were jet fighters still NOToverhead to protect school children & President?

    5. Why were false radar blips used, for the “first” time, on 911? Why was the planethat was said to have hit the pentagon (45 minutes after the second tower was hit) not shot down accordingto protocol? Was there a “stand down” order? Alternatively, if the military was completelyincompetent in carrying out its duties, who was punished for grossincompetence? Instead, why were those in command given promotions shortly after911?

    6. Why did the White House change EPA warningsabout Toxicity at the WTC, saying it was safe to work there? Go online, seewhat happened to public servants who willingly participated in 911 cleanupefforts. Quite appalling!

    7. Why is public rejection of the official 911report growing each year as: scientists, engineers, architects, professionalpilots, academics, doctors, law enforcement and security personnel, firemen,human services personnel, and general public continue to review all newly availableevidence? The MAJORITY of Americans now believe 911 involved governmentcover-up and a new independent investigation is needed. Who is stopping it?

    8. Who even knows about Rumsfeld’s admission, 1 dayprior to 911, that the pentagon was unable to account for 2.3 TRILLIONdollars? Incredibly, that same pentagon accounting data was destroyed on 911. Thedata backup site was also destroyed. Itwas in Bldg7!! Those investigatingthe case met at the Pentagon on the morning of 911 and most were killed in the explosion. Are you comfortable with all these aberrations/ coincidences? Why do our congress men/women act as if sufficient explanation of911 has been given and further investigation is unnecessary? Why do they refuseto subpoena government witnesses who beg to be questioned under oath, so thatthey can speak? Why is there still no accountability for all the 911failures and unanswered questions?
    Many of our citizens want to believe the “Official story” of911 because the alternative is just too offensive. However, thousands ofpatriotic Americans have been trying to unravel 911. They persisted when theywere called “Truthers”, “Conspiracy Nuts”, “Un-American”, etc.. They persisted because they knew that it wasright to do so and wrong to just turn away and accept the unbelievable. At theleast this was our biggest intelligence and military failure. At worst, it wasa calculated “False Flag” attack(See:the Maine, Operation Northwood, Gulf of Tonkin incident, WMD, Pearl Harbor, etc).America changed after 911. Our freedoms and Constitutional Rights are quickly beingtraded for “security”. Additionally, 911launched us into over 10 years of wars that continue yet today. What is reallygoing on here? Think about it!!!
    Are we safer today than before 911? What did we gain andwhat did we lose? Who benefited from the next 10 years? Afterover a decade our natural response is to try to understand what did happen, whyit happened, and how can we guard against it in the future. Curiously, thegovernment continues to impede our search for the truth. And why is that?Read, use the Web, investigate, talk about what you find. Decide foryourself, based on the facts, what really happened.
     

    KJQ6945

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Aug 5, 2012
    37,562
    149
    Texas
    This just keeps getting better...........

    It's like the the concealed carry thread, only crazier, with a big splash of ****ing nuts.
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.
    Top Bottom