Indianapolis Flock security camera opinions

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • rosejm

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    11   0   0
    Nov 28, 2013
    1,786
    129
    NWI
    View attachment 302806

    Hooligans in Britain has a way to deal with them FLOCK or speed cameras...just saying
    I don't think that level of destruction is even required. An appropriately aimed spitwad or airborn shopping bag will still disable the camera and not earn you a felony.

    And maybe that's not even needed. Perhaps it's just a sign ziptied to the pole for awareness
    wall-stickers-big-brother-is-watching-you.png
     

    Dog1

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    36   0   0
    Feb 15, 2010
    2,762
    113
    Clark County, Indiana
    I don't think that level of destruction is even required. An appropriately aimed spitwad or airborn shopping bag will still disable the camera and not earn you a felony.

    And maybe that's not even needed. Perhaps it's just a sign ziptied to the pole for awareness
    wall-stickers-big-brother-is-watching-you.png


    I think it's appropriate. Just to be sure.
     

    DoggyDaddy

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    73   0   1
    Aug 18, 2011
    104,495
    149
    Southside Indy
    FLOCK takes it a step further and aggregates those data points, rather than simply tossing out the "check" when it returns clean.
    But FLOCK isn't doing anything with the plate numbers (other than taking pictures of them and storing the pics). They're not checking anything, nor do they have access to anything to determine whether it's "clean" or not. That's what Denny has been trying to tell everyone all along.
     

    rosejm

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    11   0   0
    Nov 28, 2013
    1,786
    129
    NWI
    But FLOCK isn't doing anything with the plate numbers (other than taking pictures of them and storing the pics). They're not checking anything, nor do they have access to anything to determine whether it's "clean" or not. That's what Denny has been trying to tell everyone all along.
    Perhaps in a "well we didn't do it" way... those plate numbers are going to the local authorities and checked for stolen/expired/wanted statuses. That's the "service" that is being sold to the government.

    They're also keeping the pictures/plate numbers after submission, and that database is their work product so they can sell it to any other interested parties who are willing to pay.


    Flock Safety cameras apply machine learning to the footage they capture to identify important details that traditional LPR cameras overlook. Besides just a license plate number, Flock Safety captures and organizes vehicles into categories based on:
    • Make
    • Model
    • Color
    • Resident or non-resident vehicle
    • Timestamp
    • Type of plate (standard v. temporary)
    • Damage or alterations (i.e. broken taillight, after-market wheels) - ed. note: this includes bumper stickers!
     
    Last edited:

    DoggyDaddy

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    73   0   1
    Aug 18, 2011
    104,495
    149
    Southside Indy
    Well, perhaps in a round about way... those plate numbers are going to the local authorities and checked for stolen/expired/wanted statuses. That's the "service" that is being sold to the government.

    They're also keeping the pictures/plate numbers after submission, and that database is their work product so they can sell it to any other interested parties who are willing to pay.
    I'm not sure of the legalities, but I would think there would be conditions established in contracts to prevent that. At least I hope so.
     

    rosejm

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    11   0   0
    Nov 28, 2013
    1,786
    129
    NWI
    I'm not sure of the legalities, but I would think there would be conditions established in contracts to prevent that. At least I hope so.
    I'd prefer to eliminate the ability, rather than rely on contractual duty. Similar to how warrant-less FISA searches would only be used on terrorists. For varying definitions of terrorism. Or whenever it's convenient... but when and why is Top Secret National Security.


    And I'm still not OK with this aggregation of data even if it's only going to the government.



    Don't you see..
    It's in the interest of keeping everyone safe.
    Well then, I stand corrected! Who needs protection from government overreach, as long as we're only using it to identify and capture criminals...
     

    loudgroove

    Expert
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Jul 7, 2023
    970
    93
    Lagrange Indiana
    I'd prefer to eliminate the ability, rather than rely on contractual duty. Similar to how warrant-less FISA searches would only be used on terrorists. For varying definitions of terrorism. Or whenever it's convenient... but when and why is Top Secret National Security.


    And I'm still not OK with this aggregation of data even if it's only going to the government.




    Well then, I stand corrected! Who needs protection from government overreach, as long as we're only using it to identify and capture criminals...
    I agree that we should do away with anything that is subject to government abuse and overreach. And let us not forget many liberal politicians have tried to make criminals out of law-abiding gun owning citizens in one form or another.
     

    firecadet613

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    34   0   1
    Dec 24, 2012
    2,258
    113
    But FLOCK isn't doing anything with the plate numbers (other than taking pictures of them and storing the pics). They're not checking anything, nor do they have access to anything to determine whether it's "clean" or not. That's what Denny has been trying to tell everyone all along.
    Sure. They have a giant database of license plate numbers. Enter a plate number and see exactly when and where that car was...
     

    Denny347

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    21   0   0
    Mar 18, 2008
    13,458
    149
    Napganistan
    Flock sounds to me like a government contractor of some sort with maybe as agenda of their own or could be colluding with any said political party or any other thing that we aren't in the know of. I know this sounds like I am wearing a tin foil hat, But is there proof that something like this Isn't happening?
    You cannot prove a negative. If you are advocating a collusion, it is up to YOU to show your work.
    Now getting on to the no privacy in public. The average guy gets upset when they notice that some dude is staring their ol lady up and down, or a lady notices the same thing with their ol man getting stared at. Is this not the same? It's called being respectful not to do that. And one should expect the same from the government!! And something that my grandpa always use to say, just because you can do something does not mean you should.
    We are speaking about legality, not "respect".
     

    Denny347

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    21   0   0
    Mar 18, 2008
    13,458
    149
    Napganistan
    They're also keeping the pictures/plate numbers after submission, and that database is their work product so they can sell it to any other interested parties who are willing to pay.
    I'm still not clear how a company monetizes a picture of the rear of an anonymous vehicle with a location. There are no owner details associated with the pictures. Why would a company PAY for that data?
     
    Top Bottom