Explain this to me as if I am a 5 year old.

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Cameramonkey

    www.thechosen.tv
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    35   0   0
    May 12, 2013
    32,044
    77
    Camby area
    He talks about 'discussion'. Yet he doesn't seem to come back and reply, or offer counterpoints.

    Drop bomb.
    Leave.
    Seems to be the M.O.
    In all fairness, he hasnt been online since. Heck, I had other things to do today too but got weathered out.

    We will observe and hope that he returns to give his side. Mods are watching in hopes the pattern doesnt continue. I'm actually interested to hear how he squares his opinion on the matter.

    Hey, at least they arent one liners anymore. I'll give him that. He is listening to us.
     

    GodFearinGunTotin

    Super Moderator
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Mar 22, 2011
    50,989
    113
    Mitchell
    He talks about 'discussion'. Yet he doesn't seem to come back and reply, or offer counterpoints.

    Drop bomb.
    Leave.
    Seems to be the M.O.
    Yeah, my impression is this is some sort of passive aggressive insulting technique. On the other hand, iron sharpens iron. It’s good to have noobs come in and do their best to state their case. We can handle it. We might make a convert out of him.
     

    actaeon277

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Nov 20, 2011
    93,378
    113
    Merrillville
    Yeah, my impression is this is some sort of passive aggressive insulting technique. On the other hand, iron sharpens iron. It’s good to have noobs come in and do their best to state their case. We can handle it. We might make a convert out of him.
    It's not sharpening, when it's the same arguments.
    A simple INGO search, or internet search, would have given him the same results.
    He obviously is unwilling to bother.
     

    Lpherr

    ________________
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Dec 26, 2021
    7,345
    113
    Occupied
    It's not sharpening, when it's the same arguments.
    A simple INGO search, or internet search, would have given him the same results.
    He obviously is unwilling to bother.
    My first stop isn't Google.
    I prefer to ask my stupid questions, to people I'm familiar with.
    Even if they do talk S***.;)
     

    freekforge

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    12   0   0
    Jul 20, 2012
    2,764
    113
    marion
    Sounds like one of those unfortunate military guys who is all "for me but not for thee" because special training or something.
    Exactly what I was thinking. And the most dangerous people I've seen with guns are the "experts" in the military. I worked as rso for an army unit and it was scary. Second most dangerous were the other cops I worked with.
     

    jamil

    code ho
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 17, 2011
    60,653
    113
    Gtown-ish
    It's not sharpening, when it's the same arguments.
    A simple INGO search, or internet search, would have given him the same results.
    He obviously is unwilling to bother.
    Starting off like “explain it to me like I’m 5,” doesn’t make it sound like he’s ever imagined a world in which he’s the one who’s full of ****.

    Someone shoots a bunch of kids in school. His worldview: :runaway: why can’t those awful gun owners agree to give up their AR-15’s? It’s their fault. They have blood on their hands!

    My wotldview: the blame for the school shootings belongs on the person who did it. But also, the reason it happens so frequently isn’t because of the availability of guns. It’s that society has produced broken offspring who sees this as a way out of their broken world. My firearms have nothing to do with it.
     
    Last edited:

    jamil

    code ho
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 17, 2011
    60,653
    113
    Gtown-ish
    I don’t like golf, it should be banned. Look at the fertilizer, pesticides, herbicides, fungicides that poison the land, the streams, soak down into the ground water. Surely we call agree that golfers are little more than environmental terrorists.
    Okay. But not women’s golf.

     

    GodFearinGunTotin

    Super Moderator
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Mar 22, 2011
    50,989
    113
    Mitchell

    actaeon277

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Nov 20, 2011
    93,378
    113
    Merrillville
    Starting off like “explain it to me like I’m 5,” doesn’t make it sound like he’s ever imagined a world in which he’s the one who’s full of ****.

    Someone shoots a bunch of kids in school. His worldview: :runaway: why can’t those awful gun owners agree to give up their AR-15’s? It’s their fault. They have blood on their hands!

    My wotldview: the blame for the schools shootings belongs on the person who did it. But also, the reason it happens so frequently isn’t because of the availability of guns. It’s that society has produced broken offspring who sees this as a way out of their broken world. My firearms have nothing to do with it.

    Someone shoots a bunch of kids in school. His worldview: :runaway: why can’t those awful gun owners agree to give up their AR-15’s? It’s their fault. They have blood on their hands!

    And yet, he'll have no problem driving that 2 ton killing machine.
    Cars kill WAY MORE than 'assault weapons'.
     

    Leadeye

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Jan 19, 2009
    36,925
    113
    .
    US v Miller (1939) upheld the NFA. That particular Miller was dead by the time it got to SCOTUS. Don't know if anybody showed up on Miller's behalf. Since 1939 was 21 years past the end of WW I, there would have been a lot of WW I Vets available to testify to how SBRs and SBSs were essential to "The Militia". But alas, Miller was dead so (IMHO) that has a lot to do with how we got here.

    The NFA was a tax, the Hughs amendment was a ban. SCOTUS upheld the NFA on the basis that congress could tax anything it wanted to. To my knowledge there has never been a challenge of the Hughs amendment get very far if at all.

    The government created it's own problem with NFA items by devaluing the currency so that by the 1970s you were paying the same for a MAC-10 and tax that you were for a Colt Python. This ushered in the "golden age" of NFA, a brief time when it looked like we were back to pre NFA days simply because $200 was not worth what it was in 1934.
     
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Mar 9, 2022
    2,293
    113
    Bloomington
    The reality is, we have always drawn lines at which civilians are limited by law with regard to which weapons they may own.
    No we haven't. Early on many ordinary citizens owned the same kinds of weapons of war that the military used.
    Thank you, jamil! This point needs to be made far more loudly and far more often. Despite being peddled by supposed experts, and even those in the highest levels of political leadership, it is a complete, 100% myth that there were any weapons outlawed for civilian ownership in the early days of our country. Start looking for examples of gun control in our country's early days, and guess what you'll find: it's that the first gun control efforts were intended to stop blacks and Indians from owning firearms. Think about that. They understood very well back then that the first step to oppressing and enslaving someone is to disarm him.
     

    billybob44

    Master
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    385   0   0
    Sep 22, 2010
    3,445
    47
    In the Man Cave
    The truth is @mrmiller21 is trying to goad members into name calling and such that will force the mods to give those members a time out like he got. He is doing it by attacking our deeply and sincerely held beliefs in a mocking but allowed way.

    DO NOT TAKE HIS BAIT! Be careful not to call names or anything that might get you suspended. That us the goal of all these threads…
    Did NOT see that they "Shooter" him yet??
     
    Top Bottom