Chevrolet unveils its biggest, most powerful V8 engine.

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Jaybird1980

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Jan 22, 2016
    11,929
    113
    North Central
    How much would an engine like this weigh?

    Would you essentially a HD diesel truck transmission, driveshaft bits, and rear end to make it go?
    Because it's an iron block, I would guess weight between 6-650lbs.

    There are plenty of trans rated higher than 1000hp. There are even some 1000hp 700r4's which seems crazy to me.
     

    Jaybird1980

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Jan 22, 2016
    11,929
    113
    North Central
    Having built quite a few engines and a Chevy guy I would love to see one of these in person. Some things that stand out to me is the peak numbers are at fairly low RPM's. 1000hp at 6600rpm is pretty low.

    I also see it's distributor less ignition. Looks like some LS style coil packs hiding under the air gap intake.
     

    JeepHammer

    SHOOTER
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Aug 2, 2018
    1,904
    83
    SW Indiana

    No replacement for displacement!

    Wonder what it would do with a BDS screw blower on it? ;)

    With electric motors on the way that will match horsepower & beat torque, I'd say this might be the last 'Mountian Motor'...

    So, where is the 70 Vega or 80 Chevette to stuff it into? :)
    Can you fit it under the hood of a 70 Camaro? Chevelle?

    Yup, I'm *THAT* generation...
     

    churchmouse

    I still care....Really
    Emeritus
    Rating - 100%
    187   0   0
    Dec 7, 2011
    191,809
    152
    Speedway area
    No replacement for displacement!

    Wonder what it would do with a BDS screw blower on it? ;)

    With electric motors on the way that will match horsepower & beat torque, I'd say this might be the last 'Mountian Motor'...

    So, where is the 70 Vega or 80 Chevette to stuff it into? :)
    Can you fit it under the hood of a 70 Camaro? Chevelle?

    Yup, I'm *THAT* generation...
    That will fit between the fenders of most GM offerings and yes I agree our time draws close to its end.
    But say what you will. A stupid fast electric car is fun to watch a couple of times but with out the thunder its really just not the same.
     

    Gunmetalgray

    Sharpshooter
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    Jul 14, 2021
    561
    93
    not lost, wandering...
    I feel the need...

    24904-1997-Chevrolet-Camaro.jpg

    Modern tech in 60's muscle, match made in heaven.
     

    JeepHammer

    SHOOTER
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Aug 2, 2018
    1,904
    83
    SW Indiana
    That will fit between the fenders of most GM offerings and yes I agree our time draws close to its end.
    But say what you will. A stupid fast electric car is fun to watch a couple of times but with out the thunder its really just not the same.

    Electric cars don't rattle the bleachers so much all women are horny after watching a few races!

    Just like a rice grinder is never going to do to women what a Harley engine does.
     

    thunderchicken

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Feb 26, 2010
    6,444
    113
    Indianapolis
    No replacement for displacement!

    Wonder what it would do with a BDS screw blower on it? ;)

    With electric motors on the way that will match horsepower & beat torque, I'd say this might be the last 'Mountian Motor'...

    So, where is the 70 Vega or 80 Chevette to stuff it into? :)
    Can you fit it under the hood of a 70 Camaro? Chevelle?

    Yup, I'm *THAT* generation...
    Umm sorry but a 632 is NOT a Mountain Motor. Not even close unless you are talking 1980s technology.
     

    edporch

    Master
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    25   0   0
    Oct 19, 2010
    4,681
    149
    Indianapolis
    From https://www.chevrolet.com/performance-parts/crate-engines/big-block/zz-632
    Here's the specs on this engine.

    ZZ632/1000 DELUXE TECH SPECS​

    • Part Number: 19432060
    • Engine Type: Chevy Tall-Deck Big-Block V-8
    • Displacement (cu. in.): 632 cu. in.
    • Bore x Stroke (in.): 4.600 x 4.750 in.
    • Block: Cast Iron Bowtie with 4-bolt main caps-tall deck
    • Crankshaft: Forged 4340 steel
    • Connecting Rods: Forged steel H-beam
    • Pistons: Forged aluminum 2618 alloy
    • Intake Manifold: Aluminum high-rise single-plane
    • Throttle Body: 4500-style
    • Fuel Injectors: 86-lb/hr
    • Camshaft Type: Billet Steel Hydraulic Roller
    • Valve Lift (in.): 0.780 intake/0.782 exhaust
    • Camshaft Duration (@0.050 in.): 270º intake/287º exhaust
    • Cylinder Heads: Aluminum spread-port; 70cc chambers -RS-X design
    • Valve Size (in.): 2.450 intake/1.800 exhaust,Titanium (5/16-in stem OD)
    • Ignition Type: 58X crank-triggered, coil-near-plug
    • Compression Ratio: 12.0:1 (nominal)
    • Rocker Arms: Forged aluminum; roller-style
    • Rocker Arm Ratio: 1.8:1 (shaft-mount)
    • Water Pump: Aluminum
    • Oil Pan: Steel 8-quart
    • Recommended Fuel: Premium pump (93 octane or higher)
    • Maximum Recommended RPM: 7,000
    • Balanced: Internal
     

    thunderchicken

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Feb 26, 2010
    6,444
    113
    Indianapolis
    Ok so many here know I'm not a Chevy guy but I applaud what they are trying to do here.
    I'm a guy that has been around really fast door slammer drag cars for many years and I can't help but say what a FREAKING PIG!
    Seriously, ANY 632 cubic inch "race" engine should make 1100-1200+ hp. I'll give a couple examples why I say that.
    I have a friend who has a 585 cu in BBC (single carb) that's probably 20yrs old and makes 994 hp. We had a 588 cu in BBF (single carb)that made 1026 hp when we built it back in 2004. Then we had a 598 cu in BBF (single carb) that made 1198 hp. Now our 632+ cu in BBF makes 1200+ with dual carbs but the heads are a 30+ year old design (specifics are a secret). Many many drag racers have been running 632" chevy engines for a good 20 yrs now and I know a few who run E85 and make those kinds of hp numbers.

    Edit- on our engines (588, 598 632+) those hp numbers are with no power adders. But, all were built to run on nitrous. So, due to cam profile they don't make as much hp as they would with a cam design for Naturally Aspirated.
     
    Last edited:

    thunderchicken

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Feb 26, 2010
    6,444
    113
    Indianapolis
    From https://www.chevrolet.com/performance-parts/crate-engines/big-block/zz-632
    Here's the specs on this engine.

    ZZ632/1000 DELUXE TECH SPECS​

    • Part Number: 19432060
    • Engine Type: Chevy Tall-Deck Big-Block V-8
    • Displacement (cu. in.): 632 cu. in.
    • Bore x Stroke (in.): 4.600 x 4.750 in.
    • Block: Cast Iron Bowtie with 4-bolt main caps-tall deck
    • Crankshaft: Forged 4340 steel
    • Connecting Rods: Forged steel H-beam
    • Pistons: Forged aluminum 2618 alloy
    • Intake Manifold: Aluminum high-rise single-plane
    • Throttle Body: 4500-style
    • Fuel Injectors: 86-lb/hr
    • Camshaft Type: Billet Steel Hydraulic Roller
    • Valve Lift (in.): 0.780 intake/0.782 exhaust
    • Camshaft Duration (@0.050 in.): 270º intake/287º exhaust
    • Cylinder Heads: Aluminum spread-port; 70cc chambers -RS-X design
    • Valve Size (in.): 2.450 intake/1.800 exhaust,Titanium (5/16-in stem OD)
    • Ignition Type: 58X crank-triggered, coil-near-plug
    • Compression Ratio: 12.0:1 (nominal)
    • Rocker Arms: Forged aluminum; roller-style
    • Rocker Arm Ratio: 1.8:1 (shaft-mount)
    • Water Pump: Aluminum
    • Oil Pan: Steel 8-quart
    • Recommended Fuel: Premium pump (93 octane or higher)
    • Maximum Recommended RPM: 7,000
    • Balanced: Internal
    It's got good stuff. I think the cam could be a little bigger just based off other comparable engines I've been around.
     

    churchmouse

    I still care....Really
    Emeritus
    Rating - 100%
    187   0   0
    Dec 7, 2011
    191,809
    152
    Speedway area
    I agree it's no barn burner compared to full tilt engines. The smaller cam specs suggest this thing is for more longevity to me. Would make a really good engine for a dragster.
    Hyd roller is not letting it sing.
    Full mechanical valve train and assorted other mods and Chickens numbers are attainable. It would push the power band north of 6600. Parts are stressed more. Longevity is compromised.
     
    Top Bottom