hopfdubois
Plinker
Hiya. So I've been browsing the forum for some time now, and I've noticed that when referring to the right to keep and bear arms you guys always call this a person's "constitutional right", when it ought to be called, and truly is, a person's natural right. The Constitution does NOT give a person this right, they are born with it, the constitution merely protects it. This is a very important distinction and I felt that I needed to call you guys out on it. Far too often I've seen people on here call it a "constitutional right" and it pisses me off to no end.
Thanks
EDIT: I meant to say natural right, not human right. I've replaced "human right" with natural right in this post. Thanks fellas!
Thanks
EDIT: I meant to say natural right, not human right. I've replaced "human right" with natural right in this post. Thanks fellas!
Last edited: