To be fair to CNN they have turned the comments off on a lot of their articles. I'm sure you're surprised to learn that a lot of the contentious articles and opinion pieces are usually available for comments thoughGee, comments for the article are off. I wonder why.
Yep, that was my thinking. Actual shots fired will heavily skew it towards criminal behavior because the defensive use of a gun more often than not does not require an actual shot fired. But the defensive gun uses, by the FBI's own stats, outnumber all GSWs and deaths combined by several orders of magnitude.I didn't see anything on there about incidents where guns were drawn and not fired. If they are going to include police shootings in their stats, then they need to include no shoots as well.
In airports mainlyCNN........is that still a thing?
Link pleaseInterestingly, there is an article on Politico today about "The Gunfight In Cyberspace" about how a woman who bought a Magpul iPhone case was repulsed when she found out that GASP Magpul made evil assault clips and AK15 parts and left a negative review on Amazon...and how shiz rolled downhill from there, and how "gun safety" advocates have turned to internet campaigns aimed at corporate policies to get changes they seek.
Even has quotes from Indiana's favorite "mom".
I'd consider it a coincidence...but ain't no way the timing is coincidental.
They'd also have to do a follow report on the cases which were initially prosecuted as murders but later found to be self defense. The project is designed to be propaganda for the ignorant.I didn't see anything on there about incidents where guns were drawn and not fired. If they are going to include police shootings in their stats, then they need to include no shoots as well.
They'd also have to do a follow report on the cases which were initially prosecuted as murders but later found to be self defense. The project is designed to be propaganda for the ignorant.