Al-Qaeda forces capture Fallujah, Iraq... declare it an Islamic state

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Jludo

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    Feb 14, 2013
    4,164
    48
    Indianapolis
    Last edited:

    jbombelli

    ITG Certified
    Rating - 100%
    10   0   0
    May 17, 2008
    13,014
    113
    Brownsburg, IN
    While the anger is understandable, the US Military isn't supposed to be in the vendetta business. If Dubya did Invade Iraq because of that (and I disagree that he did), he should at least be willing to fight himself rather than put other people in harm's way. "Everything" in your "power," is easy, when it isn't your blood being spilt.

    The military is in the business of doing what it's told. World War 1 started with the assassination of one man. This sort of thing often starts wars. I'm sure you understand that. And Hussein surely knew that. He gambled and lost.
     

    Jludo

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    Feb 14, 2013
    4,164
    48
    Indianapolis
    The military is in the business of doing what it's told. World War 1 started with the assassination of one man. This sort of thing often starts wars. I'm sure you understand that. And Hussein surely knew that. He gambled and lost.

    Who really lost though? Would anyone say the cost in lives and treasure justified killing one dictator?
     

    jbombelli

    ITG Certified
    Rating - 100%
    10   0   0
    May 17, 2008
    13,014
    113
    Brownsburg, IN
    I guess some people around here are okay with foreign powers assassinating our elected leaders or former elected leaders. Or at least ignoring them when they try.

    Does that about sum it up?
     

    ForceTA308

    Plinker
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Sep 4, 2012
    74
    6
    One question is this. Does the average goat farmer in Iraq have a better or worse quality of life for us invading? He isn't concerned with what Saddam did or didn't do or if we were justified in invading. If his life is worse, he'll blame America. Did we create more terrorists than we eliminated?

    I would say that's a double edged sword. There were people, families, and even communities where we aided in their infrastructure and quality of life. This was mostly when it came to farming, irrigation, removal of IED's or other dangerous environments that they were subject to just as us, etc... However, I'm sure there was collateral damage caused that would result in what you're saying here. Maybe not the extent to create a terrorist of all of them but certainly resentment towards our presence and America in general.
     

    hornadylnl

    Shooter
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Nov 19, 2008
    21,505
    63
    I guess some people around here are okay with foreign powers assassinating our elected leaders or former elected leaders. Or at least ignoring them when they try.

    Does that about sum it up?

    I guess some people around here are okay with our government sending of 4486 people to die for our elected leaders or former elected leaders. Luckily they themselves weren't one of the 4486.

    Does that about sum it up?

    I'm sure you'd willingly sacrifice that many men and women if the assassination attempt were on an Obama family member.
     

    Jludo

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    Feb 14, 2013
    4,164
    48
    Indianapolis
    I guess some people around here are okay with foreign powers assassinating our elected leaders or former elected leaders. Or at least ignoring them when they try.

    Does that about sum it up?

    Who's ok with foreign powers assassinating our elected leaders ? It just doesn't justify the Iraq invasion. That'd be a false dichotomy.
    How many times has the CIA tried to assassinate or overthrow a foreign leader?
     

    hornadylnl

    Shooter
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Nov 19, 2008
    21,505
    63
    I would say that's a double edged sword. There were people, families, and even communities where we aided in their infrastructure and quality of life. This was mostly when it came to farming, irrigation, removal of IED's or other dangerous environments that they were subject to just as us, etc... However, I'm sure there was collateral damage caused that would result in what you're saying here. Maybe not the extent to create a terrorist of all of them but certainly resentment towards our presence and America in general.

    I don't know what percentage of Iraqis hate us more now than they did before or not. But many seem to believe that no matter what we do abroad, it should never have any consequences such as creating more terrorists. If I were a goat farmer in Iraq or Afghanistan and a US bomb killed my family, I wouldn't much care what Saddam did or didn't do.
     

    Jludo

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    Feb 14, 2013
    4,164
    48
    Indianapolis
    I guess some people around here are okay with our government sending of 4486 people to die for our elected leaders or former elected leaders. Luckily they themselves weren't one of the 4486.

    Does that about sum it up?

    I'm sure you'd willingly sacrifice that many men and women if the assassination attempt were on an Obama family member.

    Exactly, what's the value of a US elected official in US peoples lives? I'd argue a US politician is no more valuable than any other US citizen...
     

    hornadylnl

    Shooter
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Nov 19, 2008
    21,505
    63
    Exactly, what's the value of a US elected official in US peoples lives? I'd argue a US politician is no more valuable than any other US citizen...

    I'm betting the party affiliation will weigh heavily on the value.
     

    Dead Duck

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    53   0   0
    Apr 1, 2011
    14,062
    113
    .
    It's just pretty clear we accomplished plenty [STRIKE]nothing and if anything made it worse[/STRIKE]. The people there are [STRIKE]n't[/STRIKE] definitely better off, [STRIKE]we aren't better off[/STRIKE]. Kind of makes everyone realize what a colossal mistake [STRIKE]invading[/STRIKE] pulling out was.

    FIFY


    So - Getting gassed and tortured by your own government is a good thing?
    Or do you just disagree with anything my country's soldiers do, out of some principal of yours.
     

    Kutnupe14

    Troll Emeritus
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 13, 2011
    40,294
    149
    FIFY


    So - Getting gassed and tortured by your own government is a good thing?
    Or do you just disagree with anything my country's soldiers do, out of some principal of yours.

    What makes Iraq's internal affairs our business?
     

    ViperJock

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    10   0   0
    Feb 28, 2011
    3,811
    48
    Fort Wayne-ish
    One question is this. Does the average goat farmer in Iraq have a better or worse quality of life for us invading? He isn't concerned with what Saddam did or didn't do or if we were justified in invading. If his life is worse, he'll blame America. Did we create more terrorists than we eliminated?

    Does the average corn farmer in Indiana care if he has no rights and his life is forfeit to the whims of a mass murdering tyrant?

    You're right. It's not a big deal to have no freedom. I don't know why INGO gets all excited about the loss of rights when people who don't have them so clearly don't miss them at all. Period. End of story.
     

    88GT

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 29, 2010
    16,643
    83
    Familyfriendlyville
    One question is this. Does the average goat farmer in Iraq have a better or worse quality of life for us invading? He isn't concerned with what Saddam did or didn't do or if we were justified in invading. If his life is worse, he'll blame America. Did we create more terrorists than we eliminated?
    No. Saddam did that by bringing hell down on his people with his arrogant invasion of Kuwait.

    What makes Iraq's internal affairs our business?
    When they violate ceasefire terms we are enforcing, I would say that makes it our business. Would you not enforce the terms of the ceasefire?

    It was absolutely a mistake to invade, plain and simple.
    Based on what. You have presented an opinion, but have provided nothing to support it. We had every authority to invade. There is no debate. But I don't believe that there is an absolute on whether or not the decision to do so was good/bad/indifferent. The answer probably varies depending on which consideration is placed in the limelight.
     

    Jludo

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    Feb 14, 2013
    4,164
    48
    Indianapolis
    FIFY


    So - Getting gassed and tortured by your own government is a good thing?
    Or do you just disagree with anything my country's soldiers do, out of some principal of yours.

    You want to go down that rabbit hole? Who gave Saddam the gas and the helicopters? Who installed Saddam as dictator?
    Governments all around the world are killing their people as we speak but that fact doesn't justify losing american lives in an invasion.
    Your countries soldiers? Get a grip. I actually care about troops enough to not throw them into conflict on the other side of the world for no reason. My position would mean no deaths, suicides, casualties, PTSD etc. Who really cares about the soldiers, you? A politician doesn't care what happens to his fellow citizens over seas. Nationalism shouldn't be toe your government line, it should about saving your fellow Americans lives.
     

    Jludo

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    Feb 14, 2013
    4,164
    48
    Indianapolis
    No. Saddam did that by bringing hell down on his people with his arrogant invasion of Kuwait.


    When they violate ceasefire terms we are enforcing, I would say that makes it our business. Would you not enforce the terms of the ceasefire?


    Based on what. You have presented an opinion, but have provided nothing to support it. We had every authority to invade. There is no debate. But I don't believe that there is an absolute on whether or not the decision to do so was good/bad/indifferent. The answer probably varies depending on which consideration is placed in the limelight.

    Based on protecting american lives and liberty you can't make a case for the invasion.
     
    Top Bottom