I was loading my new mags from the "Group Buy" Brad put together, and also set aside another 5 for my brother who is, "Air Force retired." I'm sending my brother 5 mags in the mail Friday. I say that with a sense pride as we took care of business and sent Mr. Prez. a message to let him know who is really in control.
-
Be sure to read this post! Beware of scammers. https://www.indianagunowners.com/threads/classifieds-new-online-payment-guidelines-rules-paypal-venmo-zelle-etc.511734/
Wow I just got scolded by the Prez
- Thread starter PMPORTER
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana
Member Benefits:
Fewer Ads! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
I am 25 years old. Some of the parents of the children of Sandy Hook were not much older than I am. Some have vowed to fight for gun control for the rest of thier lives. This means I must vow to to stand between them and the constitution for the rest of my life. I am prepared to fight so that my future children can live free and share the same love of firearms that I do. But they must also be ready to fight for thier rights. Now more than ever children are the future and it is up to us to instill the same fighting spirit into our kids so that this great country can remain free.
The Bubba Effect
Grandmaster
first they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.
If you subtract all those "bitter clingers", "fringe groups" and "terrorists" who still believe in the Constitution, you just might get to 90%. But that's the "new math" the current occupant of the WH uses.
I guess shame on Harry Reid too, he voted against it.
Procedural move so he can bring it back from the dead later on. Don't be fooled!!
The libs are going to resurrect this monstrosity for the 2014 mid-terms.
I think they're [STRIKE]hoping for[/STRIKE][STRIKE] counting on [/STRIKE]planning another atrocity sometime before the elections, and the closer to election day the better as far as they're concerned.
I think they're [STRIKE]hoping for[/STRIKE][STRIKE] counting on [/STRIKE]planning another atrocity sometime before the elections, and the closer to election day the better as far as they're concerned.
Sfrandolph
Shooter
We should not forget that this petulant child of a president still has his "executive order" pen sharpened up. I would not be the least surprised to see the criminal in chief try to use exec orders to implement his twisted gun control agenda.
This egomaniac does not like to lose at anything. He will keep trying to erode our constitutional rights. The second amendment is just a starting point. We have already surrendered quite a few of our rights so we can be " safe from terrorist" shame on us for conceding them.
So I read the survey where the 90% number came from. It's a bit misleading, in my opinion because it assumes that everyone being asked knows all the issues that come along with a UBC.
All it asked was if you would be in favor of requiring a background check from people buying at gunshows.
Then another question I saw asked if you would be in favor of requiring background checks for all sales.
A REAL survey would have also presented more facts surrounding the issue and re-asked the question to see if the 90% changes. Not only does that do a better job of surveying the issue, but it tells you how educated your sample is about the full scope of it.
All it asked was if you would be in favor of requiring a background check from people buying at gunshows.
Then another question I saw asked if you would be in favor of requiring background checks for all sales.
A REAL survey would have also presented more facts surrounding the issue and re-asked the question to see if the 90% changes. Not only does that do a better job of surveying the issue, but it tells you how educated your sample is about the full scope of it.
I cannot fathom the amount of name calling many of you participate in on a very regular basis. You make us all look a wee bit nutters. Whether you like him or not He is still Mr. President; not Barry, Not Oh-blah-blah, Not Bobo the Chimp, not Barack Hussein), and not that "illegal". Accept the fact you don't like him, but Romney/Ryan sucked more, and move on. Just *try* to grow up a *little* bit and maybe other adults will start listening.
Digressing into a 5-year old, ranting about 'Merika, using ad hominem attacks based on racism, xenophobia, personal insecurities, or just plain dislike, isn't appropriate. It isn't tolerated within the confines of this board between members, there is no reason to lower the standard for The President. Whether you personally like him or voted for him is irrelevant; he is still *your* elected leader.
Digressing into a 5-year old, ranting about 'Merika, using ad hominem attacks based on racism, xenophobia, personal insecurities, or just plain dislike, isn't appropriate. It isn't tolerated within the confines of this board between members, there is no reason to lower the standard for The President. Whether you personally like him or voted for him is irrelevant; he is still *your* elected leader.
Last edited:
Negative!!!!
He's the elected leader.
He in NO way represents my views, feelings, or concerns.
One may continue to respect the Office of The President, but the person holding that office must earn the respect of the American People.
The current officeholder has not, in any way, shape, or form, earned one iota of respect from me or, I suspect, millions of Americans.
I respect the office of the president, it is Obama who disgraces it. People may express that in different ways. But we are not obligated to pay homage to the king. And NO, he is not my president.
The Kenyan is full of crap.
This^^^^.
Key phrase here is "YOUR ELECTED LEADER."
I didnt vote for him in 2008.
I didnt vote for him in 2012.
If given the choice, I would vote him OUT today.
Back in 2008, he ran on the party of "change". Well, Ive seen how much his "change" has effected the way of life for millions of American citizens, and personally, I think we need to "change" the current resident of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.
I want my country back.
All semantics aside, Barack Hussein Obama is our President; belief has nothing to do with the matter.
That aside, we have many people on this board (of all political persuasions, genders, races, creeds, and religious beliefs) who passionately support our factual right to keep and bear arms. My larger point is why do we continue to draw lines in the sand, dividing even amongst ourselves as supporters of the 2A, using nothing but derision and disparagement as tools? The name calling does not serve our stated goal. I submit that agreeing to be respectful, raising the bar to gentlemanly (and gentle-ladylike) behavior, while presenting a factually-based united front is more helpful. If we raise that bar, our credibility is in turn strengthened.
That aside, we have many people on this board (of all political persuasions, genders, races, creeds, and religious beliefs) who passionately support our factual right to keep and bear arms. My larger point is why do we continue to draw lines in the sand, dividing even amongst ourselves as supporters of the 2A, using nothing but derision and disparagement as tools? The name calling does not serve our stated goal. I submit that agreeing to be respectful, raising the bar to gentlemanly (and gentle-ladylike) behavior, while presenting a factually-based united front is more helpful. If we raise that bar, our credibility is in turn strengthened.
Last edited:
