Titanium_Frost
Grandmaster
I'm old enough to remember a time when I worked at a local farm store, we would literally chase down thieves outside and beat the ever living crap out of them when we caught them. So much fun, ah the good old days. The manager would buy us a soda for a quarter when we got back with the guy to wait for the cops to haul them away for stealing a $2.99 fishing lure.Disagree. Businesses lead this charge by tolerating shoplifting, largely on the advise of corporate lawyers, because it was cheaper than just replacing the merchandise. Home Depot and Lowes would not call in shoplifters, and if you happened to catch one while off duty, they would not assist in prosecution. My partner caught a guy running out with power tools under each arm and the store would not cooperate in the slightest, so the charges were dropped. Menard's used to let loss prevention carry handcuffs and use force to detain, but that's done with.
In short, retailers made an environment that encouraged theft because it was cheaper. They didn't see down the line to the damage they were doing to society at large or to themselves later. Then when it became more of a problem to the bottom line, they expect us to step in and save them from themselves. Now there's not enough criminal justice resources to really deal with the magnitude of the problem.
It's a multi-faceted problem, but if you want the prime mover, look no further than laywers and the reduce liability above all culture they created because we allowed them to make money doing so.