The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • churchmouse

    I still care....Really
    Emeritus
    Rating - 100%
    187   0   0
    Dec 7, 2011
    191,809
    152
    Speedway area
    I believe your question(s) may bes addressed to some extent here:

    Thanks.
    I will watch this later.
     

    Blackhawk2001

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    Jun 20, 2010
    8,199
    113
    NW Indianapolis
    You can't. It's fantasy land. Our economies are so interwoven, are we going to set up import/export duties with Kentucky? Just the electricity grid/energy infrastructure alone is so interconnected as to be a major hurdle to any sort of "breakup". We'd be a weaker more ridiculous Europe. California would have the economic pull to bully other states in a way that they can't do under federalism. Landlocked states would especially be beholden to other states to allow import/export.

    The good news is because it's fantasy land nobody has to really think about how to implement it or deal with the unexpected and expected consequences. The bad news is that fantasy land BS takes away from real solutions, which just perhaps the OP is trying to do. Best of luck to him.
    I'm going to call "nonsense" here. Not because I don't think there'd be chaos if we split into separate "nation/states," but because the Constitution gave us a perfectly good mechanism to have a "United States" without having nation states. Congress and the Courts usurping the Interstate Commerce Clause to give them power over ALL the states outside actual "commerce" - buying, selling, and shipping between and among the states - is a relatively recent incursion into the individual states' powers and COULD be rolled back without undue hardship. The federal government was never intended to have as much power over individual states' policy and law as it has usurped in the past 100 years, and much of those powers it has usurped should be stripped from it. Doing so wouldn't particularly hurt anything but those states who've come to rely on DC to pay them more than they're paying DC.
     

    Site Supporter

    INGO Supporter

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    525,763
    Messages
    9,825,837
    Members
    53,917
    Latest member
    Hondolane
    Top Bottom