steveh_131
Grandmaster
Hmm........
Personal insults.
How unusual for you.
It's not an insult. It's a fact.
Hmm........
Personal insults.
How unusual for you.
2. The Bilderberg Group has had fifty seven years to enact their "nefarious" scheme.
3. One would think that at some point in over half a century it would dawn on the leadership of this "insidious" group that they are [STRIKE]not having much success [/STRIKE] reaching their alleged goal of a New World Order.
4. Or perhaps they have reached their goal and we all are being manipulated by them from decisions made at their "secret" meetings that the ENTIRE WORLD KNOWS ABOUT!!!!
Yeah!This.
Mike you nailed it. The process takes time. Free people don't vote themselves into servitude overnight.
Look at how far the country has fallen in 57 years. Look at how much freedom that our secret-society attending, globalist presidents have taken away from us. Look at how much socialism we have adopted and how much debt we have accrued. Look at the power that the Federal Government has amassed.
Mike, the country is careening off a cliff.
People like Robert Welch accurately detailed this process decades ago. It has happened.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Du2c3cQ5K4
I'm still waiting for one spec of proof.
Proof??I'm still waiting for one spec of proof.
See above.What's proof got to do with laying blame?
Proof??
Proof??
He don't need no stinkin proof!!
(Apologies to John Huston for messing up one of the great movie lines of all time.)
See above.
I'm still waiting for one spec of proof.
CFR Influence in Government, Media, & Business -- Modern History Project
From 1928-72, nine out of twelve Republican Presidential nominees were CFR members. From 1952-72, CFR members were elected four out of six times. During three separate campaigns, both the Republican and Democratic nominee were, or had been a member. Since World War II, practically every Presidential candidate, with the exception of Johnson, Goldwater, and Reagan, have been members.
If you think what you have produced is proof, you don't understand what the word means.
I'm not necessarily taking Rambone's side on this one, but what would be proof to you? I'm just curious.
Upthread, I used the analogy of the affair everyone KNEW I had. I wasn't just taking an opportunity to share my personal life, I was actually using it to illustrate the point.
To prove I was having an affair - meaning a sexual relationship - you have to have proof of sex, or at least something tangible like a hotel room rented for two hours every Weds afternoon. All the other stuff is just conjecture based on the way something "looks."
The problem Rambone is having trying to prove there is a conspiracy is that all the evidence he's presenting could also be used to support the official explanation of what these groups are doing.
Then there's a leap that since (and this is far from indisputable) we've tended toward a certain direction then that's an explanation that the World is moving along according to some master plan.
Show me where these people have agreed on a plan, show me how they've acted according to that plan.
I don't doubt these people influence each other and that influence may guide some of their future actions. The same could be said for INGO.
Show me that decisions are made, people are given marching orders, and they carry out those orders. Actual evidence, not innuendo.
If you think what you have produced is proof, you don't understand what the word means.
Upthread, I used the analogy of the affair everyone KNEW I had. I wasn't just taking an opportunity to share my personal life, I was actually using it to illustrate the point.
To prove I was having an affair - meaning a sexual relationship - you have to have proof of sex, or at least something tangible like a hotel room rented for two hours every Weds afternoon. All the other stuff is just conjecture based on the way something "looks."
Show me where these people have agreed on a plan, show me how they've acted according to that plan.
I don't doubt these people influence each other and that influence may guide some of their future actions. The same could be said for INGO.
Show me that decisions are made, people are given marching orders, and they carry out those orders. Actual evidence, not innuendo.