1) For my hands, the P10s is ergonomic perfection. Not good, not great-- PERFECT. It feels like a power tool, not a gun. I've never held a gun in this size range that was as good a fit for my hand. I don't have big hands, but the way the largest backstrap rounds out the back of the gun gives a commanding grip that inspires confidence. The texturing of the grip does the rest. They were smart enough to make the texture on the sides less aggressive so I suspect this will be easier on t-shirts when carried.
2) Soft shooting. Like noticeably less recoil than, say, a "full size" PPQ (I don't consider the PPQ to be full size, but whatever). I suspect the way the dual spring is setup has a lot to do with this, as the 2nd stage of spring is both very stiff but also only engaged at the last bit of slide travel. It works almost like a bump stop in high end off-road suspension. The potential downside here is that the gun might not be tolerant of mild loads and still cycle reliably.
3) Trigger is not what I'd call light. But it allows a clean break without disturbing the sights, something I have always struggled with in Glocks and many other pistols. Out of the box, I'm guessing upper 5# range. Takeup has a hint of grit, and then you get a slight bit of stacking in in the creep from wall to break. This is the kind of thing that after 500 rounds or so should all but disappear. I'm confident that after 500+ or so, this will be a low 5# trigger that has no grit. Reset is as short as you'd ever need.
4) It's tight/stiff when new. That said, it was 100% reliable for me and a friend even shooting my reloads. My teen daughter shooting centerfire pistol for the first time, however, induced two malfunctions that locked up the slide. Once cleared, those rounds fired fine for me. Investigation at home showed that my reloads are too long for this chamber (147 accuras at 1.08"). At home, I could induce various kinds of errors by riding slide, etc with my reloads. Could not do so with factory ammo or snap caps. The bullets are very wide and blunt, so they need to be seated shorter to feed properly.
So I'm chalking this up partly to limp wrist from a new shooter, partly to stiff new springs, and almost entirely up to hand loads that aren't in spec for this gun. The bullets were engraving before the case mouth bottomed. Oops.
Overall shooting experience is incredibly enjoyable. It didn't feel at all like "subcompact" gun at all. Heck, it's a better shooter than my P-07 was, than the G19s I've shot, than the PPQ (less recoil; PPQs have an annoying snap to them for some reason). Super flat shooting-- almost no flip.
I shoot it better than any 9mm I've tried to date. I haven't run any drills for time, but I'm the difference was enough to be outside a margin of error. With most pistols, I'm constantly adjusting my grip. Not anymore.
I didn't think I could go smaller than a G19 for carry purposes and *gain* shootability over a G19. Yet that appears to be exactly what I've lucked into here. It's both smaller AND more shootable. Fast followups are easy (so little flip, short reset, etc).
I'm NOT suggesting the P10s is a better gun categorically than the G19. That would be foolish. I am suggesting that it has some advantages for certain hand sizes and you might prefer the CZ as I do.
Obviously it needs a lot more rounds through it to demonstrate it is anywhere close to the legendary reliability of a Glock. That said, I've seen enough data points from other CZ P10 models to suggest reason for optimism on the reliability front. The guts sure as heck look beefy-- moreso than a Glock.
My Harry's Executive should be here soon enough, I'll see how it carries then. I also have a couple P10F mags (19rd) on the way from Greg Cote. I'm all-in on this, so hopefully I don't regret taking the plunge.