Rafael Sanchez using sensationalism? Say it ain't so! I've always found his brand of journalism to be unbiased and without any agenda.After searching a little I found what you're referring to. Looks like he is fishing for a little sensationalism trying to cash in on the "guns are news" craze. Rather than investigative research on a real story he can ride this wave till it peters out.
It's a real concern for those who holster/unholster often like I do at work. It should not be an issue if you leave your handgun in it's holster when you dress/undress and during your day. Those jacket pulls can make their way into your trigger guard upon reholstering if they hang down too much. It's nothing new.
1) I am actually shocked by the chief’s actions. He should have asked for a gun from behind the counter to compare; there was no need to un-holster his personal, loaded, EDC weapon. Even at stores with an indoor range – you are not to handle your weapon as the Chief did; you would likely be asked to leave and not return. 2) The mechanical “safety” - on ANY gun – is never 100% reliable. The MOST important safety on EVERY gun – is the thinking part between your ears. 3) Weapon Familiarity: I carry a Glock pistol myself. My “primary” holster and means of carry would leave the possibility of other clothing – not just a jacket draw string, interfering with the trigger. Therefore, I am very careful if and when I re-holster, and/or change holsters that the trigger guard is clear. This ties directly back to Note 2. 4) I have carried other types of pistols, with other types (thumb, typically) safeties. These can be bumped to fire position, and leave you with the same, situation and a false sense of security. I have also hunted with a shot-gun, when I was 12 to when I was 16, which had a failed mechanical safety that was discovered after I graduated to another gun. There were no ‘accidents’; but again – this goes to the prior notes and in particular note 2. 5) This warning you are mentioning / seeking, while you are point out an issue with Glock; would equally apply to a vast number of other pistols makes and models that have copied the ‘concept’ of the Glock Trigger. Many these other, similar pistols are also carried by other police departments and civilians.
As others have said; if you are carrying for Self Protection – carry with the gun loaded. Doing otherwise will likely cost you your life, if you need to use it. And be sure you are familiar with your weapon’s operation, and get training on using it.
As to cutting of the draw-string, I see that as at best a semi-helpful solution. Other clothing has been known to get caught, and if you carry concealed, beneath a shirt, or jacket – this can cause the same issue. The proper solution, in my opinion, is familiarity, and don’t mess with a loaded gun so casually.
I don't watch the 'Yellow Journalism' on the local stations. Can't trust anybody anymore.
I have also hunted with a shot-gun, when I was 12 to when I was 16, which had a failed mechanical safety that was discovered after I graduated to another gun.
I had a pistol with a mechanical safety that I bought back in my "guns without mechanical safeties are a bad idea" days. I had just finished cleaning and reassembling it and was giving it a functional check when I discovered that the trigger pulled even with the safety engaged. I don't know how long it had been that way but I had apparently been carrying a firearm that I thought was "safer" than it really was. I took it to my LGS and had them send it in for repair so it works properly now. Mechanical safeties do break.