Would you oppose a law that prevented a homeowner from discharging a firearm outside (we'll say it's an outdoor range), say from 8pm-5am, in a residential neighborhood? If you would, you're not an absolutist.
I think the OP left 0.1% wiggle room for just such examples...
I think the OP left 0.1% wiggle room for just such examples...
The noise ordinance violation is example irrelevant anyway. The 2nd Amendment is about the right to keep and bear arms to protect against tyranny, not the the right to shoot them anytime, anywhere.
Perhaps I misunderstood the "what part of 'shall not be infringed' don't you not understand" notion, that I see so often.
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
I'm not sure who has put forward the idea that the 2nd Amendment allows for unfettered gunshots anytime and anywhere.
Are you arguing with yourself again?
So you wouldn't consider a ban on discharging a firearm, anytime, anywhere, a violation of the 2nd Amendment? Interesting. Problem solved. I'll forward that belief to my anti-gun friends and see if they can make hay out of it.
I'm ok with a few noise ordinances, what I'm talking about is ownership of anything and everything that falls under the term small arms.
So you wouldn't consider a ban on discharging a firearm, anytime, anywhere, a violation of the 2nd Amendment? Interesting. Problem solved. I'll forward that belief to my anti-gun friends and see if they can make hay out of it.
Does anyone else think that 99.9% of all gun laws should be scrapped?
Not just gun laws.
So do you think that laws against committing murder with a gun is an infringement on Second Amendment rights?
I'm ok with a few noise ordinances, what I'm talking about is ownership of anything and everything that falls under the term small arms.
Yes. Period.