Lately I have noticed the above in quite a few articles and such, along with I am not afraid. Is this the latest pitch from anti 2nd people. It seems like they are trying the angle that if you take responsibility for your safety, you must be some sort of person that is unbalanced.
I get that statically the likelihood of ever needing a gun are low, however what if you have ever lost a family member to a violent thug seems to me that the perceived likelihood of ever needing a defensive tool would be skewed.
To me people carry for lots of good reasons, why is it that those who do not can't keep their mouth shut and exercise their right not to Carry while refraining for exposing how superior their choice is.
I get that statically the likelihood of ever needing a gun are low, however what if you have ever lost a family member to a violent thug seems to me that the perceived likelihood of ever needing a defensive tool would be skewed.
To me people carry for lots of good reasons, why is it that those who do not can't keep their mouth shut and exercise their right not to Carry while refraining for exposing how superior their choice is.