I'm in the 24.0gr of H110 with a 240gr XTP/HP club. One 8pt buck to it's credit.
H110 is a good choice. Doesn't burn as clean as 296, but isn't as temp sensative.
Like a couple have already said, I actually prefer the more versatile 2400.
I read somewhere that H110 and 296 are the exact same powder, in a different package.(the data is the same) I don't know if this was always true and Winchester/Hodgedon are just now acknowledging it, or if they used to be different. Same with 231 and HP-38.
2400 is great stuff...a little harder to meter, but not bad.
http://data.hodgdon.com/main_menu.asp
I shot my S&W 629 Classic today with the 21.1 gr of H-110 and I'm not going to complain. It's gonna be just fine. The book says 1200 fps, I didn't cronagraph it but it's gonna get the job done on killing a deer. I'm sure of that. Thanks for the input and on the next 50 I might bump it up to 24 grains.
I have heard the same, but don't know for sure. I also have read where St. Marks powders produce both the 296 for Win and H110 for Hodgdon.
read post # 5... I tried finding a number and was gonna call and verify myself...
Click here: H-110 and W-296 Are Not The Same
While I can easily believe that they are the same powders today, I find it hard to believe they always were. I see in the link there are more than (1) that claim that they have always been the same.
What I remember about both was that the 296 was definately cleaner burning as compared to the H110.