Got my first response from my new Rep Rudy Yakima

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Hardscrable

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Jan 6, 2010
    6,098
    113
    S.E. of Southwest
    I received a response my contacting his office re: ATF/Brace. Proud sponsor of HJ Res 44, strong supporter of 2A, yadda, yadda. Good so far. Then 1 sentence jumped out at me - re: 2A “that right should not be UNNECESSARILY infringed upon by the ATF or any other bureaucratic” agency.”

    Uh, my constitution says ”shall not be infringed upon.” I am pondering my response
     

    Cameramonkey

    www.thechosen.tv
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    35   0   0
    May 12, 2013
    32,001
    77
    Camby area
    I received a response my contacting his office re: ATF/Brace. Proud sponsor of HJ Res 44, strong supporter of 2A, yadda, yadda. Good so far. Then 1 sentence jumped out at me - re: 2A “that right should not be UNNECESSARILY infringed upon by the ATF or any other bureaucratic” agency.”

    Uh, my constitution says ”shall not be infringed upon.” I am pondering my response
    DO IT. He obviously doesnt believe in the constitution. Unless he is unnecessarily mentioning that felons shouldnt have guns, etc.
     

    Hardscrable

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Jan 6, 2010
    6,098
    113
    S.E. of Southwest
    #1 I will reply just will think thru
    #2 Won’t make any difference.
    #3 Only other comment is he has to be better than the Goshen D that opposed him. With Jackie’s hubby endorsing him he has the R spot locked up. Gonna take a D to beat him at this point.
     

    WebSnyper

    Time to make the chimichangas
    Rating - 100%
    59   0   0
    Jul 3, 2010
    15,700
    113
    127.0.0.1
    I received a response my contacting his office re: ATF/Brace. Proud sponsor of HJ Res 44, strong supporter of 2A, yadda, yadda. Good so far. Then 1 sentence jumped out at me - re: 2A “that right should not be UNNECESSARILY infringed upon by the ATF or any other bureaucratic” agency.”

    Uh, my constitution says ”shall not be infringed upon.” I am pondering my response
    Maybe ask what he would consider to be a necessary infringement.
     

    bgcatty

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    24   0   0
    Sep 9, 2011
    3,184
    113
    Carmel
    Maybe tell the idiot politician to read the 2A with a Dictionary handy so he can look up the words of the 2A and learn what “shall not be infringed” means in plain English just like the framers of the Constitution intended. Sheesh!
     
    Top Bottom