I strongly suspect she'll just turn out to be a plant for the teachers' union. She's already fallen in line on the "Common Core" standards, after making noises to the effect that she thought they should be "reviewed" (analogous to Obama saying NAFTA needed to be "reviewed" in the 2008 campaign to woo Union supporters...while his peeps were secretly and feverishly assuring the Canadians that he didn't really mean anything by it).
So I suspect any conservative-leaning people who voted for Ritz on the grounds she'd be refreshing and different, are about to get taken to the cleaners.
The issue isn't that Common Core is Ritz's "baby." It's that she campaigned under the pretense of being new and different, which so far it appears she isn't, at least as far as Common Core is concerned.
As an employee of the Education industry, you may not have liked what "Bennett and the Republicans" did, but at least they didn't make any bones about what they were up to. They said what they would do, and gave people the chance to vote them out if they didn't agree.
What they didn't do, is schlurk around like Glenda Ritz, pretending to be a critic of Common Core to get some much-needed Republican support in her effort to secure her first term at the Public Trough, only to change her spots after 8 weeks in office and sign on to the status quo.
I know it's pretty inexcusable for any supposedly right-of-center person to have seen her as anything other than a Union plant, or to think she even had the authority to change Common Core, but the fact is there were some folks who were misled by her statements, and it now appears to have been crass and calculated on her part.
But apparently, crass and misleading behavior in support of the public education gravy train is considered no vice.