Everytown & Mom's Demand Action Insider Documents: Words We Use

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • rebase

    Marksman
    Rating - 100%
    9   0   0
    Feb 25, 2019
    160
    28
    Indianapolis
    So.... I came across this and figured this might be interesting for some of yall working on the front lines - its an internal document of Everytown & Moms Demand Action describing what specific wording and language they use.

    Its actually quire interesting how the other side thinks, and how the think tanks hired to put this document together try to explain away in "mom terms" rather than just outright saying certain words tested better than others in their focus group.

    TL;DR

    - Avoid the term: “guncontrol.” -> “gun safety.”
    - Don't say: “Gun owners” or “NRA members” -> Say “gun lobby” or “NRA’s extremist leadership.”
    - Don't say "nearly 6 million members" -> Say “nearly 6 million supporters”
    - Don't bring up the 2nd Amendment - > Say "we all want to keep our families safe”
    - Don’t refer to those killed by gun violence as being “lost to gun violence.”
    - Describe people personally experienced gun violence as "survivors"
    - Don't talk about a tragedy's "anniversary" -> call it a "one/two/three year mark"
    - Don't use the term "committed suicide" -> talk about people who "died by gun suicide"
    - When talking about suicide emphasize that it is a "preventable crisis"
    - Don't say "successful suicide" -> talk about "gun suicide attempts that resulted in death"
    - Avoid the term "urban gun violence" -> say "city gun violence"
    - Avoid the term "gang violence"-> say "group violence"
    - Avoid calling communities "vulnerable", "at risk", or "needy" -> Use language that centers people's power like "Black communities in New Orleans have been historically under-valued, under-resources, under-invested in and that has led to more gun violence"
    - It’s better to talk about “gun violence in Black communities,” than to say “gun violence in communities of color” when what you mean is Black communities.
    - Dont say: “officer-involved shootings.” -> Use "shootings by police"
    - When speaking about the boyfriend loophole, refer to “all people, regardless of marital status,” -> rather than "unmarried women"
    - Dont say "mentally ill people" -> Say “people who are prohibited from having guns due to mental illness.”
    - Dont say "ban", "restrict,”“control”or“confiscate” -> When talking about firearm hardware that should be illegal, we talk about “prohibiting bump stocks” or “ending the sale of assault weapons.”
    - When describing people prohibited from buying a gun, becareful with words like “felons” or “criminals.” -> use person-first language and lean towards talking broadly, such as talking about “people who shouldn’t have guns.”
    - (With respect to red flag laws) Avoid playing into the NRA’s messaging by skipping phrases that misrepresent our goals such as, “taking guns away” or “confiscating guns”— it’s more accurate to talk about “temporary removal” or “temporarily preventing access” when there’s a clear risk.
    - Describe extreme risk laws as a “suicide intervention” tool, rather than “suicide prevention”
    - We avoid the term “universal background checks,” -> We use the term “ background checks on all gun sales.”
    - *Background checks are the foundation of any effective gun violence prevention strategy.* (WTF)
    - We prefer “unlicensed sellers” over the term “private sellers.”
    - We avoid “private sellers” because framing it as a privacy issue avoids the more important point - closing this loophole is a vital public safety issue.
    - The gun lobby calls it “constitutional carry” — we call it “permitless carry.”
    - Don't call them "gun-free zones" - talk instead about how "We all want to keep our families safe"
    - Avoid calling it “campus carry.” -> Call it "Guns on campus"
    - We track “gunfire on school grounds” rather than “school shootings.”
    - Don’t refer to shootings by children as “accidental shootings;” -> we talk about unintentional shootings by children
    - We avoid “safe storage” -> talk about “secure storage” instead
     

    Attachments

    • ObnHCU-Words We Use_2020.pdf
      294.1 KB · Views: 8

    Eagle

    Plinker
    Rating - 100%
    9   0   0
    Nov 29, 2020
    125
    28
    Greenwood
    Their sensitivity to the term "gun free zone" indicates they actually realize what an insipid concept it is.





    They can still go straight to h*ll.

    It’s not sensitivity, it’s carefully selected wording designed to gain support from those without strong opinions. This is propaganda, and the left does it very well. They are winning the language fight, and therefore winning over people.

    We should understand their tactics.

    Great post, OP.
     

    Mgderf

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    43   0   0
    May 30, 2009
    18,066
    113
    Lafayette
    It’s not sensitivity, it’s carefully selected wording designed to gain support from those without strong opinions. This is propaganda, and the left does it very well. They are winning the language fight, and therefore winning over people.

    We should understand their tactics.

    Great post, OP.
    I see it more as a desperation move.
    The votes aren't there for them to advance their tyranny, and their messaging is a big part of the reason.
    Keep digging Dems.
    I'll loan you another shovel if you'd like.
     

    KittySlayer

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Jan 29, 2013
    6,474
    77
    Northeast IN
    It’s not sensitivity, it’s carefully selected wording designed to gain support from those without strong opinions. This is propaganda, and the left does it very well. They are winning the language fight, and therefore winning over people.

    We should understand their tactics.

    Great post, OP.
    I noticed one of our local Pro Life advocates switched her wording from referring to the abortion of "unborn babies" to "boys and girls". It was a very distinct shift in her language choice and as I heard her interview and it impacted my mental image of the life being ended by abortion. Likely has an impact on people without a strong opinion be it abortion or guns.

    When I hear "unborn babies" my mental image was the Chicago Museum of Science and Industry display I remember seeing as a preteen kid. Fascinating display but still a science experiment in formaldehyde.

    museum_baby.jpg

    When I hear "boys and girls" I mentally see playing kids along with the sounds of laughter.

    Playground.jpg
     

    xwing

    Expert
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Apr 11, 2012
    1,171
    113
    Greene County
    It’s not sensitivity, it’s carefully selected wording designed to gain support from those without strong opinions. This is propaganda, and the left does it very well. They are winning the language fight, and therefore winning over people.

    We should understand their tactics.

    Great post, OP.

    Absolutely. It's good to understand what they are trying to achieve and how specifically they are trying to achieve it. "Know your enemy" is a good tactic so we can better counter them. They have loads of lawyers and media consultants who constantly tweak their terms and phrases to sway the undecided / uninformed. We all know the "main-stream" media will simply read the anti-gun groups' press releases and report them as "fact".
     

    Mgderf

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    43   0   0
    May 30, 2009
    18,066
    113
    Lafayette
    It is a smart tactic to carefully choose your words, especially when engaging in propaganda. Why do you see desperation? Have we gotten any rights they have taken back?
    I was referring to this particular campaign.
    No, we have NOT regained much of any rights denied/restricted/INFRINGED..,.
     

    rebase

    Marksman
    Rating - 100%
    9   0   0
    Feb 25, 2019
    160
    28
    Indianapolis
    It’s not sensitivity, it’s carefully selected wording designed to gain support from those without strong opinions. This is propaganda, and the left does it very well. They are winning the language fight, and therefore winning over people.

    We should understand their tactics.

    Great post, OP.
    Thanks @Eagle

    Absolutely. It's good to understand what they are trying to achieve and how specifically they are trying to achieve it. "Know your enemy" is a good tactic so we can better counter them. They have loads of lawyers and media consultants who constantly tweak their terms and phrases to sway the undecided / uninformed. We all know the "main-stream" media will simply read the anti-gun groups' press releases and report them as "fact".

    Know thy enemy politically diametrical position indeed!
     

    kiddchaos

    Shooter
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Oct 11, 2011
    1,371
    63
    Indianapolis
    So.... I came across this and figured this might be interesting for some of yall working on the front lines - its an internal document of Everytown & Moms Demand Action describing what specific wording and language they use.

    Its actually quire interesting how the other side thinks, and how the think tanks hired to put this document together try to explain away in "mom terms" rather than just outright saying certain words tested better than others in their focus group.

    TL;DR

    - Avoid the term: “guncontrol.” -> “gun safety.”
    - Don't say: “Gun owners” or “NRA members” -> Say “gun lobby” or “NRA’s extremist leadership.”
    - Don't say "nearly 6 million members" -> Say “nearly 6 million supporters”
    - Don't bring up the 2nd Amendment - > Say "we all want to keep our families safe”
    - Don’t refer to those killed by gun violence as being “lost to gun violence.”
    - Describe people personally experienced gun violence as "survivors"
    - Don't talk about a tragedy's "anniversary" -> call it a "one/two/three year mark"
    - Don't use the term "committed suicide" -> talk about people who "died by gun suicide"
    - When talking about suicide emphasize that it is a "preventable crisis"
    - Don't say "successful suicide" -> talk about "gun suicide attempts that resulted in death"
    - Avoid the term "urban gun violence" -> say "city gun violence"
    - Avoid the term "gang violence"-> say "group violence"
    - Avoid calling communities "vulnerable", "at risk", or "needy" -> Use language that centers people's power like "Black communities in New Orleans have been historically under-valued, under-resources, under-invested in and that has led to more gun violence"
    - It’s better to talk about “gun violence in Black communities,” than to say “gun violence in communities of color” when what you mean is Black communities.
    - Dont say: “officer-involved shootings.” -> Use "shootings by police"
    - When speaking about the boyfriend loophole, refer to “all people, regardless of marital status,” -> rather than "unmarried women"
    - Dont say "mentally ill people" -> Say “people who are prohibited from having guns due to mental illness.”
    - Dont say "ban", "restrict,”“control”or“confiscate” -> When talking about firearm hardware that should be illegal, we talk about “prohibiting bump stocks” or “ending the sale of assault weapons.”
    - When describing people prohibited from buying a gun, becareful with words like “felons” or “criminals.” -> use person-first language and lean towards talking broadly, such as talking about “people who shouldn’t have guns.”
    - (With respect to red flag laws) Avoid playing into the NRA’s messaging by skipping phrases that misrepresent our goals such as, “taking guns away” or “confiscating guns”— it’s more accurate to talk about “temporary removal” or “temporarily preventing access” when there’s a clear risk.
    - Describe extreme risk laws as a “suicide intervention” tool, rather than “suicide prevention”
    - We avoid the term “universal background checks,” -> We use the term “ background checks on all gun sales.”
    - *Background checks are the foundation of any effective gun violence prevention strategy.* (WTF)
    - We prefer “unlicensed sellers” over the term “private sellers.”
    - We avoid “private sellers” because framing it as a privacy issue avoids the more important point - closing this loophole is a vital public safety issue.
    - The gun lobby calls it “constitutional carry” — we call it “permitless carry.”
    - Don't call them "gun-free zones" - talk instead about how "We all want to keep our families safe"
    - Avoid calling it “campus carry.” -> Call it "Guns on campus"
    - We track “gunfire on school grounds” rather than “school shootings.”
    - Don’t refer to shootings by children as “accidental shootings;” -> we talk about unintentional shootings by children
    - We avoid “safe storage” -> talk about “secure storage” instead
    Sent to Stossel Tv - hope he does a piece of this. Thanks.
     

    SheepDog4Life

    Natural Gray Man
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    May 14, 2016
    5,319
    113
    SW IN
    - When speaking about the boyfriend loophole, refer to “all people, regardless of marital status,” -> rather than "unmarried women"

    I thought the Domestic Partner laws already covered unmarried domestic partners.

    What is this loophole they speak of? I'm trying to figure out what kind of relationship status two people could have that is a "domestic partnership" but is not currently covered in the existing scope?
     
    Top Bottom