Thus my argument all along. The DA is applying the law correctly, in his best judgment.
When has the administration and application of the law ever been as simple as words on a page? This one is destined to be duked out in in the state legislature.
In as far as the police are concerned in this matter: Its irrelevant to the argument as far as how McDonald is being applied to WI law by the DA. The police perform their duties as they deem applicable, and the DA his. Personally, I see the LE in said county spinning their proverbial wheels.
But it's obvious that he's not applying the law correctly, because there's nothing at all in McDonald about carrying firearms.
There's nothing to duke out. It's not in the holdings.
Like I said, it's crazy to me how some will cry activism when it comes to other violations of separation of powers, while chanting about how great this is.
It shows that "activism" just depends on the content of the person's action, and whether the person agrees with them politically.
Last I checked, a "police state" was a country in which the executive branch made the laws. In this case, that's precisely what is happening here.