Anti-2A movement playing dirty & trying to start dissent with S&W shareholders

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • brchixwing

    Sharpshooter
    Rating - 100%
    75   0   0
    Nov 13, 2016
    326
    12
    Indianapolis
    This was on yesterday's earnings call from Smith and Wesson (AOBC), anti 2A activists bought shares to start drama & try to mess with management & the investor base.
    A special interest group bought 200 shares of AOBC (probably spent $2K and ironically profiting $400 as of this morning) and they are requesting a vote by shareholders to require management to issue a "Gun Safety Report".

    "organizations like those represented by the proponent began purchasing shares of firearm manufacturers and retailers solely to become activists, not because they thought these companies were a good investment, this admission comes directly from Colleen Scanlon, the Chief Advocacy Officer of Catholic Health Initiatives, one of the co-sponsors of the proposal in our proxy. As sizable and bona fide stockholders ourselves, we do not believe that our investment or yours should be negatively impacted by a politically-motivated stockholder that represents literally 0.0004% of our stock"

    Event Details | Investors | American Outdoor Brands

    As a stockholder, you recently received our annual proxy and voting materials. Your vote is always very important and especially important this year. In addition to our routine items, this year, we're required to include a stockholder proposal, requesting that we issue a so-called Gun Safety Report addressing several topics, which I won't detail here, but which I encourage you to read in our proxy. Our management team and our Board of Directors believe you should vote against this stockholder proposal for several reasons which we also detailed in the proxy. Chief among them is the fact that even if such a report was feasible, which it is not, that would do absolutely nothing to make our communities safer.

    We find it curious that the proponents of this proposal overlooks our longstanding call for and involvement in actions that truly have meaningful impact, such as greater vigilance in enforcing the laws and criminal penalties on the books and the need to meaningfully address the role that mental illness plays in senseless violence. We outlined many of these initiatives such as Fix NICS, Project Childsafe and Suicide Prevention in the annual report you received recently.

    In contrast, the proponents' efforts appear to be more about that anti-gun agenda versus addressing the problem they claim to be concerned about. The proponent is part of a special interest group with an anti-firearms agenda and they are misusing the proxy process to advance their own political agenda and anti-firearms narrative at the expense of our company, our employees and our stockholders. Unlike a bona fide investor, this proponent purchased just 200 shares, the bare-minimum needed under SEC rules to place an item on the proxy with the sole objective to push an anti-firearms agenda designed to harm our company, disrupt the local sale of our products and destroy stockholder value. This proponent will gladly sacrifice its investment and yours to achieve its political objectives.

    As reported in the Institutional Investor magazine earlier this month, organizations like those represented by the proponent began purchasing shares of firearm manufacturers and retailers solely to become activists, not because they thought these companies were a good investment, this admission comes directly from Colleen Scanlon, the Chief Advocacy Officer of Catholic Health Initiatives, one of the co-sponsors of the proposal in our proxy. As sizable and bona fide stockholders ourselves, we do not believe that our investment or yours should be negatively impacted by a politically-motivated stockholder that represents literally 0.0004% of our stock. Let me repeat that. The proponent holds 0.0004% of our stock, and has zero interest in generating a return on their investment. We do believe in the Second Amendment rights of Americans. We also believe in our legislative process and we believe that issues relating to those rights should be debated and decided in our legislatures, not at anyone's annual meeting of stockholders. For these reasons, we strongly recommend a vote against the proponents' proposal.
     

    T.Lex

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    15   0   0
    Mar 30, 2011
    25,859
    113
    Playing dirty?

    Naw, this is the old fashioned big league game. Good to see the company recognized it and is fighting back.
     

    brchixwing

    Sharpshooter
    Rating - 100%
    75   0   0
    Nov 13, 2016
    326
    12
    Indianapolis
    Yeah, they jumped in front of it quick, its been ugly for AOBC shareholders (some recovery this morning, back to $12).
    Tragedies used to help the stock but DT calmed the panic buying & the anti-2a movement has hit the investor base after Parkland.
    Earlier this year politicians got state pension funds to force their asset managers to dump AOBC & RGR. (FL owned some shares)
    https://www.cnbc.com/2018/02/22/state-pensions-and-fund-companies-feel-heat-over-their-gun-stock-investments.html

    Playing dirty?

    Naw, this is the old fashioned big league game. Good to see the company recognized it and is fighting back.
     

    NyleRN

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    29   0   0
    Dec 14, 2013
    3,867
    113
    Scottsburg
    Anti 2A shareholders today: "Let's buy stock so we can have a voice in management and try to wreck this company"
    Anti 2A shareholders 2yrs from now: "Hmmm, let's think about taking a different approach to this cause I'm really liking my investment returns"
     

    brchixwing

    Sharpshooter
    Rating - 100%
    75   0   0
    Nov 13, 2016
    326
    12
    Indianapolis
    LOL like how liberals start making money aka paying taxes and then end up voting right

    Anti 2A shareholders today: "Let's buy stock so we can have a voice in management and try to wreck this company"
    Anti 2A shareholders 2yrs from now: "Hmmm, let's think about taking a different approach to this cause I'm really liking my investment returns"
     

    brchixwing

    Sharpshooter
    Rating - 100%
    75   0   0
    Nov 13, 2016
    326
    12
    Indianapolis
    Ruger’s shareholders ended up caving to the pressure: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/09/business/sturm-ruger-shareholders-activists.html


    Now, Ruger must produce a report by February that addresses how it tracks violence associated with its firearms, what kind of research it is conducting related to so-called smart gun technology (such as using thumbprint readers, like those used on smartphones) and its assessment of the risks that gun-related crimes pose to the company’s reputation and finances.

    Christopher J. Killoy, Ruger’s chief executive, was defiant after the vote, saying that Ruger would not “adopt misguided principles by groups that do not own guns and do not understand guns.”





    Didn't this same thing happen to Ruger a few months back?
     

    87iroc

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Dec 25, 2012
    3,437
    48
    Bartholomew County
    Activist Investing isn't new. Surprised they tried it with so little percentage though. typically its a much larger percentage. I think I had read about it at work or something...new 'trend' in investing groups.
     

    actaeon277

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Nov 20, 2011
    93,335
    113
    Merrillville
    Ruger’s shareholders ended up caving to the pressure: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/09/business/sturm-ruger-shareholders-activists.html


    Now, Ruger must produce a report by February that addresses how it tracks violence associated with its firearms, what kind of research it is conducting related to so-called smart gun technology (such as using thumbprint readers, like those used on smartphones) and its assessment of the risks that gun-related crimes pose to the company’s reputation and finances.

    Christopher J. Killoy, Ruger’s chief executive, was defiant after the vote, saying that Ruger would not “adopt misguided principles by groups that do not own guns and do not understand guns.”



    Dumb shareholders had someone speak, and they wanted to appear to be "caring".
    I'd have at them. To their face.
    I'm told I'm pretty good at it.


    when-someone-tries-to-hurt-your-feelings-but-youve-been-10661316.png



    when-someone-tries-to-hurt-your-feelings-but-you-dont-6048288.png



    when-someone-tries-to-hurt-your-feelings-but-you-dont-have-27189273.png
     

    OakRiver

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Aug 12, 2014
    15,013
    77
    IN
    Ruger’s shareholders ended up caving to the pressure: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/09/business/sturm-ruger-shareholders-activists.html


    Now, Ruger must produce a report by February that addresses how it tracks violence associated with its firearms, what kind of research it is conducting related to so-called smart gun technology (such as using thumbprint readers, like those used on smartphones) and its assessment of the risks that gun-related crimes pose to the company’s reputation and finances.

    Christopher J. Killoy, Ruger’s chief executive, was defiant after the vote, saying that Ruger would not “adopt misguided principles by groups that do not own guns and do not understand guns.”


    It was a cave, but a very non-committal cave;
    - how do you track violence associated with your firearms? We don't. Next question.
    - what research are you doing into smart guns? None. Next question.
    - Reputation risk? We sell our products legally. We are not responsible for people who break the law, or use our products in an unsafe or malicious fashion. And done.
     
    Top Bottom