I have never been so mad

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Status
    Not open for further replies.
    Rating - 100%
    8   0   0
    Jan 18, 2009
    2,227
    113
    SE Indy
    Was out on a service call and saw this.
    Take a look at this truck. Just wondering what other true Americans think. I'm all for the 1st amendment and free speech but..... 20221202_115954.jpg
     

    indyblue

    Guns & Pool Shooter
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Aug 13, 2013
    3,672
    129
    Indy Northside `O=o-
    Surprised those graphics haven't been vandalized yet. Or maybe they have and have been replaced.

    Basher's right though, could be. Most don't/can't tell the difference between muslim extremists and the rest.

    The guy with the AK though, not sure what that is trying to convey.
     

    nucular

    Expert
    Rating - 100%
    10   0   0
    Dec 17, 2012
    1,181
    113
    Brownsburg
    Oh so is the issue just that it is middle east themed? I thought maybe it was some evil terrorist that I just didn't recognize.
     
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Mar 9, 2022
    2,284
    113
    Bloomington
    …but you’re really not, if seeing this makes you want to silence them…

    Chances are VERY good that he’s Sikh, not Muslim, aka one of the good guys. And in the small chance he isn’t? Tough, this is what freedom of speech looks like. :dunno:
    He never said he wanted to silence them.

    I think it was G. K. Chesterton who said something like "to have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it."

    I can absolutely be disgusted, appalled, and horrified by something, and think it is 100% wrong to do, but at the same time acknowledge that it is not the government's place to stop somebody from doing that thing, and that they have a right to do it under our laws.

    (Disclaimer: I'm not actually saying that I'm disgusted, appalled, and horrified by the picture in OP's post; I'm really not sure what that decal supposed to convey.)
     

    Bigtanker

    Cuddles
    Emeritus
    Rating - 100%
    24   0   0
    Aug 21, 2012
    21,688
    151
    Osceola
    I see them all of the time on I94 headed back to Canada. Probably 8 out of 10 trucks that are based in Canada have Middle Eastern drivers.
     

    cg21

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    25   0   0
    May 5, 2012
    4,683
    113
    He never said he wanted to silence them.

    I think it was G. K. Chesterton who said something like "to have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it."

    I can absolutely be disgusted, appalled, and horrified by something, and think it is 100% wrong to do, but at the same time acknowledge that it is not the government's place to stop somebody from doing that thing, and that they have a right to do it under our laws.

    (Disclaimer: I'm not actually saying that I'm disgusted, appalled, and horrified by the picture in OP's post; I'm really not sure what that decal supposed to convey.)
    Agreed. I don’t like joe bidet but I hate the f bidet flags…… just cause I have little kids. So I even agree with the message just dont Like it on display.
     

    Basher

    Expert
    Rating - 100%
    17   0   0
    May 3, 2022
    1,197
    113
    Lafayette
    He never said he wanted to silence them.

    I think it was G. K. Chesterton who said something like "to have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it."

    I can absolutely be disgusted, appalled, and horrified by something, and think it is 100% wrong to do, but at the same time acknowledge that it is not the government's place to stop somebody from doing that thing, and that they have a right to do it under our laws.

    (Disclaimer: I'm not actually saying that I'm disgusted, appalled, and horrified by the picture in OP's post; I'm really not sure what that decal supposed to convey.)

    He VERY strongly implied it, and to say otherwise is being disingenuous. If it was only that he didn’t like the signs, he would have said such. But to say “I’m all for XYZ, but…” is commonly understood to mean that you actually aren’t “all for it,” but rather question XYZ, or only support it with certain modifiers applied (generally in your favor).
     
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Mar 9, 2022
    2,284
    113
    Bloomington
    He VERY strongly implied it, and to say otherwise is being disingenuous. If it was only that he didn’t like the signs, he would have said such. But to say “I’m all for XYZ, but…” is commonly understood to mean that you actually aren’t “all for it,” but rather question XYZ, or only support it with certain modifiers applied (generally in your favor).
    I have to disagree with you. Not that I think your interpretation isn't possible, and it certainly could be the correct one, but I think it's a bit of an exaggeration to describe any other interpretation as "disingenuous."
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.
    Top Bottom